From: Christian Ebner <c.ebner@proxmox.com>
To: Robert Obkircher <r.obkircher@proxmox.com>,
Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
<pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH v2 proxmox-backup 1/2] datastore: check for null pointer when allocating DynamicIndexHeader
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2026 15:57:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b6b5233b-c858-46c6-ac4c-fac4338b2212@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6a6165e9-e3b9-469d-84c6-bcab95a0426a@proxmox.com>
On 1/7/26 3:28 PM, Robert Obkircher wrote:
>
> On 1/7/26 14:09, Christian Ebner wrote:
>> Please provide a short commit message on why this is done.
> Ok, I'll do that tomorrow, after I've finished the next version of "pipe
> to stdin".
>
>>
>> As far as I see this now panics in handle_alloc_error() if either
>> memory is exhausted or the layout does not fit the allocator
>> constraints, while previously this failed on Box::from_raw() for the
>> null pointer?
Okay, thanks for clarification!
>
> No, in the previous version this was undefined behavior, which is why I
> assumed it should be ok to panic. For example, constructing a box from a
> null can result in `Some(reference) == None` being true [1].
>
> I've also seen the same issue in multiple other places. For example this
> `uninitialized` function [2] is copy-pasted twice. That one is also
> super dangerous, because if you accidentally read from it the compiler
> will most likely delete your code [3]. Creating an uninitialized &mut
> slice itself currently seems to be ok with a lot of asterisks though [4].
>
> [1] https://godbolt.org/z/Ezfqbhqz3
> [2] https://godbolt.org/z/ahx6vs8qz
> [3] https://godbolt.org/z/4MePEKf79
> [4] https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/issues/346
>
>>
>>
>> So maybe better to propagate the allocation error to the call site of
>> zeroed() in DynamicIndexWriter::create() and return it there as well?
> I don't think we can reasonably deal with that situation, because
> returning an anyhow error most likely also requires allocation.
>
> On a Linux system with overcommit enabled, allocations will probably
> never fail anyway, unless the size is something huge like isize::MAX,
> which is more likely to happen for an incorrectly sized Vec than for a Box.
True, also allocation here is 4K only.
>
>>
>> On 12/30/25 1:42 PM, Robert Obkircher wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Robert Obkircher <r.obkircher@proxmox.com>
>>> ---
>>> pbs-datastore/src/dynamic_index.rs | 9 ++++++++-
>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/pbs-datastore/src/dynamic_index.rs b/pbs-datastore/src/
>>> dynamic_index.rs
>>> index ad49cdf3..12df78b1 100644
>>> --- a/pbs-datastore/src/dynamic_index.rs
>>> +++ b/pbs-datastore/src/dynamic_index.rs
>>> @@ -41,13 +41,20 @@ proxmox_lang::static_assert_size!
>>> (DynamicIndexHeader, 4096);
>>> impl DynamicIndexHeader {
>>> /// Convenience method to allocate a zero-initialized header
>>> struct.
>>> pub fn zeroed() -> Box<Self> {
>>> + let layout = std::alloc::Layout::new::<Self>();
>>> unsafe {
>>> -
>>> Box::from_raw(std::alloc::alloc_zeroed(std::alloc::Layout::new::<Self>()) as *mut Self)
>>> + let ptr = std::alloc::alloc_zeroed(layout) as *mut Self;
>>> + if ptr.is_null() {
>>> + std::alloc::handle_alloc_error(layout);
>>> + }
>>> + Box::from_raw(ptr)
>>> }
>>> }
>>> pub fn as_bytes(&self) -> &[u8] {
>>> unsafe {
>>> + // There can't be any uninitialized padding, because the
>>> fields
>>> + // take up all of the statically asserted total size.
>>> std::slice::from_raw_parts(
>>> self as *const Self as *const u8,
>>> std::mem::size_of::<Self>(),
>>
_______________________________________________
pbs-devel mailing list
pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-07 14:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-30 12:39 [pbs-devel] [PATCH v2 proxmox-backup 0/2] prevent potentially unaligned FixedIndexHeader reference Robert Obkircher
2025-12-30 12:39 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH v2 proxmox-backup 1/2] datastore: check for null pointer when allocating DynamicIndexHeader Robert Obkircher
2026-01-07 13:10 ` Christian Ebner
2026-01-07 14:29 ` Robert Obkircher
2026-01-07 14:57 ` Christian Ebner [this message]
2025-12-30 12:39 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH v2 proxmox-backup 2/2] datastore: prevent potentially unaligned FixedIndexHeader reference Robert Obkircher
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b6b5233b-c858-46c6-ac4c-fac4338b2212@proxmox.com \
--to=c.ebner@proxmox.com \
--cc=pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
--cc=r.obkircher@proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox