From: Wolfgang Bumiller <w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
To: Gabriel Goller <g.goller@proxmox.com>
Cc: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH pathpatterns] match_list: added `matches_path()` function, which matches only the path
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2023 10:32:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <lzyydypfobw2xbo3han7gdcge4al2fctauj6snyn3kksngzj4w@gmb4dtwwi6sm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c7waqbj7iysa2qjmumsqtajd6sfh6fliknryy4njorg65t2tf7@nt3hanxfqw3u>
On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 10:26:22AM +0200, Wolfgang Bumiller wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 12:19:12PM +0200, Gabriel Goller wrote:
> > Added `matches_path()` function, which only matches against the path and returns
> > an error if a file_mode pattern is found/needed in the matching list. This is
> > useful when we want to check if a file is excluded before running `stat()` on
> > the file to get the file_mode (which could fail).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Gabriel Goller <g.goller@proxmox.com>
> > ---
> > src/match_list.rs | 159 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 158 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/src/match_list.rs b/src/match_list.rs
> > index c5b14e0..acad328 100644
> > --- a/src/match_list.rs
> > +++ b/src/match_list.rs
> > @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> > //! Helpers for include/exclude lists.
> > -
> > use bitflags::bitflags;
> > +use std::fmt;
> >
> > use crate::PatternFlag;
> >
> > @@ -39,6 +39,17 @@ impl Default for MatchFlag {
> > }
> > }
> >
> > +#[derive(Debug, PartialEq)]
> > +pub struct FileModeRequiredForMatching;
>
> Let's shorten this to just `FileModeRequired` ;-)
>
> > +
> > +impl fmt::Display for FileModeRequiredForMatching {
> > + fn fmt(&self, f: &mut fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> fmt::Result {
> > + write!(f, "File mode is required for matching")
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +impl std::error::Error for FileModeRequiredForMatching {}
> > +
> > /// A pattern entry. (Glob patterns or literal patterns.)
> > // Note:
> > // For regex we'd likely use the POSIX extended REs via `regexec(3)`, since we're targetting
> > @@ -304,12 +315,32 @@ impl MatchEntry {
> >
> > self.matches_path_exact(path)
> > }
> > +
> > + /// Check whether the path contains a matching suffix. Returns an error if a file mode is required.
> > + pub fn matches_path<T: AsRef<[u8]>>(
> > + &self,
> > + path: T,
> > + ) -> Result<bool, FileModeRequiredForMatching> {
> > + self.matches_path_do(path.as_ref())
> > + }
> > +
> > + fn matches_path_do(&self, path: &[u8]) -> Result<bool, FileModeRequiredForMatching> {
> > + if !self.flags.contains(MatchFlag::ANY_FILE_TYPE) {
> > + return Err(FileModeRequiredForMatching);
> > + }
> > +
> > + Ok(self.matches_path_suffix_do(path))
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > #[doc(hidden)]
> > pub trait MatchListEntry {
> > fn entry_matches(&self, path: &[u8], file_mode: Option<u32>) -> Option<MatchType>;
> > fn entry_matches_exact(&self, path: &[u8], file_mode: Option<u32>) -> Option<MatchType>;
> > + fn entry_matches_path(
> > + &self,
> > + path: &[u8],
> > + ) -> Result<Option<MatchType>, FileModeRequiredForMatching>;
>
> > }
> >
> > impl MatchListEntry for &'_ MatchEntry {
> > @@ -328,6 +359,21 @@ impl MatchListEntry for &'_ MatchEntry {
> > None
> > }
> > }
> > +
> > + fn entry_matches_path(
> > + &self,
> > + path: &[u8],
> > + ) -> Result<Option<MatchType>, FileModeRequiredForMatching> {
> > + if let Ok(b) = self.matches_path(path) {
>
> This can just use `?`, it's the exact same error type after all.
> (Also `if let Ok` is generally best avoided since the 'else' branch
> discards the error, and if not, it's often a case like this where it can
> juse use '?' ;-) ).
>
> Effectively this could be as short as
>
> Ok(self.matches_path(path)?.then(|| self.match_type()))
>
> > + if b {
>
> As an additional hint: when you nest ifs around things you can match,
> you can just include both cases in the patterns:
> match self.matches_path(path) {
> Ok(true) => Ok(Some(self.match_type())),
> Ok(false) => Ok(None),
> Err(err) => Err(err),
> // where this Err() case already tells you that you can use '?' instead
> }
>
> > + Ok(Some(self.match_type()))
> > + } else {
> > + Ok(None)
> > + }
> > + } else {
> > + Err(FileModeRequiredForMatching)
> > + }
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > impl MatchListEntry for &'_ &'_ MatchEntry {
> > @@ -346,6 +392,21 @@ impl MatchListEntry for &'_ &'_ MatchEntry {
> > None
> > }
> > }
> > +
> > + fn entry_matches_path(
> > + &self,
> > + path: &[u8],
> > + ) -> Result<Option<MatchType>, FileModeRequiredForMatching> {
>
> same
>
> > + if let Ok(b) = self.matches_path(path) {
> > + if b {
> > + Ok(Some(self.match_type()))
> > + } else {
> > + Ok(None)
> > + }
> > + } else {
> > + Err(FileModeRequiredForMatching)
> > + }
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > /// This provides [`matches`](MatchList::matches) and [`matches_exact`](MatchList::matches_exact)
> > @@ -374,6 +435,20 @@ pub trait MatchList {
> > }
> >
> > fn matches_exact_do(&self, path: &[u8], file_mode: Option<u32>) -> Option<MatchType>;
> > +
> > + /// Check whether this list contains anything exactly matching the path, returns error if
> > + /// `file_mode` is required for exact matching.
> > + fn matches_path<T: AsRef<[u8]>>(
> > + &self,
> > + path: T,
> > + ) -> Result<Option<MatchType>, FileModeRequiredForMatching> {
> > + self.matches_path_do(path.as_ref())
> > + }
> > +
> > + fn matches_path_do(
> > + &self,
> > + path: &[u8],
> > + ) -> Result<Option<MatchType>, FileModeRequiredForMatching>;
> > }
> >
> > impl<'a, T> MatchList for T
> > @@ -408,6 +483,24 @@ where
> >
> > None
> > }
> > +
> > + fn matches_path_do(
> > + &self,
> > + path: &[u8],
> > + ) -> Result<Option<MatchType>, FileModeRequiredForMatching> {
>
> Given the amount of tiny match helpers we run through with those 2
> traits already I wonder if we should just make a breaking change here
> instead and only have the versions with the `Result` while users (or
> defaulted helpers in the trait) just pass `file_mode.unwrap_or(!0)`
> (since a mode of 0 should match anything ;-) ).
(of s/of 0/of !0/` of course)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-11 8:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-09 10:19 Gabriel Goller
2023-08-09 10:19 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup v3 1/1] fix #4380: check if file is excluded before running `stat()` Gabriel Goller
2023-08-11 8:51 ` Wolfgang Bumiller
2023-08-14 7:41 ` Gabriel Goller
2023-08-11 8:26 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH pathpatterns] match_list: added `matches_path()` function, which matches only the path Wolfgang Bumiller
2023-08-11 8:32 ` Wolfgang Bumiller [this message]
2023-08-11 8:38 ` Wolfgang Bumiller
2023-08-14 9:32 ` Gabriel Goller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=lzyydypfobw2xbo3han7gdcge4al2fctauj6snyn3kksngzj4w@gmb4dtwwi6sm \
--to=w.bumiller@proxmox.com \
--cc=g.goller@proxmox.com \
--cc=pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox