public inbox for pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oguz Bektas <o.bektas@proxmox.com>
To: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Cc: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH v2 container] fix #3313: recover unprivileged bit from old config during pct restore
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 15:36:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210223143640.GB10131@gaia.proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <72b18013-81ac-35a5-0055-d76297ff02ec@proxmox.com>

hi,

On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 03:21:28PM +0100, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
> On 23.02.21 13:29, Oguz Bektas wrote:
> > since pct defaults to privileged containers, it restores the container
> > as privileged when `--unprivileged 1` is not passed.
> > 
> > instead we should check the old configuration and retrieve it
> > from there.
> > 
> > this way, when one creates an unprivileged container on GUI, it will be
> > still restored as unprivileged via pct (without having to pass
> > `--unprivileged 1` parameter)
> > 
> 
> please note the effects of your change to `if ($is_root && $archive ne '-') {`
> Fabi describes, pick up his R-b/T-b tag and send a v3 with the style comments
> below addressed.

will do

> 
> > Signed-off-by: Oguz Bektas <o.bektas@proxmox.com>
> > ---
> > v1->v2:
> > * move the $is_root guard
> > * wrap line to make it shorter
> > * shorten comment
> > * use () around defined
> > * also check defined($orig_conf->{unprivileged})
> > 
> > 
> >  src/PVE/API2/LXC.pm | 8 ++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/src/PVE/API2/LXC.pm b/src/PVE/API2/LXC.pm
> > index 8ce462f..3d3dbb0 100644
> > --- a/src/PVE/API2/LXC.pm
> > +++ b/src/PVE/API2/LXC.pm
> > @@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method({
> >  		my $orig_mp_param; # only used if $restore
> >  		if ($restore) {
> >  		    die "can't overwrite running container\n" if PVE::LXC::check_running($vmid);
> > -		    if ($is_root && $archive ne '-') {
> > +		    if ($archive ne '-') {
> >  			my $orig_conf;
> >  			print "recovering backed-up configuration from '$archive'\n";
> >  			($orig_conf, $orig_mp_param) = PVE::LXC::Create::recover_config($storage_cfg, $archive, $vmid);
> > @@ -361,7 +361,11 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method({
> >  			# causing it to restore the raw lxc entries, among which there may be
> >  			# 'lxc.idmap' entries. We need to make sure that the extracted contents
> >  			# of the container match up with the restored configuration afterwards:
> > -			$conf->{lxc} = $orig_conf->{lxc};
> > +			$conf->{lxc} = $orig_conf->{lxc} if $is_root;
> > +
> > +			# make sure to retrieve the privilege level of container if not specified
> 
> Does this really adds any value in your opinion? It IMO adds even some confusion
> as its not clear where has to be "not specified"... I'd really just drop it.

i adapt it to:
# retrieve the privilege level of container if cli parameter was not passed

otherwise i think it's not super obvious what's going on, since this
part of the code has a lot of special cases

> 
> 
> > +			$conf->{unprivileged} = $orig_conf->{unprivileged} if !defined($unprivileged)
> > +			    && defined($orig_conf->{unprivileged});
> 
> that's not how we wrap lines for post ifs, as you can se from looking at any code
> of ours...
> 
> Wrote it now also down as more definite rule in the Perl Style Guide
> https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Perl_Style_Guide#Wrapping_Post-If

ok thank you
> 
> >  		    }
> >  		}
> >  		if ($storage_only_mode) {
> > 
> 




  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-23 14:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-23 12:29 Oguz Bektas
2021-02-23 14:19 ` Fabian Ebner
2021-02-23 14:21 ` Thomas Lamprecht
2021-02-23 14:36   ` Oguz Bektas [this message]
2021-02-23 14:49     ` Thomas Lamprecht

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210223143640.GB10131@gaia.proxmox.com \
    --to=o.bektas@proxmox.com \
    --cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
    --cc=t.lamprecht@proxmox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Service provided by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH | Privacy | Legal