From: Stoiko Ivanov <s.ivanov@proxmox.com>
To: Friedrich Weber <f.weber@proxmox.com>
Cc: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH manager/docs 0/4] fix #2413: make target for ballooning configurable
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2025 14:47:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250404144718.5eb00240@rosa.proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250312151506.128311-1-f.weber@proxmox.com>
Thanks for the patch!
comments inline:
On Wed, 12 Mar 2025 16:15:02 +0100
Friedrich Weber <f.weber@proxmox.com> wrote:
> Automatic memory allocation (ballooning) is implemented in pvestatd, which
> assigns memory to or reclaims memory from eligible VMs in order to reach a
> certain target memory usage on the host. The target is currently hardcoded at
> 80%. Users have reported [1] that this target is unnecessarily low on hosts
> with large amounts of RAM.
>
> This patch series makes the ballooning target configurable. For this, it adds a
> new node config option `ballooning-target`. pvestatd then reads the target from
> that option.
>
> Some potential discussion points:
>
> - Is it OK to have this as a node option? I imagine some users may want to set
> different targets on different nodes. But other users may want to set one
> target for the whole cluster. Should we have a `ballooning-target` datacenter
> option that can be overridden by a `ballooning-target` node option? This might
> be overkill for such a simple option, though.
my initial thought would put this on the Datacenter-level (expecting most
nodes to be similarly specced - and thus have similar settings).
OTOH your approach gives the user more flexibility (if at the expense of
having to set that (via config-management or manually) for all nodes).
I think we could keep it on the node-level, and if there is demand for
this follow it up as you suggested:
node-setting > datacenter-setting > default(80%)
>
> - Instead of a `ballooning-target` option, should we go for some general
> `ballooning-settings` with a property string like `target=80`, in case we want
> to make other values (such as `$maxchange`, which is currently hardcoded at 100
> MiB) configurable in the future too?
we could cross that bridge when we get to it/when someone requests this
change (via versioned postinst renaming)? - at least I don't see the gain
- especially when it's in node.cfg.
and even if we have a datacenter.cfg-wide setting in a mixed-version
cluster while upgrading the config-parser would complain about an unknown
entry in a property-string as much as about an unknown setting IIRC?
>
> - In a mixed-version cluster where node 1 has this patch series and node 2
> doesn't yet, any attempt to change node 2's ballooning target from node 1's GUI
> will error out with `ballooning-target: property is not defined in schema`.
> This is not very nice, but not terrible either, as the error message is
> relatively descriptive. Still, is there an easy way to avoid this (checking
> client-side whether the option exists?)
I think the error-message is acceptable here (and nodes in a cluster
should run the same versions sooner rather than later anyways).
gave it a quick spin (by installing on my host, setting the target to 10%,
adding a `balloon` setting for a VM of mine and running `pvestatd start
--debug 1`, watching it inflate the balloon and the setting the target to
99%, watching it deflate it again).
For me this can be applied as-is:
Tested-by: Stoiko Ivanov <s.ivanov@proxmox.com>
Reviewed-by: Stoiko Ivanov <s.ivanov@proxmox.com>
>
> [1] https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2413
>
> manager:
>
> Friedrich Weber (3):
> node: options: add config option for ballooning target
> fix #2413: pvestatd: read ballooning RAM usage target from node config
> ui: node options: allow editing the ballooning RAM usage target
>
> PVE/NodeConfig.pm | 8 ++++++++
> PVE/Service/pvestatd.pm | 10 +++++++---
> www/manager6/node/NodeOptionsView.js | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
>
> docs:
>
> Friedrich Weber (1):
> pvenode: document ballooning-target node option
>
> pvenode.adoc | 13 +++++++++++++
> qm.adoc | 13 ++++++++-----
> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
>
> Summary over all repositories:
> 5 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-04 12:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-12 15:15 Friedrich Weber
2025-03-12 15:15 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH manager 1/4] node: options: add config option for ballooning target Friedrich Weber
2025-04-05 16:21 ` [pve-devel] applied-series: " Thomas Lamprecht
2025-03-12 15:15 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH manager 2/4] fix #2413: pvestatd: read ballooning RAM usage target from node config Friedrich Weber
2025-03-12 15:15 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH manager 3/4] ui: node options: allow editing the ballooning RAM usage target Friedrich Weber
2025-03-12 15:15 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH docs 4/4] pvenode: document ballooning-target node option Friedrich Weber
2025-04-04 12:47 ` Stoiko Ivanov [this message]
2025-04-04 13:02 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH manager/docs 0/4] fix #2413: make target for ballooning configurable Friedrich Weber
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250404144718.5eb00240@rosa.proxmox.com \
--to=s.ivanov@proxmox.com \
--cc=f.weber@proxmox.com \
--cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Service provided by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH | Privacy | Legal