* [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-esxi-import-tools/storage] improve error handling/logging @ 2024-05-08 12:41 Dominik Csapak 2024-05-08 12:41 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-esxi-import-tools 1/1] improve error handling before mounting Dominik Csapak 2024-05-08 12:41 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH storage 1/1] esxi: improve error handling for fuse mount tool Dominik Csapak 0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Dominik Csapak @ 2024-05-08 12:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: pve-devel two smaller patches that improve which error gets shown to the user and logged to syslog in case of an early error when trying to fuse mount pve-esxi-import-tools: Dominik Csapak (1): improve error handling before mounting src/main.rs | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) pve-storage: Dominik Csapak (1): esxi: improve error handling for fuse mount tool src/PVE/Storage/ESXiPlugin.pm | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) -- 2.39.2 _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-esxi-import-tools 1/1] improve error handling before mounting 2024-05-08 12:41 [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-esxi-import-tools/storage] improve error handling/logging Dominik Csapak @ 2024-05-08 12:41 ` Dominik Csapak 2024-05-08 14:26 ` Thomas Lamprecht 2024-05-08 12:41 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH storage 1/1] esxi: improve error handling for fuse mount tool Dominik Csapak 1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Dominik Csapak @ 2024-05-08 12:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: pve-devel when we fail early in the mount process, we did not log any error to the syslog, but only the top most one to stderr. sadly we were not able to see them anywhere, so improve the log by * log the complete error chain with log::error (so we also can see the causes) * add more context hints in main_do This can help debug issues where we failed early and could not see any error output otherwise, e.g. this thread in the forum: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/146248/ Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com> --- src/main.rs | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/main.rs b/src/main.rs index 281ec3d..a8b2bb6 100644 --- a/src/main.rs +++ b/src/main.rs @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ use std::ffi::{CString, OsStr, OsString}; +use std::fmt::Write; use std::io; use std::os::fd::RawFd; use std::os::unix::ffi::OsStrExt; @@ -221,7 +222,12 @@ fn main() { }); if let Err(err) = runtime.block_on(main_do()) { - eprintln!("Error: {}", err); + let mut err_chain = String::new(); + for err in err.chain() { + let _ = writeln!(err_chain, " {err}"); + } + println!("Error: {err}"); + log::error!("Error: {err_chain}"); std::process::exit(-1); } } @@ -236,15 +242,15 @@ async fn main_do() -> Result<(), Error> { usage(&arg0, std::io::stderr(), 1); } }; - parse_manifest(&args.manifest)?; + parse_manifest(&args.manifest).context("failed to parse manifest")?; let change_uid = match args.change_user.as_deref() { - Some(user) => Some(get_uid(user)?), + Some(user) => Some(get_uid(user).context("failed to get uid")?), None => None, }; let change_gid = match args.change_group.as_deref() { - Some(group) => Some(get_gid(group)?), + Some(group) => Some(get_gid(group).context("failed to get gid")?), None => None, }; @@ -255,10 +261,12 @@ async fn main_do() -> Result<(), Error> { .enable_readdirplus(); for opt in args.mount_options { - fuse = fuse.options_os(&opt)?; + fuse = fuse + .options_os(&opt) + .context("failed to get fuse options")?; } - unmount_if_mounted(&args.mount_path)?; + unmount_if_mounted(&args.mount_path).context("failed to unmount")?; let mut fuse = fuse .build() @@ -302,9 +310,19 @@ async fn main_do() -> Result<(), Error> { let fs_datastore = fs_datacenter.create_datastore(datastore); log::debug!("loading {datacenter:?}/{datastore:?}/{path:?}"); - let config = - vmx::VmConfig::parse(client.open_file(datacenter, datastore, path).await?, path) - .await?; + let config = vmx::VmConfig::parse( + client + .open_file(datacenter, datastore, path) + .await + .with_context(|| { + format!("error opening file for: {datacenter} {datastore} {path}") + })?, + path, + ) + .await + .with_context(|| { + format!("failed to parse vm config for {datacenter} {datastore} {path}") + })?; log::debug!("{config:#?}"); for disk in config.disks.values() { let other_fs_datastore; -- 2.39.2 _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-esxi-import-tools 1/1] improve error handling before mounting 2024-05-08 12:41 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-esxi-import-tools 1/1] improve error handling before mounting Dominik Csapak @ 2024-05-08 14:26 ` Thomas Lamprecht 2024-05-10 13:21 ` Dominik Csapak 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Thomas Lamprecht @ 2024-05-08 14:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Proxmox VE development discussion, Dominik Csapak On 08/05/2024 14:41, Dominik Csapak wrote: > when we fail early in the mount process, we did not log any error to the > syslog, but only the top most one to stderr. > > sadly we were not able to see them anywhere, so improve the log by > * log the complete error chain with log::error (so we also can see the > causes) > * add more context hints in main_do > > This can help debug issues where we failed early and could not see any > error output otherwise, e.g. this thread in the forum: > > https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/146248/ > > Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com> > --- > src/main.rs | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- > 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/main.rs b/src/main.rs > index 281ec3d..a8b2bb6 100644 > --- a/src/main.rs > +++ b/src/main.rs > @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ > use std::ffi::{CString, OsStr, OsString}; > +use std::fmt::Write; > use std::io; > use std::os::fd::RawFd; > use std::os::unix::ffi::OsStrExt; > @@ -221,7 +222,12 @@ fn main() { > }); > > if let Err(err) = runtime.block_on(main_do()) { > - eprintln!("Error: {}", err); > + let mut err_chain = String::new(); > + for err in err.chain() { > + let _ = writeln!(err_chain, " {err}"); is the extra whitespace intended? At least the first line would then have two consecutive whitespaces, one from here and one from the prefix below on log and println. > + } > + println!("Error: {err}"); > + log::error!("Error: {err_chain}"); > std::process::exit(-1); > } > } > @@ -236,15 +242,15 @@ async fn main_do() -> Result<(), Error> { > usage(&arg0, std::io::stderr(), 1); > } > }; > - parse_manifest(&args.manifest)?; > + parse_manifest(&args.manifest).context("failed to parse manifest")?; > > let change_uid = match args.change_user.as_deref() { > - Some(user) => Some(get_uid(user)?), > + Some(user) => Some(get_uid(user).context("failed to get uid")?), > None => None, > }; > > let change_gid = match args.change_group.as_deref() { > - Some(group) => Some(get_gid(group)?), > + Some(group) => Some(get_gid(group).context("failed to get gid")?), > None => None, > }; > > @@ -255,10 +261,12 @@ async fn main_do() -> Result<(), Error> { > .enable_readdirplus(); > > for opt in args.mount_options { > - fuse = fuse.options_os(&opt)?; > + fuse = fuse > + .options_os(&opt) > + .context("failed to get fuse options")?; > } > > - unmount_if_mounted(&args.mount_path)?; > + unmount_if_mounted(&args.mount_path).context("failed to unmount")?; > > let mut fuse = fuse > .build() > @@ -302,9 +310,19 @@ async fn main_do() -> Result<(), Error> { > let fs_datastore = fs_datacenter.create_datastore(datastore); > > log::debug!("loading {datacenter:?}/{datastore:?}/{path:?}"); > - let config = > - vmx::VmConfig::parse(client.open_file(datacenter, datastore, path).await?, path) > - .await?; > + let config = vmx::VmConfig::parse( > + client > + .open_file(datacenter, datastore, path) > + .await > + .with_context(|| { > + format!("error opening file for: {datacenter} {datastore} {path}") should that context be added unconditionally in open_file? Also drop the `for: `, rather something like "error when opening file '{...}'" And FWIW, in above debug log the variable triple is printed as path, and it's also accessible that way on FS level, so might make sense to keep it that way. > + })?, can we move this to a separate `let config =` line before calling parse on is, this gets rather convoluted and with rust one can nicely override the same variable in an explicit way, so this here IMO better expressed that way. > + path, > + ) > + .await > + .with_context(|| { > + format!("failed to parse vm config for {datacenter} {datastore} {path}") > + })?; Similar here, isn't adding that context belonging in the parse fn itself? Might hold true for the static context too, as long as the context does not include call-site specific info, but only fn implementation-site one, they might be better added at the site of implementation to avoid potential repetition. also s/vm/VM/ > log::debug!("{config:#?}"); > for disk in config.disks.values() { > let other_fs_datastore; _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-esxi-import-tools 1/1] improve error handling before mounting 2024-05-08 14:26 ` Thomas Lamprecht @ 2024-05-10 13:21 ` Dominik Csapak 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Dominik Csapak @ 2024-05-10 13:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Thomas Lamprecht, Proxmox VE development discussion On 5/8/24 16:26, Thomas Lamprecht wrote: > On 08/05/2024 14:41, Dominik Csapak wrote: >> when we fail early in the mount process, we did not log any error to the >> syslog, but only the top most one to stderr. >> >> sadly we were not able to see them anywhere, so improve the log by >> * log the complete error chain with log::error (so we also can see the >> causes) >> * add more context hints in main_do >> >> This can help debug issues where we failed early and could not see any >> error output otherwise, e.g. this thread in the forum: >> >> https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/146248/ >> >> Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com> >> --- >> src/main.rs | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- >> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/src/main.rs b/src/main.rs >> index 281ec3d..a8b2bb6 100644 >> --- a/src/main.rs >> +++ b/src/main.rs >> @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ >> use std::ffi::{CString, OsStr, OsString}; >> +use std::fmt::Write; >> use std::io; >> use std::os::fd::RawFd; >> use std::os::unix::ffi::OsStrExt; >> @@ -221,7 +222,12 @@ fn main() { >> }); >> >> if let Err(err) = runtime.block_on(main_do()) { >> - eprintln!("Error: {}", err); >> + let mut err_chain = String::new(); >> + for err in err.chain() { >> + let _ = writeln!(err_chain, " {err}"); > > is the extra whitespace intended? At least the first line would then have two > consecutive whitespaces, one from here and one from the prefix below on log and > println. yes that was intentionally, but the whitespace in log was not i wanted to print something like: Error: <error1> <error2> <error3> etc. we could ofc print them all in one line too... but not a big fan of that for readability > >> + } >> + println!("Error: {err}"); >> + log::error!("Error: {err_chain}"); >> std::process::exit(-1); >> } >> } >> @@ -236,15 +242,15 @@ async fn main_do() -> Result<(), Error> { >> usage(&arg0, std::io::stderr(), 1); >> } >> }; >> - parse_manifest(&args.manifest)?; >> + parse_manifest(&args.manifest).context("failed to parse manifest")?; >> >> let change_uid = match args.change_user.as_deref() { >> - Some(user) => Some(get_uid(user)?), >> + Some(user) => Some(get_uid(user).context("failed to get uid")?), >> None => None, >> }; >> >> let change_gid = match args.change_group.as_deref() { >> - Some(group) => Some(get_gid(group)?), >> + Some(group) => Some(get_gid(group).context("failed to get gid")?), >> None => None, >> }; >> >> @@ -255,10 +261,12 @@ async fn main_do() -> Result<(), Error> { >> .enable_readdirplus(); >> >> for opt in args.mount_options { >> - fuse = fuse.options_os(&opt)?; >> + fuse = fuse >> + .options_os(&opt) >> + .context("failed to get fuse options")?; >> } >> >> - unmount_if_mounted(&args.mount_path)?; >> + unmount_if_mounted(&args.mount_path).context("failed to unmount")?; >> >> let mut fuse = fuse >> .build() >> @@ -302,9 +310,19 @@ async fn main_do() -> Result<(), Error> { >> let fs_datastore = fs_datacenter.create_datastore(datastore); >> >> log::debug!("loading {datacenter:?}/{datastore:?}/{path:?}"); >> - let config = >> - vmx::VmConfig::parse(client.open_file(datacenter, datastore, path).await?, path) >> - .await?; >> + let config = vmx::VmConfig::parse( >> + client >> + .open_file(datacenter, datastore, path) >> + .await >> + .with_context(|| { >> + format!("error opening file for: {datacenter} {datastore} {path}") > > should that context be added unconditionally in open_file? how do you mean? there is only one function in open_file that can fail, so do you mean there? AFAIU with_context/context is only implemented on Result/Option and there is no way to 'add it' to a function for all `foo()?` calls automatically? (or maybe I'm misunderstanding something here?) > > Also drop the `for: `, rather something like "error when opening file '{...}'" > > And FWIW, in above debug log the variable triple is printed as path, > and it's also accessible that way on FS level, so might make sense to > keep it that way. yep, I'll use the same format > >> + })?, > > can we move this to a separate `let config =` line before calling parse on is, > this gets rather convoluted and with rust one can nicely override the same > variable in an explicit way, so this here IMO better expressed that way. sure > >> + path, >> + ) >> + .await >> + .with_context(|| { >> + format!("failed to parse vm config for {datacenter} {datastore} {path}") >> + })?; > > Similar here, isn't adding that context belonging in the parse fn itself? Might > hold true for the static context too, as long as the context does not include > call-site specific info, but only fn implementation-site one, they might be better > added at the site of implementation to avoid potential repetition. here we don't have that path in parse anymore (only the underlying fs path that we probably don't want to log here) > > also s/vm/VM/ > >> log::debug!("{config:#?}"); >> for disk in config.disks.values() { >> let other_fs_datastore; > _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [pve-devel] [PATCH storage 1/1] esxi: improve error handling for fuse mount tool 2024-05-08 12:41 [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-esxi-import-tools/storage] improve error handling/logging Dominik Csapak 2024-05-08 12:41 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-esxi-import-tools 1/1] improve error handling before mounting Dominik Csapak @ 2024-05-08 12:41 ` Dominik Csapak 2024-05-08 14:43 ` Thomas Lamprecht 1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Dominik Csapak @ 2024-05-08 12:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: pve-devel if the fuse tool encounters an error early, it prints it like: Error: some error message on stderr. We can capture that here by redirecting STDERR to $wr and die'ing with the error message. With this we die with the original error message instead of only with the return code which is telling the user nothing and does not help us debug. Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com> --- src/PVE/Storage/ESXiPlugin.pm | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/PVE/Storage/ESXiPlugin.pm b/src/PVE/Storage/ESXiPlugin.pm index b8bce0e..8dc33fc 100644 --- a/src/PVE/Storage/ESXiPlugin.pm +++ b/src/PVE/Storage/ESXiPlugin.pm @@ -222,6 +222,10 @@ sub esxi_mount : prototype($$$;$) { // die "failed to get file descriptor flags: $!\n"; fcntl($wr, F_SETFD, $flags & ~FD_CLOEXEC) // die "failed to remove CLOEXEC flag from fd: $!\n"; + + # capture errors from stderr + open(STDERR, ">&", \*$wr) or die "unable to redirect STDERR: $!\n"; + # FIXME: use the user/group options! exec {$ESXI_FUSE_TOOL} $ESXI_FUSE_TOOL, @@ -245,7 +249,7 @@ sub esxi_mount : prototype($$$;$) { undef $wr; my $result = do { local $/ = undef; <$rd> }; - if ($result =~ /^ERROR: (.*)$/) { + if ($result =~ /^ERROR: (.*)$/i) { die "$1\n"; } -- 2.39.2 _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH storage 1/1] esxi: improve error handling for fuse mount tool 2024-05-08 12:41 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH storage 1/1] esxi: improve error handling for fuse mount tool Dominik Csapak @ 2024-05-08 14:43 ` Thomas Lamprecht 2024-05-10 13:28 ` Dominik Csapak 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Thomas Lamprecht @ 2024-05-08 14:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Proxmox VE development discussion, Dominik Csapak On 08/05/2024 14:41, Dominik Csapak wrote: > if the fuse tool encounters an error early, it prints it like: > Error: some error message > on stderr. > > We can capture that here by redirecting STDERR to $wr and die'ing with using just a variable name like $wr without context in a commit message is hardly telling or useful, maybe replace above and the paragraph below with something like: "Redirect the STDERR of the child process that mounts the ESXi instance to the pipe of the parent (API) process, so that it can pass a hopefully more meaningful message to the user than just an erroneous return code." > the error message. > > With this we die with the original error message instead of only > with the return code which is telling the user nothing and does not > help us debug. > > Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com> > --- > src/PVE/Storage/ESXiPlugin.pm | 6 +++++- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/src/PVE/Storage/ESXiPlugin.pm b/src/PVE/Storage/ESXiPlugin.pm > index b8bce0e..8dc33fc 100644 > --- a/src/PVE/Storage/ESXiPlugin.pm > +++ b/src/PVE/Storage/ESXiPlugin.pm > @@ -222,6 +222,10 @@ sub esxi_mount : prototype($$$;$) { > // die "failed to get file descriptor flags: $!\n"; > fcntl($wr, F_SETFD, $flags & ~FD_CLOEXEC) > // die "failed to remove CLOEXEC flag from fd: $!\n"; > + > + # capture errors from stderr nit: you capture all that gets printed to stderr, not just errors, and no hard feelings, but the comment feels a tiny bit superfluous, at least with the error message. > + open(STDERR, ">&", \*$wr) or die "unable to redirect STDERR: $!\n"; Don't the \ reference operator and the * dereference operator here cancel each other out? > + > # FIXME: use the user/group options! > exec {$ESXI_FUSE_TOOL} > $ESXI_FUSE_TOOL, > @@ -245,7 +249,7 @@ sub esxi_mount : prototype($$$;$) { > undef $wr; > > my $result = do { local $/ = undef; <$rd> }; > - if ($result =~ /^ERROR: (.*)$/) { > + if ($result =~ /^ERROR: (.*)$/i) { > die "$1\n"; > } > _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH storage 1/1] esxi: improve error handling for fuse mount tool 2024-05-08 14:43 ` Thomas Lamprecht @ 2024-05-10 13:28 ` Dominik Csapak 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Dominik Csapak @ 2024-05-10 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Thomas Lamprecht, Proxmox VE development discussion On 5/8/24 16:43, Thomas Lamprecht wrote: > On 08/05/2024 14:41, Dominik Csapak wrote: >> if the fuse tool encounters an error early, it prints it like: >> Error: some error message >> on stderr. >> >> We can capture that here by redirecting STDERR to $wr and die'ing with > > using just a variable name like $wr without context in a commit message > is hardly telling or useful, maybe replace above and the paragraph below > with something like: > > "Redirect the STDERR of the child process that mounts the ESXi instance to > the pipe of the parent (API) process, so that it can pass a hopefully more > meaningful message to the user than just an erroneous return code." > > You're right, that sounds better >> the error message. >> >> With this we die with the original error message instead of only >> with the return code which is telling the user nothing and does not >> help us debug. >> >> Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com> >> --- >> src/PVE/Storage/ESXiPlugin.pm | 6 +++++- >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/src/PVE/Storage/ESXiPlugin.pm b/src/PVE/Storage/ESXiPlugin.pm >> index b8bce0e..8dc33fc 100644 >> --- a/src/PVE/Storage/ESXiPlugin.pm >> +++ b/src/PVE/Storage/ESXiPlugin.pm >> @@ -222,6 +222,10 @@ sub esxi_mount : prototype($$$;$) { >> // die "failed to get file descriptor flags: $!\n"; >> fcntl($wr, F_SETFD, $flags & ~FD_CLOEXEC) >> // die "failed to remove CLOEXEC flag from fd: $!\n"; >> + >> + # capture errors from stderr > > nit: you capture all that gets printed to stderr, not just errors, and no > hard feelings, but the comment feels a tiny bit superfluous, at least with > the error message. true, i'll remove the comment > >> + open(STDERR, ">&", \*$wr) or die "unable to redirect STDERR: $!\n"; > > Don't the \ reference operator and the * dereference operator here cancel > each other out? yes, of course, i'll remove those > >> + >> # FIXME: use the user/group options! >> exec {$ESXI_FUSE_TOOL} >> $ESXI_FUSE_TOOL, >> @@ -245,7 +249,7 @@ sub esxi_mount : prototype($$$;$) { >> undef $wr; >> >> my $result = do { local $/ = undef; <$rd> }; >> - if ($result =~ /^ERROR: (.*)$/) { >> + if ($result =~ /^ERROR: (.*)$/i) { >> die "$1\n"; >> } >> > _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-05-10 13:28 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2024-05-08 12:41 [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-esxi-import-tools/storage] improve error handling/logging Dominik Csapak 2024-05-08 12:41 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-esxi-import-tools 1/1] improve error handling before mounting Dominik Csapak 2024-05-08 14:26 ` Thomas Lamprecht 2024-05-10 13:21 ` Dominik Csapak 2024-05-08 12:41 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH storage 1/1] esxi: improve error handling for fuse mount tool Dominik Csapak 2024-05-08 14:43 ` Thomas Lamprecht 2024-05-10 13:28 ` Dominik Csapak
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox