public inbox for pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Fabian Grünbichler" <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH storage 1/2] zfs: only use cache when listing images locally
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 12:18:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1668596522.lpeo4rqk2k.astroid@yuna.none> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221107110035.93972-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>

On November 7, 2022 12:00 pm, Fiona Ebner wrote:
> The plugin for remote ZFS storages currently also uses the same
> list_images() as the plugin for local ZFS storages. The issue with
> this is that there is only one cache which does not remember the
> target host where the information originated.
> 
> Simply restrict the cache to be used for the local ZFS plugin only. An
> alternative solution would be to use a cache for each target host, but
> that seems a bit more involved and could still be added in the future.

wouldn't it be sufficient to just do

$cache->{zfs}->{$storeid}

when filling/querying the cache, and combining that with *always* listing only
the storage-relevant pool?

the only case where we actually benefit from listing *all* zfs volumes/datasets
is when
- there are multiple storages configured referencing overlapping parts of the
ZFS hierarchy
- vdisk_list is called with a volume_list with multiple such storages being part
of the set, or with $vmid but no $storeid (rescan, or purging unreferenced guest
disks on guest removal)

in practice, it likely doesn't make much difference since ZFS should cache the
metadata for the overlapping parts in memory anyway (given that we'd then call
'zfs list' in a loop with different starting points).

whereas, for most regular cases listing happens without a cache anyway (or with
a cache, but only a single storage involved), so there is no benefit in querying
volumes belonging to other storages since we are not interested in them anyway.

sidenote: it seems like vdisk_list's volume_list is not used anywhere as parameter?

> 
> For example, issues can happen during rescan:
> 1. Via list_images() and zfs_list_zvol(), ZFSPlugin.pm's zfs_request()
>    is executed for a remote ZFS.
> 2. $cache->{zfs} is set to the result of scanning the images there.
> 3. Another list_images() for a local ZFS storage happens and uses the
>    cache with the wrong information.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>




  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-11-16 11:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-07 11:00 Fiona Ebner
2022-11-07 11:00 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH storage 2/2] zfs: list zvol: list single pool only for remote ZFS Fiona Ebner
2022-11-16 11:18 ` Fabian Grünbichler [this message]
2022-11-16 13:30   ` [pve-devel] [PATCH storage 1/2] zfs: only use cache when listing images locally Fiona Ebner
2022-11-28 12:19     ` Fiona Ebner
2022-11-29  9:50       ` Fabian Grünbichler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1668596522.lpeo4rqk2k.astroid@yuna.none \
    --to=f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com \
    --cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Service provided by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH | Privacy | Legal