From: "Fabian Grünbichler" <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH manager 1/3] close #3476: allow user to prepare storage for activation in job-start hook
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 12:46:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1642159551.i8ghw8jx3f.astroid@nora.none> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211202110005.38699-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
while the approach in this series works, I am a bit unhappy about the
fact that it requires a cfs_update in the (sort of) middle of a worker,
after having already parsed vmlist and storage.cfg (and making decisions
based on their contents / saving intermediate results for using later on
in the process).
as an alternative, wouldn't calling the hook script either directly
after forking the vzdump worker (in the API) or somewhere at the start
of PVE::VZDump->new() work as well? e.g., with a new 'phase' 'job-setup'
or 'job-init' and just storage/dumpdir and script set. IMHO a sensible
point would be before the `if ($opts->{storage}) {` in new() that this
series touches - we have the basic, simple opts handled at that point,
but haven't started any of the logic/active parts of the initialization
of the vzdump job, so we are still okay to do a cfs_update without
worrying about subtle side-effects. and since it would be a new phase,
we can just document that the storage might not be activated yet at that
point. obviously this approach is also a bit hacky (run_hookscript
supposedly takes a PVE::VZDump instance which doesn't exist yet at this
point ;)), but it seems less involved / with less potential for
side-effects than the current one?
On December 2, 2021 12:00 pm, Fabian Ebner wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
> ---
> PVE/VZDump.pm | 11 +++++++----
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/PVE/VZDump.pm b/PVE/VZDump.pm
> index b5a5fadd..667c92d3 100644
> --- a/PVE/VZDump.pm
> +++ b/PVE/VZDump.pm
> @@ -501,11 +501,8 @@ sub new {
>
> if ($opts->{storage}) {
> my $storage_cfg = PVE::Storage::config();
> + # Ignore errors here. exec_backup will die if activation fails there.
> eval { PVE::Storage::activate_storage($storage_cfg, $opts->{storage}) };
> - if (my $err = $@) {
> - chomp($err);
> - $errors .= "could not activate storage '$opts->{storage}': $err";
> - }
>
> my $info = eval { storage_info ($opts->{storage}) };
> if (my $err = $@) {
> @@ -1168,6 +1165,12 @@ sub exec_backup {
>
> $self->run_hook_script ('job-start', undef, $job_start_fd);
>
> + my $storage_cfg = PVE::Storage::config();
> +
> + # activating after job-start hook, so it has a chance to prepare, e.g. wake up remote node.
> + eval { PVE::Storage::activate_storage($storage_cfg, $opts->{storage}) };
> + die "could not activate storage '$opts->{storage}': $@" if $@;
> +
> foreach my $task (@$tasklist) {
> $self->exec_backup_task ($task);
> $errcount += 1 if $task->{state} ne 'ok';
> --
> 2.30.2
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pve-devel mailing list
> pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-14 11:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-02 11:00 Fabian Ebner
2021-12-02 11:00 ` [pve-devel] [RFC manager 2/3] vzdump: exec_backup: pick up latest version of storage.cfg after " Fabian Ebner
2021-12-02 11:00 ` [pve-devel] [RFC manager 3/3] vzdump: new: add reminder to get rid of duplicate activate_storage Fabian Ebner
2022-01-14 11:46 ` Fabian Grünbichler [this message]
2022-01-14 12:39 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH manager 1/3] close #3476: allow user to prepare storage for activation in job-start hook Fabian Ebner
2022-01-14 13:07 ` Fabian Grünbichler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1642159551.i8ghw8jx3f.astroid@nora.none \
--to=f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com \
--cc=f.ebner@proxmox.com \
--cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox