From: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
To: Elias Huhsovitz <e.huhsovitz@proxmox.com>, pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH storage] plugins: better document how volname_for_format() validates the name
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2026 15:12:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <119ff822-2794-4dff-be99-4c0e6f813542@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DLYMBOZP5C5O.21DF6UA8HKFYG@proxmox.com>
Am 07.10.26 um 2:51 PM schrieb Elias Huhsovitz:
> I think the comments here are fine, but I would prefer this should be
> documented in the POD for the respective subroutines.
>
> Both parse_name_dir & (espeically) parse_volname would also benefit
> from a proper POD.
Yes, but that is out-of-scope for this patch. Max has been working on
documenting the storage plugin interface properly. This patch is for
better documenting how the volname_for_format() implementations achieve
validation, and even if parse_{name_dir,volname} had proper POD, the
added comments inline are better suited for making it explicit/readable
how validation is achieved here IMHO.
>
> See small comments inlinde.
>
> On Mon Oct 5, 2026 at 1:04 PM CEST, Fiona Ebner wrote:
>> In particular, there is a requirement for get_parsed_format() to
>> return a format only if it validated the name. Mention it explicitly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
>> ---
>> src/PVE/Storage/Plugin.pm | 5 +++--
>> src/PVE/Storage/ZFSPoolPlugin.pm | 3 ++-
>> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/PVE/Storage/Plugin.pm b/src/PVE/Storage/Plugin.pm
>> index 8318a68..e2025f8 100644
>> --- a/src/PVE/Storage/Plugin.pm
>> +++ b/src/PVE/Storage/Plugin.pm
>> @@ -851,7 +851,7 @@ sub parse_volname {
>> =head3 get_parsed_format
>>
>> Return the disk format encoded in the given volume name, or C<undef> if the name does not spell one
>> -out.
>> +out. If a format is returned, the name must have been validated.
>>
>> This is an extension point for plugins whose volume names encode the format differently. ZFS
>> derives it from the name prefix via C<parse_volname>, while LVM and RBD take it from a known file
>> @@ -866,7 +866,7 @@ sub get_parsed_format {
>>
>> return undef if $name !~ m/\.[^.]+$/; # no extension, so no format is spelled out
>>
>> - return (parse_name_dir($name))[1];
>> + return (parse_name_dir($name))[1]; # dies for invalid volume file names
>
> We could add this information inside the POD of the function.
>
> Similarly to how javadoc has the @throws annonation.
>
>> }
>>
>> sub is_valid_format {
>> @@ -904,6 +904,7 @@ sub volname_for_format {
>>
>> my $parsed_volname_fmt = $class->get_parsed_format($name);
>>
>> + # Note that get_parsed_format() validates the name if it has a format extension.
>> return $name if defined($parsed_volname_fmt) && $parsed_volname_fmt eq $fmt;
>>
>> my $suggestion = $class->volname_with_format($name, $fmt);
>> diff --git a/src/PVE/Storage/ZFSPoolPlugin.pm b/src/PVE/Storage/ZFSPoolPlugin.pm
>> index 61c49d9..e7cd1de 100644
>> --- a/src/PVE/Storage/ZFSPoolPlugin.pm
>> +++ b/src/PVE/Storage/ZFSPoolPlugin.pm
>> @@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ sub parse_volname {
>> sub get_parsed_format {
>> my ($class, $name) = @_;
>>
>> - return ($class->parse_volname($name))[6];
>> + return ($class->parse_volname($name))[6]; # dies for invalid volume names
>
> Same here, I belive this belongs in the POD, as part of the "contract".
>
>> }
>>
>> # ZFS volume names always encode their format in the name prefix (vm- for raw
>> @@ -170,6 +170,7 @@ sub volname_for_format {
>>
>> die "unsupported format '$fmt'\n" if !($class->is_valid_format($fmt));
>>
>> + # Note that get_parsed_format() validates the name.
>> my $name_fmt = $class->get_parsed_format($name);
>> return $name if $name_fmt eq $fmt;
>>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-07 13:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-05 11:04 [PATCH storage] plugins: better document how volname_for_format() validates the name Fiona Ebner
2026-10-07 12:51 ` Elias Huhsovitz
2026-10-07 13:12 ` Fiona Ebner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=119ff822-2794-4dff-be99-4c0e6f813542@proxmox.com \
--to=f.ebner@proxmox.com \
--cc=e.huhsovitz@proxmox.com \
--cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox