public inbox for pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com, Gabriel Goller <g.goller@proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH frr 0/2] Fix leaked EVPN routes having wrong nexthop on IPv4 via IPv6 routes
Date: Sun, 17 May 2026 01:59:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <177897588452.770468.5372557993508508653.b4-ty@b4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260515152400.726794-1-g.goller@proxmox.com>

On Fri, 15 May 2026 17:23:55 +0200, Gabriel Goller wrote:
> When we have a EVPN fabric with IPv6 VTEPs and leak them into the default
> routing table (or any other VRF) (via exit-nodes in our case) the nexthop is
> wrong. The nexthop is correct in the vrf (e.g. `ip route show vrf vrf_evpn`) but
> the import-vrf does not correctly check the BGP MP properties for the IPv6
> nexthop and inserts a invalid (0.0.0.0) IPv4 nexthop. The BGP MP properties are
> not checked because a legacy bgp flag is set (BGP_ATTR_NEXT_HOP), which
> circumvents the BGP MP check.
> 
> [...]

Smoke-Tested in a peer-to-peer EVPN setup over an IPv6 underlay: a type-3 route
from a v6 VTEP propagates to the peer with the v6 nexthop preserved, looked all
ok and improves the stats quo, so after some longer consideration:

Applied, thanks!

[1/2] frr: backport #21166 and #21958, fixing EVPN IPv4 routes with IPv6 nexhtop
      commit: 1e04e21152138c90ba9c612707a95c5fb48cf9d6
[2/2] bump to version 10.6.1-1+pve2
      commit: 9f188e1b4459edfd6174aa1ad48ee4ab6bde7749




      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-05-17  0:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-15 15:23 [PATCH frr 0/2] Fix leaked EVPN routes having wrong nexthop on IPv4 via IPv6 routes Gabriel Goller
2026-05-15 15:23 ` [PATCH frr 1/2] frr: backport #21166 and #21958, fixing EVPN IPv4 routes with IPv6 nexhtop Gabriel Goller
2026-05-15 16:06   ` Gabriel Goller
2026-05-15 15:23 ` [PATCH frr 2/2] bump to version 10.6.1-1+pve2 Gabriel Goller
2026-05-16 23:59 ` Thomas Lamprecht [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=177897588452.770468.5372557993508508653.b4-ty@b4 \
    --to=t.lamprecht@proxmox.com \
    --cc=g.goller@proxmox.com \
    --cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Service provided by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH | Privacy | Legal