public inbox for pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
	<pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
	Hannes Laimer <h.laimer@proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH v3 proxmox-backup 01/14] add two new schemas for verification jobs
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 18:13:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a4939b66-7686-424b-d14b-c484e54fff3b@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201013093309.14917-2-h.laimer@proxmox.com>

On 13.10.20 11:32, Hannes Laimer wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Hannes Laimer <h.laimer@proxmox.com>
> ---
>  src/api2/types/mod.rs | 12 +++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/src/api2/types/mod.rs b/src/api2/types/mod.rs
> index 75b68879..34468dc3 100644
> --- a/src/api2/types/mod.rs
> +++ b/src/api2/types/mod.rs
> @@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ pub const PRUNE_SCHEDULE_SCHEMA: Schema = StringSchema::new(
>      .format(&ApiStringFormat::VerifyFn(crate::tools::systemd::time::verify_calendar_event))
>      .schema();
>  
> -pub const VERIFY_SCHEDULE_SCHEMA: Schema = StringSchema::new(

this breaks build, VERIFY_SCHEDULE_SCHEMA is still used in config::datastore
and the respective API module, you only remove that over 4 (!) patches at the
end of the series.

No commit should ever break the build.
That is a no-go, hard to review and a PITA when doing a bisect.

Also, independent of that, I do not really get why this has to be it's
own patch - why not squash at least patch 01 to 03, they are effectively
one contained change, add a new verification job config with API plumbing.

Having patch 04 then separate can be ok, even wanted, it is not related
directly to the configuration, but patch 05 could be squashed into 04.

patch 06, to 10 is ok as is.

The whole removal should be done as single patch at the end.

I'd also at least add a snipped to drop the now unrecognized "verify-schedule"
field, while we do not care for backwards compat, we also do not want to break
all setups which had this set and force them to use the editor to drop that line.

There are at least two options:

1. a postinst script, similar to what we did for the termproxy change in the tasks
   active log, e.g.:
   # flock -w 30 /etc/proxmox-backup/.datastore.lck sed -i '/^\s\+verify-schedule /d' /etc/proxmox-backup/datastore.cfg

2. keeping a dummy "verify-schedule", with the schema dropped, which always gets deleted
   when writing out

I rather like 1. as it does not makes the real backup code uglier, and it's still
locked, plus we can use the fact that we can check the old version in postinst and
so do this edge triggered only.

> +pub const VERIFICATION_SCHEDULE_SCHEMA: Schema = StringSchema::new(
>      "Run verify job at specified schedule.")
>      .format(&ApiStringFormat::VerifyFn(crate::tools::systemd::time::verify_calendar_event))
>      .schema();
> @@ -324,6 +324,16 @@ pub const REMOVE_VANISHED_BACKUPS_SCHEMA: Schema = BooleanSchema::new(
>      .default(true)
>      .schema();
>  
> +pub const IGNORE_VERIFIED_BACKUPS_SCHEMA: Schema = BooleanSchema::new(
> +    "Do not verify backups that are already verified if their verification is not outdated.")
> +    .default(true)
> +    .schema();
> +
> +pub const VERIFICATION_OUTDATED_AFTER_SCHEMA: Schema = IntegerSchema::new(
> +    "Days after that a verification becomes outdated")
> +        .minimum(1)
> +        .schema();
> +
>  pub const SINGLE_LINE_COMMENT_SCHEMA: Schema = StringSchema::new("Comment (single line).")
>      .format(&SINGLE_LINE_COMMENT_FORMAT)
>      .schema();
> 






  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-15 16:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-13  9:32 [pbs-devel] [PATCH v3 proxmox-backup 00/14] add job based verify scheduling Hannes Laimer
2020-10-13  9:32 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH v3 proxmox-backup 01/14] add two new schemas for verification jobs Hannes Laimer
2020-10-15 16:13   ` Thomas Lamprecht [this message]
2020-10-13  9:32 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH v3 proxmox-backup 02/14] add verification job config Hannes Laimer
2020-10-13  9:32 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH v3 proxmox-backup 03/14] api2: add verify job config endpoint Hannes Laimer
2020-10-13  9:32 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH v3 proxmox-backup 04/14] add do_verification_job function to verify.rs Hannes Laimer
2020-10-15 16:15   ` Thomas Lamprecht
2020-10-13  9:33 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH v3 proxmox-backup 05/14] api2: add verification job admin endpoint Hannes Laimer
2020-10-13  9:33 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH v3 proxmox-backup 06/14] add scheduling for verification jobs Hannes Laimer
2020-10-13  9:33 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH v3 proxmox-backup 07/14] set a diffrent worker_type based on what is going to be verified(snapshot, group, ds) Hannes Laimer
2020-10-13  9:33 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH v3 proxmox-backup 08/14] ui: add verification job view Hannes Laimer
2020-10-13  9:33 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH v3 proxmox-backup 09/14] ui: add verification job edit window Hannes Laimer
2020-10-13  9:33 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH v3 proxmox-backup 10/14] ui: add task descriptions for the different types of verification(job, snapshpt, group, ds) Hannes Laimer
2020-10-13  9:33 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH v3 proxmox-backup 11/14] remove verify_schedule field from datastore config endpoint Hannes Laimer
2020-10-13  9:33 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH v3 proxmox-backup 12/14] remove verify_schedule field from DatastoreConfig Hannes Laimer
2020-10-13  9:33 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH v3 proxmox-backup 13/14] remove verify-schedule field from DataStoreEdit and DataStoreConfig Hannes Laimer
2020-10-13  9:33 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH v3 proxmox-backup 14/14] remove old verification scheduling from proxmox-backup-proxy.rs Hannes Laimer
2020-10-15 16:18   ` Thomas Lamprecht
2020-10-14 11:55 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH v3 proxmox-backup 00/14] add job based verify scheduling Wolfgang Bumiller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a4939b66-7686-424b-d14b-c484e54fff3b@proxmox.com \
    --to=t.lamprecht@proxmox.com \
    --cc=h.laimer@proxmox.com \
    --cc=pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Service provided by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH | Privacy | Legal