From: Wolfgang Bumiller <w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
To: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Cc: pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com, f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com
Subject: Re: [pmg-devel] [PATCH api 2/8] add PMG::CertHelpers module
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 14:55:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210312135516.jxmbeuerjry6252v@wobu-vie.proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d10977b8-407b-cb71-cd52-ae71e1306968@proxmox.com>
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 11:05:21AM +0100, Dominik Csapak wrote:
> comments inline
>
> On 3/9/21 3:13 PM, Wolfgang Bumiller wrote:
> > Contains helpers to update certificates and provide locking
> > for certificates and when accessing acme accounts.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Bumiller <w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
> > ---
> > src/Makefile | 1 +
> > src/PMG/CertHelpers.pm | 180 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 181 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 src/PMG/CertHelpers.pm
> >
> > diff --git a/src/Makefile b/src/Makefile
> > index 8891a3c..c1d4812 100644
> > --- a/src/Makefile
> > +++ b/src/Makefile
> > @@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ LIBSOURCES = \
> > PMG/HTMLMail.pm \
> > PMG/ModGroup.pm \
> > PMG/SMTPPrinter.pm \
> > + PMG/CertHelpers.pm \
> > PMG/Config.pm \
> > PMG/Cluster.pm \
> > PMG/ClusterConfig.pm \
> > diff --git a/src/PMG/CertHelpers.pm b/src/PMG/CertHelpers.pm
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..2cf8a4e
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/src/PMG/CertHelpers.pm
> > @@ -0,0 +1,180 @@
> > +package PMG::CertHelpers;
> > +
> > +use strict;
> > +use warnings;
> > +
> > +use PVE::Certificate;
> > +use PVE::JSONSchema;
> > +use PVE::Tools;
> > +
> > +use constant {
> > + API_CERT => '/etc/pmg/pmg-api.pem',
> > + SMTP_CERT => '/etc/pmg/pmg-tls.pem',
> > +};
> > +
> > +my $account_prefix = '/etc/pmg/acme';
> > +
> > +# TODO: Move `pve-acme-account-name` to common and reuse instead of this.
> > +PVE::JSONSchema::register_standard_option('pmg-acme-account-name', {
> > + description => 'ACME account config file name.',
> > + type => 'string',
> > + format => 'pve-configid',
> > + format_description => 'name',
> > + optional => 1,
> > + default => 'default',
> > +});
> > +
> > +PVE::JSONSchema::register_standard_option('pmg-acme-account-contact', {
> > + type => 'string',
> > + format => 'email-list',
> > + description => 'Contact email addresses.',
> > +});
> > +
> > +PVE::JSONSchema::register_standard_option('pmg-acme-directory-url', {
> > + type => 'string',
> > + description => 'URL of ACME CA directory endpoint.',
> > + pattern => '^https?://.*',
> > +});
> > +
> > +PVE::JSONSchema::register_format('pmg-certificate-type', sub {
> > + my ($type, $noerr) = @_;
> > +
> > + if ($type =~ /^(?: api | smtp )$/x) {
> > + return $type;
> > + }
> > + return undef if $noerr;
> > + die "value '$type' does not look like a valid certificate type\n";
> > +});
> > +
> > +PVE::JSONSchema::register_standard_option('pmg-certificate-type', {
> > + type => 'string',
> > + description => 'The TLS certificate type (API or SMTP certificate).',
> > + enum => ['api', 'smtp'],
> > +});
>
> i get why you did the format and the option (you need it once as a '-list')
> but would it not have been possible to reuse the format instead
> of redefining the enum?
Yeah I suppose that works
> or only using the enum as variable defined somewhere?
(or at least that will)
> feels weird to have a format + option that do basically
> the same thing
I know
>
> > +
> > +PVE::JSONSchema::register_format('pmg-acme-domain', sub {
> > + my ($domain, $noerr) = @_;
> > +
> > + my $label = qr/[a-z0-9][a-z0-9_-]*/i;
> > +
> > + return $domain if $domain =~ /^$label(?:\.$label)+$/;
> > + return undef if $noerr;
> > + die "value '$domain' does not look like a valid domain name!\n";
> > +});
> > +
> > +PVE::JSONSchema::register_format('pmg-acme-alias', sub {
> > + my ($alias, $noerr) = @_;
> > +
> > + my $label = qr/[a-z0-9_][a-z0-9_-]*/i;
> > +
> > + return $alias if $alias =~ /^$label(?:\.$label)+$/;
> > + return undef if $noerr;
> > + die "value '$alias' does not look like a valid alias name!\n";
> > +});
>
> could we not reuse the '-domain' format here ?
> i know the error message would be different then, but it is still a domain?
>
> if not, we could refactor the regexes though
-alias was specifically introduced to allow using underscore prefixes.
(See pve-manager b3d421707)
>
> > +
> > +my $local_cert_lock = '/var/lock/pmg-certs.lock';
> > +my $local_acme_lock = '/var/lock/pmg-acme.lock';
> > +
> > +sub cert_path : prototype($) {
> > + my ($type) = @_;
> > + if ($type eq 'api') {
> > + return API_CERT;
> > + } elsif ($type eq 'smtp') {
> > + return SMTP_CERT;
> > + } else {
> > + die "unknown certificate type '$type'\n";
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +sub cert_lock {
> > + my ($timeout, $code, @param) = @_;
> > +
> > + my $res = PVE::Tools::lock_file($local_cert_lock, $timeout, $code, @param);
> > + die $@ if $@;
> > + return $res;
> > +}
> > +
> > +sub set_cert_file {
> > + my ($cert, $cert_path, $force) = @_;
> > +
> > + my ($old_cert, $info);
> > +
> > + my $cert_path_old = "${cert_path}.old";
> > +
> > + die "Custom certificate file exists but force flag is not set.\n"
> > + if !$force && -e $cert_path;
> > +
> > + PVE::Tools::file_copy($cert_path, $cert_path_old) if -e $cert_path;
> > +
> > + eval {
> > + my $gid = undef;
> > + if ($cert_path eq &API_CERT) {
> > + $gid = getgrnam('www-data') ||
> > + die "user www-data not in group file\n";
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (defined($gid)) {
> > + my $cert_path_tmp = "${cert_path}.tmp";
> > + PVE::Tools::file_set_contents($cert_path_tmp, $cert, 0640);
> > + if (!chown(-1, $gid, $cert_path_tmp)) {
> > + my $msg =
> > + "failed to change group ownership of '$cert_path_tmp' to www-data ($gid): $!\n";
> > + unlink($cert_path_tmp);
> > + die $msg;
> > + }
> > + if (!rename($cert_path_tmp, $cert_path)) {
> > + my $msg =
> > + "failed to rename '$cert_path_tmp' to '$cert_path': $!\n";
> > + unlink($cert_path_tmp);
> > + die $msg;
> > + }
> > + } else {
> > + PVE::Tools::file_set_contents($cert_path, $cert, 0600);
> > + }
> > +
> > + $info = PVE::Certificate::get_certificate_info($cert_path);
> > + };
> > + my $err = $@;
> > +
> > + if ($err) {
> > + if (-e $cert_path_old) {
> > + eval {
> > + warn "Attempting to restore old certificate file..\n";
> > + PVE::Tools::file_copy($cert_path_old, $cert_path);
> > + };
> > + warn "$@\n" if $@;
> > + }
> > + die "Setting certificate files failed - $err\n"
> > + }
> > +
> > + unlink $cert_path_old;
> > +
> > + return $info;
> > +}
> > +
> > +sub lock_acme {
> > + my ($account_name, $timeout, $code, @param) = @_;
> > +
> > + my $file = "$local_acme_lock.$account_name";
> > +
> > + return PVE::Tools::lock_file($file, $timeout, $code, @param);
> > +}
> > +
>
> is there a special reason why you die $@ if $@ above in cert_lock
> but not here?
>
> afaics, you do it manually in the later patches always anyway
That's just lock api madness... will fix.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-12 13:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-09 14:13 [pmg-devel] [RFC api/gui/wtk/acme 0/many] Certificates & ACME Wolfgang Bumiller
2021-03-09 14:13 ` [pmg-devel] [PATCH api 1/8] depend on libpmg-rs-perl and proxmox-acme Wolfgang Bumiller
2021-03-09 14:13 ` [pmg-devel] [PATCH api 2/8] add PMG::CertHelpers module Wolfgang Bumiller
2021-03-11 10:05 ` Dominik Csapak
2021-03-12 13:55 ` Wolfgang Bumiller [this message]
2021-03-09 14:13 ` [pmg-devel] [PATCH api 3/8] add PMG::NodeConfig module Wolfgang Bumiller
2021-03-09 14:13 ` [pmg-devel] [PATCH api 4/8] cluster: sync acme/ and acme-plugins.conf Wolfgang Bumiller
2021-03-09 14:13 ` [pmg-devel] [PATCH api 5/8] api: add ACME and ACMEPlugin module Wolfgang Bumiller
2021-03-11 10:41 ` Dominik Csapak
2021-03-12 14:10 ` Wolfgang Bumiller
2021-03-09 14:13 ` [pmg-devel] [PATCH api 6/8] add certificates api endpoint Wolfgang Bumiller
2021-03-11 11:06 ` Dominik Csapak
2021-03-12 14:51 ` Wolfgang Bumiller
2021-03-09 14:13 ` [pmg-devel] [PATCH api 7/8] add node-config api entry points Wolfgang Bumiller
2021-03-09 14:13 ` [pmg-devel] [PATCH api 8/8] add acme and cert subcommands to pmgconfig Wolfgang Bumiller
2021-03-09 14:13 ` [pmg-devel] [PATCH gui] add certificates and acme view Wolfgang Bumiller
2021-03-11 12:35 ` Dominik Csapak
2021-03-09 14:13 ` [pmg-devel] [PATCH acme] add missing 'use PVE::Acme' statement Wolfgang Bumiller
2021-03-12 15:00 ` [pmg-devel] applied: " Thomas Lamprecht
2021-03-09 14:13 ` [pmg-devel] [PATCH widget-toolkit 1/7] Utils: add ACME related utilities Wolfgang Bumiller
2021-03-09 14:13 ` [pmg-devel] [PATCH widget-toolkit 2/7] add ACME related data models Wolfgang Bumiller
2021-03-11 12:41 ` Dominik Csapak
2021-03-09 14:13 ` [pmg-devel] [PATCH widget-toolkit 3/7] add ACME forms: Wolfgang Bumiller
2021-03-09 14:13 ` [pmg-devel] [PATCH widget-toolkit 4/7] add certificate panel Wolfgang Bumiller
2021-03-09 14:13 ` [pmg-devel] [PATCH widget-toolkit 5/7] add ACME account panel Wolfgang Bumiller
2021-03-11 13:51 ` Dominik Csapak
2021-03-11 15:14 ` Thomas Lamprecht
2021-03-11 15:16 ` Dominik Csapak
2021-03-11 15:27 ` Thomas Lamprecht
2021-03-09 14:14 ` [pmg-devel] [PATCH widget-toolkit 6/7] add ACME plugin editing Wolfgang Bumiller
2021-03-09 14:14 ` [pmg-devel] [PATCH widget-toolkit 7/7] add ACME domain editing Wolfgang Bumiller
2021-03-10 12:27 ` [pmg-devel] [RFC api/gui/wtk/acme 0/many] Certificates & ACME Dominik Csapak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210312135516.jxmbeuerjry6252v@wobu-vie.proxmox.com \
--to=w.bumiller@proxmox.com \
--cc=d.csapak@proxmox.com \
--cc=f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com \
--cc=pmg-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox