public inbox for pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Giray Pultar <giray@pultar.org>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Subject: [BUG] PCIe passthrough devices invisible on q35 with non-sequential hostpci numbering (two related issues)
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2026 16:38:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <11ce85d1-eb5d-48d1-a4ba-046424613f29@pultar.org> (raw)


Package: pve-manager
Version: 9.2.3
pve-qemu-kvm: 11.0.0-4
proxmox-kernel: 7.0.6-2-pve
Machine type: q35

## Summary

When PCI passthrough devices use non-sequential hostpci numbers (e.g.,
hostpci0,1,2,3,7,9) with pcie=1 on a q35 machine type, the devices at
higher indices become completely invisible to the guest OS. This is caused
by two related issues in qemu-server and proxmox-ve.


## Issue 1: qemu-server places PCIe root ports at invalid addresses

### Steps to Reproduce

1. Create a q35 VM with more than 4 PCIe passthrough devices
2. Use non-sequential hostpci numbering, e.g.:
    hostpci0: mapping=devA,pcie=1
    hostpci1: mapping=devB,pcie=1
    hostpci2: mapping=devC,pcie=1
    hostpci3: mapping=devD,pcie=1
    hostpci7: mapping=devE,pcie=1
    hostpci9: mapping=devF,pcie=1
3. Start the VM
4. Observe that hostpci7 and hostpci9 are invisible in the guest

### Actual Behavior

Only hostpci0-3 appear. The remaining devices get dynamically-created
PCIe root ports at addresses such as:

   pcie-root-port,id=ich9-pcie-port-8,addr=10.3,bus=pcie.0,port=8,chassis=8
  
pcie-root-port,id=ich9-pcie-port-10,addr=10.5,bus=pcie.0,port=10,chassis=10

These map to PCI slot 0x10 (decimal 16), functions 3 and 5. No device
exists at function 0 of this slot. Per the PCI specification, function 0
must be present before the OS will scan higher functions. The guest never
discovers these root ports, and the devices behind them are invisible.

Guest dmesg confirms empty buses:
   pci_bus 0000:07: extended config space not accessible
   pci_bus 0000:08: extended config space not accessible

### Expected Behavior

All PCIe passthrough devices should appear in the guest regardless of
the hostpciN index numbering.

### Suggested Fix

qemu-server's PCI address allocation logic for dynamically-created PCIe
root ports should either:
   - Place each root port at its own slot with function 0, or
   - Create a placeholder function 0 when using multifunction, or
   - Avoid multifunction grouping for root ports without function 0


## Issue 2: proxmox-ve does not keep hostpci numbering sequential

### Problem Description

When a PCI passthrough device is removed from the middle of a sequence,
Proxmox VE does not renumber the remaining devices to fill the gap:

Before removal of devC (hostpci2):
   hostpci0: mapping=devA
   hostpci1: mapping=devB
   hostpci2: mapping=devC
   hostpci3: mapping=devD
   hostpci4: mapping=devE
   hostpci5: mapping=devF

After removal:
   hostpci0: mapping=devA
   hostpci1: mapping=devB
   hostpci3: mapping=devD
   hostpci4: mapping=devE
   hostpci5: mapping=devF

The gap at hostpci2 persists. These gaps directly trigger Issue 1 above.

### Expected Behavior

Proxmox VE should either:
   1. Automatically renumber hostpci devices sequentially (0,1,2,...)
      when a device is removed, or
   2. Provide a CLI/API command to compact/renumber PCI device indices, or
   3. At minimum, warn the user when non-sequential numbering is detected

### Suggested Solution

Renumber hostpci entries automatically when a device is removed via
the GUI or `qm set --delete hostpciN`, preventing gaps from accumulating.

## Workaround (for both issues)

Manually renumber hostpci devices to be sequential (0,1,2,3,4,5)
instead of using non-sequential numbers.


Giray



             reply	other threads:[~2026-06-23 10:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-22 14:38 Giray Pultar [this message]
2026-06-23 12:02 ` [BUG] PCIe passthrough devices invisible on q35 with non-sequential hostpci numbering (two related issues) Dominik Csapak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=11ce85d1-eb5d-48d1-a4ba-046424613f29@pultar.org \
    --to=giray@pultar.org \
    --cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Service provided by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH | Privacy | Legal