public inbox for pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
	Aaron Lauterer <a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH docs 2/2] pvecm: add qdevice status flag explanation
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 11:17:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <054cf652-dbfc-4dcb-9650-132990bbe3f1@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230724125431.2492297-2-a.lauterer@proxmox.com>

On 24/07/2023 14:54, Aaron Lauterer wrote:
> They are underdocumented and finding information is not that easy.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Aaron Lauterer <a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
> ---
> 
> Found some info in the suse documentation [0] and the sourcecode [1].

Yes, like it was mentioned on the chat a bit ago, luckily we use open
source which, if not easy for all to find, is at least the definitive
truth – thanks for adding this in our docs now too for our users.

> We do not ship man 3 pages, therefore I used a direct link to the github

corosync-doc does ship that page..

> repo as that seems to be the only place that talks abit about the MW /
> NMW flag.
> 
> [0] https://documentation.suse.com/sle-ha/15-SP1/html/SLE-HA-all/cha-ha-qdevice.html
> [1] https://github.com/corosync/corosync/blob/v3.1.7/tools/corosync-quorumtool.c#L524-L536
> 
> 
>  pvecm.adoc | 15 +++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/pvecm.adoc b/pvecm.adoc
> index 45271e8..e286bdd 100644
> --- a/pvecm.adoc
> +++ b/pvecm.adoc
> @@ -1082,6 +1082,21 @@ Membership information
>  
>  ----
>  

I'd proactively add a reference here, e.g.:

[[pvecm_qdevice_status_flags]]

> +QDevice Status Flags
> +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> +
> +The status output of the QDevice, as seen above, will usually contain three
> +columns:
> +
> +* `A` / `NA`: Alive or Not Alive. Indicates if the communication to the external
> +    `corosync-qndetd` daemon works.
> +* `V` / `NV`: If the QDevice will cast a vote for the node. In a split-brain
> +    situation, where the corosync connection between the nodes is down, but they
> +    both can still communicate with the external `corosync-qnetd` daemon,
> +    only one node will get the vote.
> +* `MW` / `NMW`: Master wins (`MV`) or not (`NMW`). Default is `NMW`, see footnote:[`votequorum_qdevice_master_wins` manual page https://github.com/corosync/corosync/blob/main/man/votequorum_qdevice_master_wins.3.in].

I really would not link to the manpage source directly on GitHub.
I'd either use manpages.debian.org [0] or none at all and refer to the
corosync-doc package, which ships it.

[0]: https://manpages.debian.org/bookworm/libvotequorum-dev/votequorum_qdevice_master_wins.3.en.html

> +* `NR`: QDevice is not registered.
> +
>  
>  Frequently Asked Questions
>  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~





  reply	other threads:[~2023-07-25  9:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-24 12:54 [pve-devel] [PATCH docs 1/2] pvecm: fix pvecm status indentation Aaron Lauterer
2023-07-24 12:54 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH docs 2/2] pvecm: add qdevice status flag explanation Aaron Lauterer
2023-07-25  9:17   ` Thomas Lamprecht [this message]
2023-07-25  9:35     ` Aaron Lauterer
2023-07-25  9:56 ` [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH docs 1/2] pvecm: fix pvecm status indentation Thomas Lamprecht

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=054cf652-dbfc-4dcb-9650-132990bbe3f1@proxmox.com \
    --to=t.lamprecht@proxmox.com \
    --cc=a.lauterer@proxmox.com \
    --cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Service provided by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH | Privacy | Legal