From: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
To: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>, pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Subject: Re: [pmg-devel] [PATCH pmg-api v2] fix #3734: scrub 'url' from style tags/attributes
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 08:51:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3627c843-b11c-7a8e-1235-9d203558df06@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <850e6a4c-b370-614e-6b2a-819a06d9fbb8@proxmox.com>
On 11/25/21 18:26, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
> On 25.11.21 15:14, Dominik Csapak wrote:
>> if 'view images' for the quarantine is disabled, it is expected that
>> *no* images will be loaded. but in addition to img (src/href/etc.)
>> also css can load external images via the 'url' directive
>>
>> since html scrubber does not parse/iterate over css, we simply remove
>> the url+protocol part of those tags/attributes. this technically
leaves behind
>> invalid css, but the browsers should cope with that.
>> (we cannot 'cleanly' remove without much more effort because of quoting)
>>
>> also we have to scrub the style tags in 'dump_html' since HTML::Scrubber
>> does not have a way to modify the *content* of a tag, only the
>> attributes...
>>
>
> I found two issues (see inline), I got fully commited followups here,
but I did
> not push that yet so we can quick check tomorrow if its ok for you
and that I
> missed nothing else.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
>> ---
>> changes from v1:
>> * replace url with ___ and protocol:// with _ instead of removing
>> * move sub out and use the reference
>> * always pass $cid_hash and only use it in the function when
>> $view_images is set
>> * improve comment to show what 'dump_html' does
>>
>> @thomas: a note to our off-list discussion regarding url-encoding the
>> protocol: you *could* do it, but the browser does not recognize it as
>> a protocol and interprets it as a relative url, so we're safe on
>> this regard
>
> thx for checking!
>
>>
>> src/PMG/HTMLMail.pm | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/PMG/HTMLMail.pm b/src/PMG/HTMLMail.pm
>> index b69a596..c5c94bf 100644
>> --- a/src/PMG/HTMLMail.pm
>> +++ b/src/PMG/HTMLMail.pm
>> @@ -15,8 +15,26 @@ use HTML::Scrubber;
>> use PMG::Utils;
>> use PMG::MIMEUtils;
>>
>> +# $value is a ref to a string scalar
>> +my sub remove_urls {
>> + my ($value) = @_;
>
> $$value can be undef here, so I added a
> return if !defined $$value;
>
> to avoid a ugly warning like:
>
> pmgproxy[164923]: Use of uninitialized value in substitution (s///)
at /usr/share/perl5/PMG/HTMLMail.pm line 22.
> pmgproxy[164923]: Use of uninitialized value in substitution (s///)
at /usr/share/perl5/PMG/HTMLMail.pm line 25.
>
> every time one loads a mail where this happens.
make sense
>
>> -- 8< snip 8< --
>
>> @@ -137,7 +159,7 @@ sub getscrubber {
>> span => 1,
>> src => $viewimages ? qr{^(?!(?:java)?script)}i : 0,
>> start => 1,
>> - style => 1,
>> + style => $viewimages ? 1 : \remove_urls_from_attr,
>
> this actually does not works as expected, to get the callback
functionality we need
> to set it at the "rules" one, not here at the "default" one, which
really just is the
> boolean default for that attribute type, and setting it to an code
ref-makes may call
> it once but due to returning undef it just plainly disables the tag,
which is way more
> scrubbing than we want to achieve.
>
ok so you're right in that it does not work correctly here
(idk why i did not catch that), but we can use a sub here
the 'default' contains the 'default' rules, else the regexes would
also not work
what prevents it from working here that it does not like the
reference to the function, so making it a
my $remove_urls_from_attr = sub {}; and giving '$remove_urls_from_attr'
here works as expected. (i'll send a v3)
On 11/26/21 08:28, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
> On 25.11.21 15:14, Dominik Csapak wrote:
>> if 'view images' for the quarantine is disabled, it is expected that
>> *no* images will be loaded. but in addition to img (src/href/etc.)
>> also css can load external images via the 'url' directive
>>
>> since html scrubber does not parse/iterate over css, we simply remove
>> the url+protocol part of those tags/attributes. this technically leaves behind
>> invalid css, but the browsers should cope with that.
>> (we cannot 'cleanly' remove without much more effort because of quoting)
>>
>> also we have to scrub the style tags in 'dump_html' since HTML::Scrubber
>> does not have a way to modify the *content* of a tag, only the
>> attributes...
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
>> ---
>> changes from v1:
>> * replace url with ___ and protocol:// with _ instead of removing
>> * move sub out and use the reference
>> * always pass $cid_hash and only use it in the function when
>> $view_images is set
>> * improve comment to show what 'dump_html' does
>>
>> @thomas: a note to our off-list discussion regarding url-encoding the
>> protocol: you *could* do it, but the browser does not recognize it as
>> a protocol and interprets it as a relative url, so we're safe on
>> this regard
>>
>
> Another option: Setting the content security policy:
>
> For this call we could use:
> $resp->header("Content-Security-Policy", "default-src 'self'; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline';");
>
> Maybe even;
> "Content-Security-Policy", "default-src 'none'; style-src 'unsafe-inline';"
>
> That works out quite well here.
>
> In the long run the CSP is something we could evaluate in general, at least for API
> calls, as only (mostly?) those contain dynamic, sometimes user/foreign controlled input.
>
> If we would like to set a CSP for everything we'd need something like:
>
> $resp->header("Content-Security-Policy", "default-src 'self'; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval'; img-src 'self' data:;");
>
> to cover it, and ideally switch from 'unsafe-inline' to nonce/sha approach of
> whitelisting, but in any case, nothing that we'd want to rush out now.
>
> Also, doing both is an option, avoiding requests in the first place, so no scary
> errors in the browser console, and the CSP, for really just this the *quarantine/content
> API call, as safety net..
>
yes imho setting the csp is also good, but requires patching http-server
too so that we can set the header there..
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-26 7:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-25 14:14 Dominik Csapak
2021-11-25 17:26 ` Thomas Lamprecht
2021-11-26 7:28 ` Thomas Lamprecht
2021-11-26 7:51 ` Dominik Csapak [this message]
2021-11-26 9:07 ` [pmg-devel] applied: " Thomas Lamprecht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3627c843-b11c-7a8e-1235-9d203558df06@proxmox.com \
--to=d.csapak@proxmox.com \
--cc=pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
--cc=t.lamprecht@proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox