From: "Michael Köppl" <m.koeppl@proxmox.com>
To: "Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion"
<pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Cc: "pdm-devel" <pdm-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [pdm-devel] [PATCH datacenter-manager v3 08/11] api: subscription status: add support for view parameter
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2025 15:46:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DE5Y3M3BHDR0.87KEX7JVF4D2@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251106134353.263598-9-l.wagner@proxmox.com>
1 comment inline
On Thu Nov 6, 2025 at 2:43 PM CET, Lukas Wagner wrote:
> A view allows one to get filtered subset of all resources, based on
> filter rules defined in a config file. Views integrate with the
> permission system - if a user has permissions on /view/{view-id}, then
> these privileges are transitively applied to all resources which are
> matched by the rules. All other permission checks are replaced if
> requesting data through a view.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Wagner <l.wagner@proxmox.com>
> ---
>
> Notes:
> Changes since v2:
> - make sure to not filter out a remote if it has been explicitly
> included
>
> server/src/api/resources.rs | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/server/src/api/resources.rs b/server/src/api/resources.rs
> index 143335fe..2930da8b 100644
> --- a/server/src/api/resources.rs
> +++ b/server/src/api/resources.rs
> @@ -552,6 +552,10 @@ pub async fn get_status(
> default: false,
> description: "If true, includes subscription information per node (with enough privileges)",
> },
> + view: {
> + schema: VIEW_ID_SCHEMA,
> + optional: true,
> + },
> },
> },
> returns: {
> @@ -566,6 +570,7 @@ pub async fn get_status(
> pub async fn get_subscription_status(
> max_age: u64,
> verbose: bool,
> + view: Option<String>,
> rpcenv: &mut dyn RpcEnvironment,
> ) -> Result<Vec<RemoteSubscriptions>, Error> {
> let (remotes_config, _) = pdm_config::remotes::config()?;
> @@ -574,9 +579,17 @@ pub async fn get_subscription_status(
>
> let auth_id = rpcenv.get_auth_id().unwrap().parse()?;
> let user_info = CachedUserInfo::new()?;
> - let allow_all = user_info
> - .check_privs(&auth_id, &["resource"], PRIV_RESOURCE_AUDIT, false)
> - .is_ok();
> +
> + let allow_all = if let Some(view) = &view {
> + user_info.check_privs(&auth_id, &["view", view], PRIV_RESOURCE_AUDIT, false)?;
> + false
> + } else {
> + user_info
> + .check_privs(&auth_id, &["resource"], PRIV_RESOURCE_AUDIT, false)
> + .is_ok()
> + };
> +
> + let view = views::get_optional_view(view.as_deref())?;
>
> let check_priv = |remote_name: &str| -> bool {
> user_info
> @@ -590,35 +603,64 @@ pub async fn get_subscription_status(
> };
>
> for (remote_name, remote) in remotes_config {
> - if !allow_all && !check_priv(&remote_name) {
> + if let Some(view) = &view {
> + if view.can_skip_remote(&remote_name) {
> + continue;
> + }
> + } else if !allow_all && !check_priv(&remote_name) {
> continue;
> }
>
> + let view = view.clone();
> +
> let future = async move {
> let (node_status, error) =
> match get_subscription_info_for_remote(&remote, max_age).await {
> - Ok(node_status) => (Some(node_status), None),
> + Ok(mut node_status) => {
> + node_status.retain(|node, _| {
> + if let Some(view) = &view {
> + view.is_node_included(&remote.id, node)
> + } else {
> + true
> + }
> + });
> + (Some(node_status), None)
> + }
> Err(error) => (None, Some(error.to_string())),
> };
>
> - let mut state = RemoteSubscriptionState::Unknown;
> + let state = if let Some(node_status) = &node_status {
> + if let Some(view) = view {
> + if error.is_some() && !view.is_remote_explicitly_included(&remote.id) {
Can this ever be be true? From the code above, you can never have the
case that node_status and error are both Some(...) at the same time, so
error.is_some() would always evaluate to false here, unless I'm missing
something.
I think you'd have to put the check outside of this block.
if let Some(view) = &view {
if error.is_some() && !view.is_remote_explicitly_included(&remote.id) {
return None;
}
}
let state = if let Some(node_status) = &node_status {
...
}
> + // Don't leak the existence of failed remotes unless they were explicitly
> + // pulled in by a `include remote:<id>` rule.
> + return None;
> + }
> + }
>
> - if let Some(node_status) = &node_status {
> - state = map_node_subscription_list_to_state(node_status);
> - }
> + if node_status.is_empty() {
> + return None;
> + }
>
> - RemoteSubscriptions {
> + map_node_subscription_list_to_state(node_status)
> + } else {
> + RemoteSubscriptionState::Unknown
> + };
> +
> + Some(RemoteSubscriptions {
> remote: remote_name,
> error,
> state,
> node_status: if verbose { node_status } else { None },
> - }
> + })
> };
>
> futures.push(future);
> }
>
> - Ok(join_all(futures).await)
> + let status = join_all(futures).await.into_iter().flatten().collect();
> +
> + Ok(status)
> }
>
> // FIXME: make timeframe and count parameters?
_______________________________________________
pdm-devel mailing list
pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pdm-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-11 14:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-06 13:43 [pdm-devel] [PATCH datacenter-manager v3 00/11] backend implementation for view filters Lukas Wagner
2025-11-06 13:43 ` [pdm-devel] [PATCH datacenter-manager v3 01/11] pdm-api-types: views: add ViewConfig type Lukas Wagner
2025-11-11 10:57 ` Michael Köppl
2025-11-12 10:04 ` Lukas Wagner
2025-11-11 10:58 ` Michael Köppl
2025-11-12 10:05 ` Lukas Wagner
2025-11-06 13:43 ` [pdm-devel] [PATCH datacenter-manager v3 02/11] pdm-config: views: add support for views Lukas Wagner
2025-11-06 13:43 ` [pdm-devel] [PATCH datacenter-manager v3 03/11] acl: add '/view' and '/view/{view-id}' as allowed ACL paths Lukas Wagner
2025-11-06 13:43 ` [pdm-devel] [PATCH datacenter-manager v3 04/11] views: add implementation for view resource filtering Lukas Wagner
2025-11-06 13:43 ` [pdm-devel] [PATCH datacenter-manager v3 05/11] api: resources: list: add support for view parameter Lukas Wagner
2025-11-11 14:31 ` Michael Köppl
2025-11-12 10:14 ` Lukas Wagner
2025-11-06 13:43 ` [pdm-devel] [PATCH datacenter-manager v3 06/11] api: resources: top entities: " Lukas Wagner
2025-11-06 13:43 ` [pdm-devel] [PATCH datacenter-manager v3 07/11] api: resources: status: " Lukas Wagner
2025-11-06 13:43 ` [pdm-devel] [PATCH datacenter-manager v3 08/11] api: subscription " Lukas Wagner
2025-11-11 14:46 ` Michael Köppl [this message]
2025-11-12 8:19 ` Shannon Sterz
2025-11-12 10:26 ` Lukas Wagner
2025-11-06 13:43 ` [pdm-devel] [PATCH datacenter-manager v3 09/11] api: remote-tasks: " Lukas Wagner
2025-11-06 13:43 ` [pdm-devel] [PATCH datacenter-manager v3 10/11] pdm-client: resource list: add view-filter parameter Lukas Wagner
2025-11-06 13:43 ` [pdm-devel] [PATCH datacenter-manager v3 11/11] pdm-client: top entities: " Lukas Wagner
2025-11-11 15:00 ` [pdm-devel] [PATCH datacenter-manager v3 00/11] backend implementation for view filters Michael Köppl
2025-11-12 10:37 ` [pdm-devel] superseded: " Lukas Wagner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DE5Y3M3BHDR0.87KEX7JVF4D2@proxmox.com \
--to=m.koeppl@proxmox.com \
--cc=pdm-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com \
--cc=pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox