From: "Lukas Wagner" <l.wagner@proxmox.com>
To: "Shannon Sterz" <s.sterz@proxmox.com>,
"Lukas Wagner" <l.wagner@proxmox.com>
Cc: Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion
<pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [pdm-devel] [PATCH proxmox-datacenter-manager 02/12] pdm-api-types: add types for remote upgrade summary
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2025 13:12:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DDKJW2Q3BE98.2E4NNH50KI19G@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DDKIORR999BY.1FD26RJT0RAOB@proxmox.com>
On Fri Oct 17, 2025 at 12:15 PM CEST, Shannon Sterz wrote:
> On Wed Oct 15, 2025 at 2:47 PM CEST, Lukas Wagner wrote:
>> This type contains the number of available updates per remote node,
>> without any details. This is useful for a global "give me the update
>> availability for all managed nodes" API endpoint.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lukas Wagner <l.wagner@proxmox.com>
>> ---
>> lib/pdm-api-types/src/lib.rs | 2 +
>> lib/pdm-api-types/src/remote_updates.rs | 126 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 128 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 lib/pdm-api-types/src/remote_updates.rs
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/pdm-api-types/src/lib.rs b/lib/pdm-api-types/src/lib.rs
>> index a3566142..2fb61ef7 100644
>> --- a/lib/pdm-api-types/src/lib.rs
>> +++ b/lib/pdm-api-types/src/lib.rs
>> @@ -96,6 +96,8 @@ pub use openid::*;
>>
>> pub mod remotes;
>>
>> +pub mod remote_updates;
>> +
>> pub mod resource;
>>
>> pub mod rrddata;
>> diff --git a/lib/pdm-api-types/src/remote_updates.rs b/lib/pdm-api-types/src/remote_updates.rs
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 00000000..d04a7a79
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/lib/pdm-api-types/src/remote_updates.rs
>> @@ -0,0 +1,126 @@
>> +use std::{
>> + collections::HashMap,
>> + ops::{Deref, DerefMut},
>> +};
>> +
>
> nit: i think we prefer module level imports these days. so this should
> be
>
> use std::collections::HashMap;
> use std::ops::{Deref, DerefMut};
>
> but no hard feelings from my side and certainly not a blocker
>
Right, thanks for the hint! Although I have to say that I'm not a fan of
enforcing this 'rule' or 'guideline' as long as we cannot teach rustfmt
to 'do the right thing'. 99% of my 'use' statements are produced by
rust-analyzer and I'm not a fan of having to micro-manage these, if I'm
perfectly honest.
>> +use proxmox_schema::{api, ApiType, ObjectSchema};
>> +use serde::{Deserialize, Serialize};
>> +
>
> nit: ordering of use statements should be std -> generic crates (serde,
> anyhow etc.) -> proxmox* -> project; each separate by an empty line, to
> my knowledge.
>
> so:
>
> ```
> use serde::{Deserialize, Serialize};
>
> use proxmox_schema::{api, ApiType, ObjectSchema};
> ```
>
> again not a
> blocker, just saw it and thought id mention it
Thanks for the reminder! Usually I check for this nowadays, but
sometimes I forget to. I wonder if we could create custom linter
script/tool checking for these - maybe using the treesitter library.
>
>> +use crate::remotes::RemoteType; + +#[api] +#[derive(Clone, Debug,
>> Default, Deserialize, Serialize)] +#[serde(rename_all =
>> "kebab-case")] +/// Update summary for all remotes. +pub struct
>> UpdateSummary { + /// Map containing the update summary each
>> remote. + pub remotes: RemoteUpdateSummaryWrapper, +} + +// This
>> is a hack to allow actual 'maps' (mapping remote name to per-remote
>> data) +// within the realms of our API macro. +#[derive(Clone, Debug,
>> Default, Deserialize, Serialize)] +#[serde(rename_all =
>> "kebab-case")] +pub struct RemoteUpdateSummaryWrapper { +
>> #[serde(flatten)] + remotes: HashMap<String, RemoteUpdateSummary>,
>> +}
>
> just wondering whether you have considered changing this to
>
> pub struct RemoteUpdateSummaryWrapper(HashMap<String,
> RemoteUpdateSummary>);
>
> would save you a `flatten` from what i can tell?
>
Thanks for the idea, I did not really think about this before. But then
again it does not really have any benefits apart from not having to
write the 'flatten' statement, does it?
>> +impl ApiType for RemoteUpdateSummaryWrapper { + const API_SCHEMA:
>> proxmox_schema::Schema = + ObjectSchema::new("Map of
>> per-remote update summaries", &[]) + .additional_properties(true) +
>> .schema(); +} + +impl Deref for RemoteUpdateSummaryWrapper { +
>> type Target = HashMap<String, RemoteUpdateSummary>; + + fn
>> deref(&self) -> &Self::Target { + &self.remotes + } +} + +impl
>> DerefMut for RemoteUpdateSummaryWrapper { + fn deref_mut(&mut
>> self) -> &mut Self::Target { + &mut self.remotes + } +} +
>> +#[api] +#[derive(Clone, Debug, Deserialize, Serialize)]
>> +#[serde(rename_all = "kebab-case")] +/// Update summary for a single
>> remote. +pub struct RemoteUpdateSummary { + /// Map containing the
>> update summary for each node of this remote. + pub nodes:
>> NodeUpdateSummaryWrapper, + pub remote_type: RemoteType, + pub
>> status: RemoteUpdateStatus, +} + +#[api] +#[derive(Clone, Debug,
>> Deserialize, Serialize, PartialEq)] +#[serde(rename_all =
>> "kebab-case")] +/// Status for the entire remote. +pub enum
>> RemoteUpdateStatus { + /// Successfully polled remote. +
>> Success, + /// Remote could not be polled. + Error, + ///
>> Remote has not been polled yet. + Unknown, +} + +#[derive(Clone,
>> Debug, Default, Deserialize, Serialize)] +#[serde(rename_all =
>> "kebab-case")] +pub struct NodeUpdateSummaryWrapper { +
>> #[serde(flatten)] + nodes: HashMap<String, NodeUpdateSummary>, +}
>> + +impl ApiType for NodeUpdateSummaryWrapper { + const API_SCHEMA:
>> proxmox_schema::Schema = + ObjectSchema::new("Map of per-node
>> update summaries", &[]) + .additional_properties(true) +
>> .schema(); +} + +impl Deref for NodeUpdateSummaryWrapper { + type
>> Target = HashMap<String, NodeUpdateSummary>; + + fn deref(&self)
>> -> &Self::Target { + &self.nodes + } +} + +impl DerefMut
>> for NodeUpdateSummaryWrapper { + fn deref_mut(&mut self) -> &mut
>> Self::Target { + &mut self.nodes + } +} + +#[api]
>> +#[derive(Clone, Debug, Deserialize, Serialize, PartialEq)]
>> +#[serde(rename_all = "kebab-case")] +/// Status for the entire
>> remote. +pub enum NodeUpdateStatus { + /// Successfully polled
>> node. + Success, + /// Node could not be polled. + Error, +}
>> + +#[api] +#[derive(Clone, Debug, Deserialize, Serialize, PartialEq)]
>> +#[serde(rename_all = "kebab-case")] +/// Per-node update summary.
>> +pub struct NodeUpdateSummary { + /// Number of available updates.
>> + pub number_of_updates: u32, + /// Unix timestamp of the last
>> refresh. + pub last_refresh: i64, + /// Status + pub status:
>> NodeUpdateStatus, + /// Status message (e.g. error message) + pub
>> status_message: Option<String>, +}
_______________________________________________
pdm-devel mailing list
pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pdm-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-17 11:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-15 12:46 [pdm-devel] [PATCH proxmox-datacenter-manager 00/12] add global remote update view Lukas Wagner
2025-10-15 12:47 ` [pdm-devel] [PATCH proxmox-datacenter-manager 01/12] metric collection task: tests: add missing parameter for cluster_metric_export Lukas Wagner
2025-10-15 12:47 ` [pdm-devel] [PATCH proxmox-datacenter-manager 02/12] pdm-api-types: add types for remote upgrade summary Lukas Wagner
2025-10-17 10:15 ` Shannon Sterz
2025-10-17 11:12 ` Lukas Wagner [this message]
2025-10-17 11:52 ` Lukas Wagner
2025-10-15 12:47 ` [pdm-devel] [PATCH proxmox-datacenter-manager 03/12] remote updates: add cache for remote update availability Lukas Wagner
2025-10-15 12:47 ` [pdm-devel] [PATCH proxmox-datacenter-manager 04/12] api: add API for retrieving/refreshing the remote update summary Lukas Wagner
2025-10-17 7:44 ` Lukas Wagner
2025-10-17 10:15 ` Shannon Sterz
2025-10-17 11:00 ` Lukas Wagner
2025-10-15 12:47 ` [pdm-devel] [PATCH proxmox-datacenter-manager 05/12] unprivileged api daemon: tasks: add remote update refresh task Lukas Wagner
2025-10-15 12:47 ` [pdm-devel] [PATCH proxmox-datacenter-manager 06/12] pdm-client: add API methods for remote update summaries Lukas Wagner
2025-10-15 12:47 ` [pdm-devel] [PATCH proxmox-datacenter-manager 07/12] pbs-client: add bindings for APT-related API calls Lukas Wagner
2025-10-15 12:47 ` [pdm-devel] [PATCH proxmox-datacenter-manager 08/12] task cache: use separate functions for tracking PVE and PBS tasks Lukas Wagner
2025-10-15 12:47 ` [pdm-devel] [PATCH proxmox-datacenter-manager 09/12] remote updates: add support for PBS remotes Lukas Wagner
2025-10-15 12:47 ` [pdm-devel] [PATCH proxmox-datacenter-manager 10/12] api: add APT endpoints " Lukas Wagner
2025-10-15 12:47 ` [pdm-devel] [PATCH proxmox-datacenter-manager 11/12] ui: add remote update view Lukas Wagner
2025-10-17 10:15 ` Shannon Sterz
2025-10-15 12:47 ` [pdm-devel] [PATCH proxmox-datacenter-manager 12/12] ui: show new remote update view in the 'Remotes' section Lukas Wagner
2025-10-17 10:15 ` [pdm-devel] [PATCH proxmox-datacenter-manager 00/12] add global remote update view Shannon Sterz
2025-10-17 12:14 ` [pdm-devel] superseded: " Lukas Wagner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DDKJW2Q3BE98.2E4NNH50KI19G@proxmox.com \
--to=l.wagner@proxmox.com \
--cc=pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
--cc=s.sterz@proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox