public inbox for pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: alexandre derumier <aderumier@odiso.com>
To: px@jack.fr.eu.org,
	Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH] controllers: bgp: enable multihop on the underlay
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2021 12:37:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0fb8950c-458f-72f0-7d26-c8d2a5492671@odiso.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <58e94720-ffc9-23a6-2168-850d18de4943@jack.fr.eu.org>

I just send a patch with an explicit option to add ebgp-multihop, as

it's a tunable value, and maybe users could have differents setup with 
more hops.


On 09/04/2021 17:40, px@jack.fr.eu.org wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In Proxmox setup, there is no known serious issue
>
> In contrary to "ttl security" (aka GTSM), multihop is not a security 
> feature
>
> I don't think there is a drawback to the proposed patch
> However, disabling multihop when there is only one peer should also 
> works, so your proposal shall work as well
>
> As you wish :)
>
> Best regards,
>
> On 4/9/21 3:50 PM, alexandre derumier wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> any impact to enable it by default ?
>>
>> if user have only 1 peer for example ?
>>
>> maybe is is better to only enable it if we have more than 1 peer in 
>> the group ?
>>
>> and check that we use ebgp.
>>
>> something like:
>>
>> push @controller_config, "neighbor BGP ebgp-multihop 3" if $ebgp && 
>> scalar @peers > 1;
>>
>>
>> On 09/04/2021 14:21, Alexandre Bruyelles wrote:
>>> From: Alexandre Bruyelles <git@jack.fr.eu.org>
>>>
>>> Multihop is required when the bgpd are running across
>>> a pair of MLAG routers.
>>> In such scenario, TCP trafic from Proxmox to router A
>>> may pass through router B, which will decrease the TTL.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Bruyelles <git@jack.fr.eu.org>
>>> ---
>>>   PVE/Network/SDN/Controllers/BgpPlugin.pm | 1 +
>>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/PVE/Network/SDN/Controllers/BgpPlugin.pm 
>>> b/PVE/Network/SDN/Controllers/BgpPlugin.pm
>>> index e5d8490..69436a0 100644
>>> --- a/PVE/Network/SDN/Controllers/BgpPlugin.pm
>>> +++ b/PVE/Network/SDN/Controllers/BgpPlugin.pm
>>> @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ sub generate_controller_config {
>>>       push @controller_config, "neighbor BGP peer-group";
>>>       push @controller_config, "neighbor BGP remote-as $remoteas";
>>>       push @controller_config, "neighbor BGP bfd";
>>> +    push @controller_config, "neighbor BGP ebgp-multihop 3";
>>>       }
>>>       # BGP peers
>



      reply	other threads:[~2021-04-10 10:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-09 12:21 Alexandre Bruyelles
2021-04-09 13:50 ` alexandre derumier
2021-04-09 15:40   ` px
2021-04-10 10:37     ` alexandre derumier [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0fb8950c-458f-72f0-7d26-c8d2a5492671@odiso.com \
    --to=aderumier@odiso.com \
    --cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
    --cc=px@jack.fr.eu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Service provided by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH | Privacy | Legal