Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup] fix #4466: show snapshots in media content again

[Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>]

On 1/16/23 11:10, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
> meh got already pushed 1:1, for the record:
> 
> misses "tape:" (or "tape inventory:") subsystem tag in subject
> 
> Am 16/01/2023 um 09:21 schrieb Dominik Csapak:
>> while refactoring the the empty media set checks, we accidentally
>> reversed one check from !is_empty to unassigned, which now never
>> included the right media sets.
>>
>> reversing the condition fixes that.
>>
>> fixes
>> 52517f7b: ("tape: hide internal use of all zero uuid for unassigned tapes")
>>
> 
> Please start trailers with a capital letter and avoid extra newlines, i.e.,
> after "Fixes:" (fine to go over ci message length for trailers) and between
> the S-o-b .

sure no problem, should we include that in the developer docs?
(did not find it there)

> 
>> Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
>> ---
>>   src/tape/inventory.rs | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/tape/inventory.rs b/src/tape/inventory.rs
>> index dd560179..1817ab2e 100644
>> --- a/src/tape/inventory.rs
>> +++ b/src/tape/inventory.rs
>> @@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ impl Inventory {
>>               match entry.id.media_set_label {
>>                   None => continue, // not assigned to any pool
>>                   Some(ref set) => {
>> -                    if set.unassigned() {
>> +                    if !set.unassigned() {
>>                           list.push(entry.id.clone());
>>                       }
>>                   }
> 
> I pushed out some lightly related clean ups in surrounding code I stumbled
> into when preparing for pushing these, would be great if you could take
> a second look to ensure I didn't overlooked something.

sure i'll take a look