public inbox for pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Mark Schouten" <mark@tuxis.nl>
To: "Thomas Lamprecht" <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>,
	"Proxmox Backup Server development discussion"
	<pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] Scheduler causing connectivity issues?
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 07:31:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <em8c48fb27-3367-4e7f-9adf-09bac2c8390e@e231eb23.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4a05245f-6bd1-02da-f600-9976c4f1abf5@proxmox.com>

Hi,

>You have 30% of runnable process getting stalled due waiting for IO, that
>naturally should not cause the request accept future to get starved but is
>the reason for why it happened with the current (or better old)
>architecture. Increasing available memory, so that the page cache can hold
>more entries, could already relieve that system a bit.

Thanks. Please note that /var/lib/proxmox is on a different set of disks 
than the datastores. Root pool is on two PM883’s, datastore is lots of 
spinning disks with nvme-special devices. Not sure if that’s relevant in 
your findings, but here you have it :)

Memory upgrade is somewhere on our roadmap.

>We improved on the reproducer we got locally by simulating a higher latency
>disk using dm-delay on a small single core VM.
>
>For one we made the libpve-storage-perl do more efficient list-snapshot
>requests if they can be filtered by VMID, and on the PBS side we moved most
>operations that cause IO (and are related to backup groups/snapshots) to a
>separate thread pool so that the main thread should be less
>congested/blocked.
Given the other responses in this thread, I’m not going to upgrade yet 
to a testing-version in production. Please let me know if there is any 
other info you need from me.

—
Mark Schouten, CTO
Tuxis B.V.
mark@tuxis.nl





  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-07-18  7:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-07 15:49 Mark Schouten
2022-07-08  7:09 ` Thomas Lamprecht
2022-07-08  9:36   ` Jorge Boncompte
2022-07-08  9:40     ` dea
2022-07-11  8:44   ` Mark Schouten
2022-07-13  7:55     ` dea
2022-07-13  8:14     ` Thomas Lamprecht
2022-07-13 10:41       ` Mark Schouten
2022-07-15 11:49         ` Thomas Lamprecht
2022-07-15 12:01           ` dea
2022-07-15 12:57             ` Thomas Lamprecht
2022-07-15 13:02               ` dea
2022-07-15 13:24                 ` dea
2022-07-15 14:43                   ` dea
2022-07-17 15:04                   ` dea
2022-07-18 13:30                     ` Thomas Lamprecht
2022-07-19 11:01                       ` David Lawley
2022-07-19 13:04                         ` Thomas Lamprecht
2022-07-19 15:08                           ` dea
2022-07-18  7:31           ` Mark Schouten [this message]
2022-07-18 11:03             ` Thomas Lamprecht
2022-07-20  7:30               ` Mark Schouten
2022-07-21 13:10                 ` Thomas Lamprecht

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=em8c48fb27-3367-4e7f-9adf-09bac2c8390e@e231eb23.com \
    --to=mark@tuxis.nl \
    --cc=pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
    --cc=t.lamprecht@proxmox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Service provided by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH | Privacy | Legal