From: "Fabian Grünbichler" <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH v1 container 3/5] fix #2582: api: add checks for 'SuperUser' privilege for root-only options
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 16:30:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1644493686.5emiz9u4bh.astroid@nora.none> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <<20220208131011.752134-4-o.bektas@proxmox.com>
On February 8, 2022 2:10 pm, Oguz Bektas wrote:
> this way we can allow non-root users to act as a SU on specific
> root-only API paths by giving them the built-in SA role or a custom role
> with the SU privilege included.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oguz Bektas <o.bektas@proxmox.com>
> ---
> src/PVE/API2/LXC.pm | 13 ++++++-------
> src/PVE/API2/LXC/Status.pm | 8 ++++++--
> src/PVE/LXC.pm | 9 ++++++---
> 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/PVE/API2/LXC.pm b/src/PVE/API2/LXC.pm
> index 7573814..b24e405 100644
> --- a/src/PVE/API2/LXC.pm
> +++ b/src/PVE/API2/LXC.pm
> @@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method({
>
> my $conf = {};
>
> - my $is_root = $authuser eq 'root@pam';
> + my $is_superuser = $authuser eq 'root@pam' || $rpcenv->check($authuser, "/vms/$vmid", ['SuperUser'], 1);
>
> my $no_disk_param = {};
> my $mp_param = {};
> @@ -330,8 +330,8 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method({
> my $mp = $mountpoint->{mp};
>
> if ($mountpoint->{type} ne 'volume') { # bind or device
> - die "Only root can pass arbitrary filesystem paths.\n"
> - if !$is_root;
> + die "Only superusers can pass arbitrary filesystem paths.\n"
> + if !$is_superuser;
schema still has root-only in the description, both here and in the
update path..
> } else {
> my ($sid, $volname) = PVE::Storage::parse_volume_id($volid);
> &$check_and_activate_storage($sid);
> @@ -371,7 +371,7 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method({
> # causing it to restore the raw lxc entries, among which there may be
> # 'lxc.idmap' entries. We need to make sure that the extracted contents
> # of the container match up with the restored configuration afterwards:
> - $conf->{lxc} = $orig_conf->{lxc} if $is_root;
> + $conf->{lxc} = $orig_conf->{lxc} if $is_superuser;
>
> $conf->{unprivileged} = $orig_conf->{unprivileged}
> if !defined($unprivileged) && defined($orig_conf->{unprivileged});
> @@ -405,8 +405,7 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method({
> my $type = $mountpoint->{type};
> die "restoring rootfs to $type mount is only possible by specifying -rootfs manually!\n"
> if ($ms eq 'rootfs');
> - die "restoring '$ms' to $type mount is only possible for root\n"
> - if !$is_root;
> + die "restoring '$ms' to $type mount is only possible for root\n" if !$is_superuser;
still references root
>
> if ($mountpoint->{backup}) {
> warn "WARNING - unsupported configuration!\n";
> @@ -447,7 +446,7 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method({
>
> if ($restore) {
> print "merging backed-up and given configuration..\n";
> - PVE::LXC::Create::restore_configuration($vmid, $storage_cfg, $archive, $rootdir, $conf, !$is_root, $unique, $skip_fw_config_restore);
> + PVE::LXC::Create::restore_configuration($vmid, $storage_cfg, $archive, $rootdir, $conf, !$is_superuser, $unique, $skip_fw_config_restore);
> my $lxc_setup = PVE::LXC::Setup->new($conf, $rootdir);
> $lxc_setup->template_fixup($conf);
> } else {
> diff --git a/src/PVE/API2/LXC/Status.pm b/src/PVE/API2/LXC/Status.pm
> index f7e3128..791cdc6 100644
> --- a/src/PVE/API2/LXC/Status.pm
> +++ b/src/PVE/API2/LXC/Status.pm
> @@ -150,9 +150,11 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method({
> my $node = extract_param($param, 'node');
> my $vmid = extract_param($param, 'vmid');
>
> + my $is_superuser = $authuser eq 'root@pam' || $rpcenv->check($authuser, "/vms/$vmid", ['SuperUser'], 1);
> +
> my $skiplock = extract_param($param, 'skiplock');
> raise_param_exc({ skiplock => "Only root may use this option." })
nit: message needs updating (repeated a few times below)
> - if $skiplock && $authuser ne 'root@pam';
> + if $skiplock && !$is_superuser;
>
> die "CT $vmid already running\n" if PVE::LXC::check_running($vmid);
>
