From: Philipp Hufnagl <p.hufnagl@proxmox.com>
To: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>,
Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
<pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup] fix #4971: client: Improve output on successful snapshot deletion
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2023 12:48:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e41d3df6-cbbb-44f0-b488-9a47ab97d635@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <065d595d-0b3c-4c64-a675-6f951b7775ec@proxmox.com>
On 10/13/23 18:29, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
> Am 13/10/2023 um 16:57 schrieb Philipp Hufnagl:
>> On 10/13/23 13:30, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
>>> but I'm not sure if we actually want to print anything here, did you
>>> check what the other "action" (i.e., non-GET ones) do, If they all,
>>> or at least most of them, print such reports too it can be fine, but
>>> otherwise this would add inconsistency and simply doing nothing (i.e.,
>>> exiting with SUCCESS) would be enough.
>>>
>> You are right! For example 'proxmox-backup-client snapshot notes
>> update' does not produce any output. Ill make a v 2 on Monday removing
>> the output!
>>
>
>
> FWIW, I do not have anything about outputting such things, especially
> if other devs/users thinks that's fine, or even desired too.
>
> But, if we do more such things then a -q/--quiet flag could be nice, e.g.,
> to avoid stray output in scripts using those commands.
>
> That said, we can always add such output later after you fixed the weird
> Result { null } print, let's keep the scope small for now.
I think you are right here. Since other commands do not output
anything, this command should do that as well for consistency. I think
I should remove the output and we should consider a -v/--verbose flag
in the future.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-16 10:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-03 14:07 Philipp Hufnagl
2023-10-12 13:07 ` Dominik Csapak
2023-10-13 11:30 ` Thomas Lamprecht
2023-10-13 14:57 ` Philipp Hufnagl
2023-10-13 16:29 ` Thomas Lamprecht
2023-10-16 10:48 ` Philipp Hufnagl [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e41d3df6-cbbb-44f0-b488-9a47ab97d635@proxmox.com \
--to=p.hufnagl@proxmox.com \
--cc=pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
--cc=t.lamprecht@proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox