public inbox for pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Graeme Seaton <lists@graemes.com>
To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
	<pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] Verify, Prune & GC sequence
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 16:31:20 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d9bfbe53-a3e3-2f24-2e67-213ef1548893@graemes.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d3249ddb-e2a6-bf33-450f-ba8109c6dc82@proxmox.com>

Hi Thomas,

Thanks for the reply - didn't really want stay up to midnight to check 
;-)  At the moment, scheduling only allows daily (which is invoked at 
00:00).  If (when?) I can specify custom times then I'll probably use 
the sequence you described.

Regards,

Graeme

On 30/10/2020 11:09, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 30.10.20 10:31, Graeme Seaton wrote:
>> If I have verify, prune & GC all set to run daily do the jobs run concurrently or in sequence?
> Well, you could just try out ;-)
>
> But yes, they can run in parallel.
>
> Since PBS allows multiple potentially interfering operations at the same time (e.g., garbage collect,
> prune, multiple backup creations (only in separate groups), forget, ...), these need to lock against
> each other in certain scenarios. There is no overarching global lock though, instead always the finest
> grained lock possible is used, because running these operations concurrently is treated as a feature
> on its own.
>
> Still, while we handle locking fine grained an admin could try to optimize the order of scheduling
> such things.
>
> 1. Prune, to increase the chance that GC can sweep more data and verify has less to look at.
>     This is rather quick, so one could schedule the next probably half an hour afterwards and
>     be confident it finishes before 2.
>
> 2. GC, as chunks are deleted, which may make verify also faster as it can make the underlying
>     FS faster - but that's rather theory.
>
> 3. Verify
>
> I think the order of 2. and 3. is not to important, but personally, I'd always schedule pruning
> first, can only help.
>
> cheers,
> Thomas
>
>



  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-30 16:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-30  9:31 Graeme Seaton
2020-10-30 11:09 ` Thomas Lamprecht
2020-10-30 16:31   ` Graeme Seaton [this message]
2020-10-30 17:17     ` Thomas Lamprecht
2020-10-31  6:43       ` Dietmar Maurer
2020-10-31  6:53         ` Thomas Lamprecht
2020-10-31  8:27           ` Graeme Seaton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d9bfbe53-a3e3-2f24-2e67-213ef1548893@graemes.com \
    --to=lists@graemes.com \
    --cc=pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Service provided by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH | Privacy | Legal