public inbox for pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH qemu] add patch to fix deadlock with VirtIO block and iothread during QMP stop
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 14:01:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240221130152.81573-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> (raw)

Backported from commit bfa36802d1 ("virtio-blk: avoid using ioeventfd
state in irqfd conditional") because the rework/rename dataplane ->
ioeventfd didn't happen yet.

Reported in the community forum [0] and reproduced doing a backup loop
to PBS with suspend mode with fio doing heavy IO in the guest and
using an RBD storage (with krbd).

[0]: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/141320

Signed-off-by: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
---
 ...-using-ioeventfd-state-in-irqfd-cond.patch | 61 +++++++++++++++++++
 debian/patches/series                         |  1 +
 2 files changed, 62 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 debian/patches/extra/0013-virtio-blk-avoid-using-ioeventfd-state-in-irqfd-cond.patch

diff --git a/debian/patches/extra/0013-virtio-blk-avoid-using-ioeventfd-state-in-irqfd-cond.patch b/debian/patches/extra/0013-virtio-blk-avoid-using-ioeventfd-state-in-irqfd-cond.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..8109e7d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/debian/patches/extra/0013-virtio-blk-avoid-using-ioeventfd-state-in-irqfd-cond.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
+From 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
+Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 12:26:25 -0500
+Subject: [PATCH] virtio-blk: avoid using ioeventfd state in irqfd conditional
+
+Requests that complete in an IOThread use irqfd to notify the guest
+while requests that complete in the main loop thread use the traditional
+qdev irq code path. The reason for this conditional is that the irq code
+path requires the BQL:
+
+  if (s->ioeventfd_started && !s->ioeventfd_disabled) {
+      virtio_notify_irqfd(vdev, req->vq);
+  } else {
+      virtio_notify(vdev, req->vq);
+  }
+
+There is a corner case where the conditional invokes the irq code path
+instead of the irqfd code path:
+
+  static void virtio_blk_stop_ioeventfd(VirtIODevice *vdev)
+  {
+      ...
+      /*
+       * Set ->ioeventfd_started to false before draining so that host notifiers
+       * are not detached/attached anymore.
+       */
+      s->ioeventfd_started = false;
+
+      /* Wait for virtio_blk_dma_restart_bh() and in flight I/O to complete */
+      blk_drain(s->conf.conf.blk);
+
+During blk_drain() the conditional produces the wrong result because
+ioeventfd_started is false.
+
+Use qemu_in_iothread() instead of checking the ioeventfd state.
+
+Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
+Buglink: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-15394
+Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
+Message-ID: <20240122172625.415386-1-stefanha@redhat.com>
+Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
+Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
+[FE: backport: dataplane -> ioeventfd rework didn't happen yet]
+Signed-off-by: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
+---
+ hw/block/virtio-blk.c | 2 +-
+ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
+
+diff --git a/hw/block/virtio-blk.c b/hw/block/virtio-blk.c
+index 39e7f23fab..61bd1f6859 100644
+--- a/hw/block/virtio-blk.c
++++ b/hw/block/virtio-blk.c
+@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ static void virtio_blk_req_complete(VirtIOBlockReq *req, unsigned char status)
+     iov_discard_undo(&req->inhdr_undo);
+     iov_discard_undo(&req->outhdr_undo);
+     virtqueue_push(req->vq, &req->elem, req->in_len);
+-    if (s->dataplane_started && !s->dataplane_disabled) {
++    if (qemu_in_iothread()) {
+         virtio_blk_data_plane_notify(s->dataplane, req->vq);
+     } else {
+         virtio_notify(vdev, req->vq);
diff --git a/debian/patches/series b/debian/patches/series
index 4d75ec3..90553de 100644
--- a/debian/patches/series
+++ b/debian/patches/series
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ extra/0009-ui-clipboard-mark-type-as-not-available-when-there-i.patch
 extra/0010-virtio-scsi-Attach-event-vq-notifier-with-no_poll.patch
 extra/0011-virtio-Re-enable-notifications-after-drain.patch
 extra/0012-qemu_init-increase-NOFILE-soft-limit-on-POSIX.patch
+extra/0013-virtio-blk-avoid-using-ioeventfd-state-in-irqfd-cond.patch
 bitmap-mirror/0001-drive-mirror-add-support-for-sync-bitmap-mode-never.patch
 bitmap-mirror/0002-drive-mirror-add-support-for-conditional-and-always-.patch
 bitmap-mirror/0003-mirror-add-check-for-bitmap-mode-without-bitmap.patch
-- 
2.39.2





             reply	other threads:[~2024-02-21 13:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-21 13:01 Fiona Ebner [this message]
2024-02-21 19:18 ` [pve-devel] applied: " Thomas Lamprecht

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240221130152.81573-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com \
    --to=f.ebner@proxmox.com \
    --cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Service provided by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH | Privacy | Legal