> @@ -234,9 +236,11 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method({
> my $node = extract_param($param, 'node');
> my $vmid = extract_param($param, 'vmid');
>
> + my $is_superuser = $authuser eq 'root@pam' || $rpcenv->check($authuser, "/vms/$vmid", ['SuperUser'], 1);
> +
> my $skiplock = extract_param($param, 'skiplock');
> raise_param_exc({ skiplock => "Only root may use this option." })
> - if $skiplock && $authuser ne 'root@pam';
> + if $skiplock && !$is_superuser;
>
> die "CT $vmid not running\n" if !PVE::LXC::check_running($vmid);
>
> diff --git a/src/PVE/LXC.pm b/src/PVE/LXC.pm
> index b07d986..6b5125c 100644
> --- a/src/PVE/LXC.pm
> +++ b/src/PVE/LXC.pm
> @@ -1254,7 +1254,9 @@ sub template_create {
> sub check_ct_modify_config_perm {
> my ($rpcenv, $authuser, $vmid, $pool, $oldconf, $newconf, $delete, $unprivileged) = @_;
>
> - return 1 if $authuser eq 'root@pam';
> + my $is_superuser = $authuser eq 'root@pam' || $rpcenv->check($authuser, "/vms/$vmid", ['SuperUser']);
> + return 1 if $is_superuser;
so.. 'SuperUser' on its own should only skip those parts where root@pam
was previously a requirement on top of other checks, but instead
'SuperUser' can now modify the config however even with no other privs?
> +
> my $storage_cfg = PVE::Storage::config();
>
> my $check = sub {
> @@ -1320,12 +1322,13 @@ sub check_ct_modify_config_perm {
here there is the non-volume part that is still root-only, with no
comment about why that one is not switched to 'SuperUser'?
also, features for privileged containers is still root-only (should
probably require VM.Allocate + SuperUser, when looking at the
create/restore path).
> }
> }
> raise_perm_exc("changing feature flags (except nesting) is only allowed for root\@pam")
wrong message now
> - if $other_changed;
> + if $other_changed && !$is_superuser;
> $rpcenv->check_vm_perm($authuser, $vmid, $pool, ['VM.Allocate'])
> if $nesting_changed;
> } elsif ($opt eq 'hookscript') {
> # For now this is restricted to root@pam
> - raise_perm_exc("changing the hookscript is only allowed for root\@pam");
> + raise_perm_exc("changing the hookscript is only allowed for root\@pam")
> + if !$is_superuser;
comment, message and code don't agree
> } else {
> $rpcenv->check_vm_perm($authuser, $vmid, $pool, ['VM.Config.Options']);
> }
> --
> 2.30.2
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pve-devel mailing list
> pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-10 15:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-08 13:10 [pve-devel] [PATCH v1 access-control++ 0/5] SuperUser privilege Oguz Bektas
2022-02-08 13:10 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH v1 access-control 1/5] add default "SuperAdministrator" role with the new "SuperUser" privilege Oguz Bektas
2022-02-08 13:10 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH v1 access-control 2/5] tfa: allow superusers to edit root@pam tfa Oguz Bektas
[not found] ` <<20220208131011.752134-3-o.bektas@proxmox.com>
2022-02-10 15:30 ` Fabian Grünbichler
2022-02-08 13:10 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH v1 container 3/5] fix #2582: api: add checks for 'SuperUser' privilege for root-only options Oguz Bektas
[not found] ` <<20220208131011.752134-4-o.bektas@proxmox.com>
2022-02-10 15:30 ` Fabian Grünbichler [this message]
2022-02-08 13:10 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH v1 manager 4/5] change 'root@pam' checks with 'SuperUser' capability check Oguz Bektas
[not found] ` <<20220208131011.752134-5-o.bektas@proxmox.com>
2022-02-10 15:29 ` Fabian Grünbichler
2022-02-25 10:13 ` Dominik Csapak
2022-02-25 12:24 ` Thomas Lamprecht
2022-02-08 13:10 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH v1 qemu-server 5/5] add SuperUser privilege checks for root-only options Oguz Bektas
[not found] ` <<20220208131011.752134-6-o.bektas@proxmox.com>
2022-02-10 15:29 ` Fabian Grünbichler
2022-02-10 15:28 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH v1 access-control++ 0/5] SuperUser privilege Fabian Grünbichler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1644493686.5emiz9u4bh.astroid@nora.none \
--to=f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com \
--cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox