From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH widget-toolkit] fix external linking to products by setting cookie SameSite attribute to lax
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 15:30:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <03cf9487-37a8-4f87-8dee-1ea63d86ffbb@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241007150251.3295598-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Am 07/10/2024 um 17:02 schrieb Dominik Csapak:
> We introduced the 'strict' setting when browsers warned about our
> cookies not having any SameSite setting [0]
>
> While this works in general, it had an unforeseen side effect:
>
> When linking to a URL of our products, the cookie does not get sent on
> the initial page load, leading to the username/CSRFPreventionToken not
> being set in the index response.
>
> Our UI code interprets this as being logged out (e.g. because the ticket
> is not valid) and clears the cookie, displaying the login window.
>
> The MDN reference[1] says that setting it to 'lax' is similar to
> 'strict', but sends the cookie when navigating *to* our origin even from
> other sites, which is what we want when linking from elsewhere. (This
> would have also been the default if we wouldn't have set any attribute).
>
> 0: https://lore.proxmox.com/pve-devel/20230315162630.289768-1-m.carrara@proxmox.com/
> 1: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Cookies#SameSite_attribute
>
> Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
> ---
> Alternatively, we could try to modify the client code to retry with the
> content of the cookie (which the client still has), to generate a
> ticket. Though I'm not sure that will work correctly, since I observed
> some even stricter behaviour in Firefox ESR, where not only the
> navigation part did not send the cookie, but also subsequent requests
> did not do that (I did not test for long, so this may have been an
> artifact of a different issue).
>
> I'd generally prefer this solution, since it's less intrusive and
> restores the behaviour we had before the change, altough I'm not against
> implementing a retry in the client code if that's preferred.
>
> src/Utils.js | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
>
applied, with slight rewording of the commit message (I initially interpreted
"URL of our products" as a URL to a www.proxmox.com product page, which confused
me for a bit), thanks!
_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-15 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-07 15:02 [pve-devel] " Dominik Csapak
2024-10-08 12:10 ` Max Carrara
2024-10-14 11:57 ` Dominik Csapak
2024-10-14 12:03 ` Dominik Csapak
2024-10-15 13:30 ` Thomas Lamprecht [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=03cf9487-37a8-4f87-8dee-1ea63d86ffbb@proxmox.com \
--to=t.lamprecht@proxmox.com \
--cc=d.csapak@proxmox.com \
--cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox