From: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
To: Wolfgang Bumiller <w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
Cc: Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion
<pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [pdm-devel] Howto access raw response data with pdm-client
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2025 10:50:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bf85250e-7089-43b1-8a47-0c2842485612@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ppm6czodwzc5afnyb3h5sktrchhdqjrspdwcjqstrlgdhajxry@rrloui47v2xh>
On 10/16/25 10:27 AM, Wolfgang Bumiller wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2025 at 10:10:58AM +0200, Dominik Csapak wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/15/25 6:06 PM, Dietmar Maurer wrote:
>>> We currently use proxmox-yew-comp::ApiLoadCallback for many widgets.
>>>
>>> This callback returns Result<ApiResponseData<T>, Error>, and
>>> we use it most times with Result<ApiResponseData<Value>, Error> to access
>>> raw response data.
>>>
>>> Is there a way to get that data using pdm-client?
>
> I'm a bit confused as to what "that data" is referring to. The client
> does give you the above types, and they come from the intermediate
> `HttpApiResponse` which has all-public fields including the `body:
> Vec<u8>` if for some reason the `ApiResponseData` is not enough, but why
> wouldn't it?
ApiResponseData would be enough, but the client (at least the api calls
we implemented at the moment) does not return that but rather the inner
type, for example:
---
pub async fn get_metric_collection_status(
&self,
) -> Result<Vec<pdm_api_types::MetricCollectionStatus>, Error> {
let path: &str = "/api2/extjs/metric-collection/status";
Ok(self.0.get(path_and_query: path).await?.expect_json()?.data)
}
---
which is the pattern i see for (nearly?) all methods of the PdmClient
>
>>>
>>
>> after talking a bit off-list with dietmar, one solution to the problem
>> could be to not use the statically typed methods but instead provide a
>> method to generate the url and we use that + e.g. http_post/get/etc. to
>> make api calls (which can convert the parameter with Serialize and the
>> return type with Deserialize)
>>
>> with that we can also use `Value` if needed and can extract the auxiliary
>> data from the api call too?
>
> Which auxiliary data ends up neither in `data` nor in `attribs`, and
> more importantly: why? Sounds like something is circumventing the
> response format we normally get from the formatter?
> (And then we could just extend `ApiResponseData` to optionally include
> it, or better yet, fix the API call?)
see above, the question is basically:
should we return ApiResponseData everywhere, or should we decide case by
case, or ...
_______________________________________________
pdm-devel mailing list
pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pdm-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-16 8:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-15 16:06 Dietmar Maurer
2025-10-16 8:10 ` Dominik Csapak
2025-10-16 8:27 ` Wolfgang Bumiller
2025-10-16 8:50 ` Dominik Csapak [this message]
2025-10-16 9:03 ` Wolfgang Bumiller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bf85250e-7089-43b1-8a47-0c2842485612@proxmox.com \
--to=d.csapak@proxmox.com \
--cc=pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
--cc=w.bumiller@proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox