From: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH v2 storage] lvm plugin: fix locking for rollback when using CLI
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2025 11:17:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251120101742.24843-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> (raw)
Doing a rollback via CLI on an LVM storage with 'saferemove' and
'snapshot-as-volume-chain' would run into a locking issue, because
the forked zero-out worker would try to acquire the lock while the
main CLI task is still inside the locked section for
volume_snapshot_rollback_locked(). The same issue does not happen when
the rollback is done via UI. The reason for this can be found in the
note regarding fork_worker():
> we simulate running in foreground if ($self->{type} eq 'cli')
So the worker will be awaited synchronously in CLI context, resulting
in the deadlock, while via API/UI, the main task would move on and
release the lock allowing the zero-out worker to acquire it.
Avoid doing fork_cleanup_worker() inside the locked section to avoid
the issue.
Fixes: 8eabcc7 ("lvm plugin: snapshot-as-volume-chain: use locking for snapshot operations")
Signed-off-by: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
---
Changes in v2:
* Better explanation in commit message.
* Also spawn cleanup worker in error scenario like before the patch.
src/PVE/Storage/LVMPlugin.pm | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/PVE/Storage/LVMPlugin.pm b/src/PVE/Storage/LVMPlugin.pm
index 97f7bf4..102cf22 100644
--- a/src/PVE/Storage/LVMPlugin.pm
+++ b/src/PVE/Storage/LVMPlugin.pm
@@ -1117,23 +1117,17 @@ sub volume_rollback_is_possible {
}
my sub volume_snapshot_rollback_locked {
- my ($class, $scfg, $storeid, $volname, $snap) = @_;
+ my ($class, $scfg, $storeid, $volname, $snap, $cleanup_worker) = @_;
my $format = ($class->parse_volname($volname))[6];
die "can't rollback snapshot for '$format' volume\n" if $format ne 'qcow2';
- my $cleanup_worker = eval { free_snap_image($class, $storeid, $scfg, $volname, 'current'); };
+ $cleanup_worker->$* = eval { free_snap_image($class, $storeid, $scfg, $volname, 'current'); };
die "error deleting snapshot $snap $@\n" if $@;
eval { alloc_snap_image($class, $storeid, $scfg, $volname, $snap) };
- my $alloc_err = $@;
-
- fork_cleanup_worker($cleanup_worker);
-
- if ($alloc_err) {
- die "can't allocate new volume $volname: $alloc_err\n";
- }
+ die "can't allocate new volume $volname: $@\n" if $@;
return undef;
}
@@ -1141,14 +1135,29 @@ my sub volume_snapshot_rollback_locked {
sub volume_snapshot_rollback {
my ($class, $scfg, $storeid, $volname, $snap) = @_;
- return $class->cluster_lock_storage(
- $storeid,
- $scfg->{shared},
- undef,
- sub {
- return volume_snapshot_rollback_locked($class, $scfg, $storeid, $volname, $snap);
- },
- );
+ my $cleanup_worker;
+
+ eval {
+ $class->cluster_lock_storage(
+ $storeid,
+ $scfg->{shared},
+ undef,
+ sub {
+ volume_snapshot_rollback_locked(
+ $class, $scfg, $storeid, $volname, $snap, \$cleanup_worker,
+ );
+ },
+ );
+ };
+ my $err = $@;
+
+ # Spawn outside of the locked section, because with 'saferemove', the cleanup worker also needs
+ # to obtain the lock, and in CLI context, it will be awaited synchronously, see fork_worker().
+ fork_cleanup_worker($cleanup_worker);
+
+ die $err if $err;
+
+ return;
}
sub volume_snapshot_delete {
--
2.47.3
_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
next reply other threads:[~2025-11-20 10:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-20 10:17 Fiona Ebner [this message]
2025-11-20 13:21 ` Fabian Grünbichler
2025-11-20 13:35 ` Fiona Ebner
2025-11-20 14:06 ` [pve-devel] applied: " Thomas Lamprecht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251120101742.24843-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com \
--to=f.ebner@proxmox.com \
--cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox