From: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
<pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>, Stefan Sterz <s.sterz@proxmox.com>,
Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 1/2] fix #3853: api: add force option to tape key change-passphrase
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 16:26:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b4a5d538-72e9-2f79-8632-db6e332b217b@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <10c2b794-7815-30b8-9957-a89acdafcab1@proxmox.com>
On 2/7/22 17:14, Stefan Sterz wrote:
> On 2/7/22 16:57, Stefan Sterz wrote:
>> On 2/7/22 15:58, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
>>> On 07.02.22 13:48, Stefan Sterz wrote:
[snip]
>>>> + // sanity checks for "password xor --force"
>>>> + if force && password.is_some() {
>>>> + bail!("password is not allowed when using force")
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + if !force && password.is_none() {
>>>> + bail!("missing parameter: password")
>>>> + }
>>> Above two if's could be written slightly shorter while IMO even improving readability
>>>
>>> match (force, password) {
>>> (true, Some(_)) => bail!("password is not allowed when using force"),
>>> (false, None) => bail!("missing parameter: password"),
>>> _ => (), // OK
>>> }
>> This does not work, because here password is moved into the match expression. The borrow checker
>> will complain about it being used later on when trying to decrypt the key configuration. You could
>> clone password here, but this solution strikes me as rather "inelegant".
did not look at the rest of the patch really, but i think thats wrong..
couldn't you simply use the reference instead? then the value
will not be moved?
match (force, &password) {
...
}
?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-08 15:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-07 12:48 Stefan Sterz
2022-02-07 12:48 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 2/2] fix #3853: tape cli: add force flag to " Stefan Sterz
2022-02-09 13:56 ` Wolfgang Bumiller
2022-02-07 14:58 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 1/2] fix #3853: api: add force option to tape " Thomas Lamprecht
2022-02-07 16:14 ` Stefan Sterz
2022-02-08 15:26 ` Dominik Csapak [this message]
2022-02-08 15:30 ` Stefan Sterz
2022-02-09 15:54 ` Thomas Lamprecht
2022-02-09 13:52 ` Wolfgang Bumiller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b4a5d538-72e9-2f79-8632-db6e332b217b@proxmox.com \
--to=d.csapak@proxmox.com \
--cc=pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
--cc=s.sterz@proxmox.com \
--cc=t.lamprecht@proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox