* [pve-devel] [RFC manager] vzdump: exclude zfs control dirs by default
@ 2023-01-16 12:21 Fabian Grünbichler
2023-01-17 14:07 ` Stoiko Ivanov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Fabian Grünbichler @ 2023-01-16 12:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pve-devel
else in the face of snapdir=visible on a ZFS-backed mountpoint/rootfs, creating
stop mode backups will fail (because automounting on access of
.zfs/snapshot/XXX fails), and restoring a suspend mode backup onto a ZFS
storage will fail (because an attempt to `mkdir /path/to/target/.zfs/snapshot/XXX`
fails - or worse, if the "zfs_admin_snapshot" module parameter is enabled, will
create an XXX snapshot for the newly-restored dataset).
the two sub directories of .zfs were chosen to decrease the chance of false
positives, since backing up or restoring the .zfs dir itself is unproblematic.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
---
Notes:
see https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/restore-cannot-mkdir-permission-denied.121096
alternatively, this could also be handled in pve-container by checking for each
mountpoint and explicitly skipping .zfs only if that mountpoint is actually
backed by a ZFS storage..
if this patch is ACKed, the description of 'stdexcludes' in pve-guest-common should
probably also be updated..
PVE/VZDump.pm | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/PVE/VZDump.pm b/PVE/VZDump.pm
index a04837e7..9b9d37a8 100644
--- a/PVE/VZDump.pm
+++ b/PVE/VZDump.pm
@@ -542,6 +542,8 @@ sub new {
'/tmp/?*',
'/var/tmp/?*',
'/var/run/?*.pid',
+ '.zfs/snapshot',
+ '.zfs/shares',
;
}
--
2.30.2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [pve-devel] [RFC manager] vzdump: exclude zfs control dirs by default
2023-01-16 12:21 [pve-devel] [RFC manager] vzdump: exclude zfs control dirs by default Fabian Grünbichler
@ 2023-01-17 14:07 ` Stoiko Ivanov
2023-01-18 9:29 ` Fabian Grünbichler
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stoiko Ivanov @ 2023-01-17 14:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fabian Grünbichler; +Cc: Proxmox VE development discussion
Thanks for tackling this and providing the patch
LGTM code-wise and I think the potential for regression should be pretty
small (plus users who want this can always adapt the vzdump invocation).
small nit on the commit-message:
On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 13:21:20 +0100
Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com> wrote:
> else in the face of snapdir=visible on a ZFS-backed mountpoint/rootfs, creating
> stop mode backups will fail (because automounting on access of
> .zfs/snapshot/XXX fails), and restoring a suspend mode backup onto a ZFS
While trying to reproduce this for a quick test I was confused - until I
noticed - that the first backup in any mode (suspend/stop) always works,
it's from the second backup where suspend and stop fail
The reason is that the first backup automounts the/all snapshots in the
PVE node, and the second backup again triggers a mount (probably due to
the different mount namespace), which in turn fails (because the snapshot
is already mounted.
w/ w/o a potential adaptation of the commit message:
Tested-by: Stoiko Ivanov <s.ivanov@proxmox.com>
Reviewed-by: Stoiko Ivanov <s.ivanov@proxmox.com>
> storage will fail (because an attempt to `mkdir /path/to/target/.zfs/snapshot/XXX`
> fails - or worse, if the "zfs_admin_snapshot" module parameter is enabled, will
> create an XXX snapshot for the newly-restored dataset).
>
> the two sub directories of .zfs were chosen to decrease the chance of false
> positives, since backing up or restoring the .zfs dir itself is unproblematic.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
> ---
>
> Notes:
> see https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/restore-cannot-mkdir-permission-denied.121096
>
> alternatively, this could also be handled in pve-container by checking for each
> mountpoint and explicitly skipping .zfs only if that mountpoint is actually
> backed by a ZFS storage..
>
> if this patch is ACKed, the description of 'stdexcludes' in pve-guest-common should
> probably also be updated..
>
> PVE/VZDump.pm | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/PVE/VZDump.pm b/PVE/VZDump.pm
> index a04837e7..9b9d37a8 100644
> --- a/PVE/VZDump.pm
> +++ b/PVE/VZDump.pm
> @@ -542,6 +542,8 @@ sub new {
> '/tmp/?*',
> '/var/tmp/?*',
> '/var/run/?*.pid',
> + '.zfs/snapshot',
> + '.zfs/shares',
> ;
> }
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [pve-devel] [RFC manager] vzdump: exclude zfs control dirs by default
2023-01-17 14:07 ` Stoiko Ivanov
@ 2023-01-18 9:29 ` Fabian Grünbichler
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Fabian Grünbichler @ 2023-01-18 9:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stoiko Ivanov; +Cc: Proxmox VE development discussion
On January 17, 2023 3:07 pm, Stoiko Ivanov wrote:
> Thanks for tackling this and providing the patch
>
> LGTM code-wise and I think the potential for regression should be pretty
> small (plus users who want this can always adapt the vzdump invocation).
>
> small nit on the commit-message:
>
> On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 13:21:20 +0100
> Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com> wrote:
>
>> else in the face of snapdir=visible on a ZFS-backed mountpoint/rootfs, creating
>> stop mode backups will fail (because automounting on access of
>> .zfs/snapshot/XXX fails), and restoring a suspend mode backup onto a ZFS
>
> While trying to reproduce this for a quick test I was confused - until I
> noticed - that the first backup in any mode (suspend/stop) always works,
> it's from the second backup where suspend and stop fail
>
> The reason is that the first backup automounts the/all snapshots in the
> PVE node, and the second backup again triggers a mount (probably due to
> the different mount namespace), which in turn fails (because the snapshot
> is already mounted.
we did some more testing, and it's actually a tad bit more complicated..
so I'd adapt the commit message to say
else in the face of snapdir=visible on a ZFS-backed mountpoint/rootfs, creating
stop or suspend mode backups will fail under certain circumstances (because
automounting on access of .zfs/snapshot/XXX fails), and restoring a
(successful) backup made in suspend mode onto a ZFS storage will fail (because
an attempt to `mkdir /path/to/target/.zfs/snapshot/XXX` fails - or worse, if the
"zfs_admin_snapshot" module parameter is enabled, will create an XXX snapshot
for the newly-restored dataset).
the exact failure modes are as follows:
- suspend mode backups work, as long as the container is not restarted between
backups and only suspend mode is used
- suspend mode backups fail if snapshots have been auto-mounted and the
auto-mount was triggered outside the currently running container instance (i.e.,
by a stop mode backup, directly on the host, before a container reboot, ..)
- first stop mode backup is fine, if no snapshots have been auto-mounted yet
- stop mode backup fails if auto-mounting has happened in any fashion before the
backup was started
>
> w/ w/o a potential adaptation of the commit message:
> Tested-by: Stoiko Ivanov <s.ivanov@proxmox.com>
> Reviewed-by: Stoiko Ivanov <s.ivanov@proxmox.com>
>
>> storage will fail (because an attempt to `mkdir /path/to/target/.zfs/snapshot/XXX`
>> fails - or worse, if the "zfs_admin_snapshot" module parameter is enabled, will
>> create an XXX snapshot for the newly-restored dataset).
>>
>> the two sub directories of .zfs were chosen to decrease the chance of false
>> positives, since backing up or restoring the .zfs dir itself is unproblematic.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Notes:
>> see https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/restore-cannot-mkdir-permission-denied.121096
>>
>> alternatively, this could also be handled in pve-container by checking for each
>> mountpoint and explicitly skipping .zfs only if that mountpoint is actually
>> backed by a ZFS storage..
>>
>> if this patch is ACKed, the description of 'stdexcludes' in pve-guest-common should
>> probably also be updated..
>>
>> PVE/VZDump.pm | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/PVE/VZDump.pm b/PVE/VZDump.pm
>> index a04837e7..9b9d37a8 100644
>> --- a/PVE/VZDump.pm
>> +++ b/PVE/VZDump.pm
>> @@ -542,6 +542,8 @@ sub new {
>> '/tmp/?*',
>> '/var/tmp/?*',
>> '/var/run/?*.pid',
>> + '.zfs/snapshot',
>> + '.zfs/shares',
>> ;
>> }
>>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-01-18 9:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-01-16 12:21 [pve-devel] [RFC manager] vzdump: exclude zfs control dirs by default Fabian Grünbichler
2023-01-17 14:07 ` Stoiko Ivanov
2023-01-18 9:29 ` Fabian Grünbichler
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox