From: "Shannon Sterz" <s.sterz@proxmox.com>
To: "Christian Ebner" <c.ebner@proxmox.com>
Cc: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
<pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 1/3] pbs-config: cache verified API token secrets
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2025 12:25:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DF0GDMBOXT7J.1QU9KF03XGDP6@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1135e035-0c16-4fbd-813d-96b1b850b888@proxmox.com>
On Wed Dec 17, 2025 at 12:16 PM CET, Christian Ebner wrote:
> On 12/9/25 2:29 PM, Samuel Rufinatscha wrote:
>> On 12/5/25 3:03 PM, Shannon Sterz wrote:
>>> On Fri Dec 5, 2025 at 2:25 PM CET, Samuel Rufinatscha wrote:
>>>> Currently, every token-based API request reads the token.shadow file and
>>>> runs the expensive password hash verification for the given token
>>>> secret. This shows up as a hotspot in /status profiling (see
>>>> bug #6049 [1]).
>>>>
>>>> This patch introduces an in-memory cache of successfully verified token
>>>> secrets. Subsequent requests for the same token+secret combination only
>>>> perform a comparison using openssl::memcmp::eq and avoid re-running the
>>>> password hash. The cache is updated when a token secret is set and
>>>> cleared when a token is deleted. Note, this does NOT include manual
>>>> config changes, which will be covered in a subsequent patch.
>>>>
>>>> This patch partly fixes bug #6049 [1].
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=7017
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Samuel Rufinatscha <s.rufinatscha@proxmox.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> pbs-config/src/token_shadow.rs | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>> 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/pbs-config/src/token_shadow.rs b/pbs-config/src/
>>>> token_shadow.rs
>>>> index 640fabbf..47aa2fc2 100644
>>>> --- a/pbs-config/src/token_shadow.rs
>>>> +++ b/pbs-config/src/token_shadow.rs
>>>> @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
>>>> use std::collections::HashMap;
>>>> +use std::sync::RwLock;
>>>>
>>>> use anyhow::{bail, format_err, Error};
>>>> +use once_cell::sync::OnceCell;
>>>> use serde::{Deserialize, Serialize};
>>>> use serde_json::{from_value, Value};
>>>>
>>>> @@ -13,6 +15,13 @@ use crate::{open_backup_lockfile, BackupLockGuard};
>>>> const LOCK_FILE: &str = pbs_buildcfg::configdir!("/
>>>> token.shadow.lock");
>>>> const CONF_FILE: &str = pbs_buildcfg::configdir!("/token.shadow");
>>>>
>>>> +/// Global in-memory cache for successfully verified API token secrets.
>>>> +/// The cache stores plain text secrets for token Authids that have
>>>> already been
>>>> +/// verified against the hashed values in `token.shadow`. This
>>>> allows for cheap
>>>> +/// subsequent authentications for the same token+secret
>>>> combination, avoiding
>>>> +/// recomputing the password hash on every request.
>>>> +static TOKEN_SECRET_CACHE: OnceCell<RwLock<ApiTokenSecretCache>> =
>>>> OnceCell::new();
>>>
>>> any reason you are using a once cell with a cutom get_or_init function
>>> instead of a simple `LazyCell` [1] here? seems to me that this would be
>>> the more appropriate type here? similar question for the
>>> proxmox-access-control portion of this series.
>>>
>>> [1]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/cell/struct.LazyCell.html
>>>
>>
>> Good point, we should / can directly initialize it! Will change
>> to LazyCell. Thanks!
>
> LazyCell is however not thread safe, so could cause issues with
> concurrent inits from different threads. IMO std::sync::LazyLock [0] is
> a better fit here and follows along the line of what we do for other
> caches in PBS, e.g. in pbs-config::user.
>
> [0] https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/sync/struct.LazyLock.html
ah right, yes that makes a lot of sense, thanks for catching that.
_______________________________________________
pbs-devel mailing list
pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-17 11:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-05 13:25 [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox{-backup, } 0/6] Reduce token.shadow verification overhead Samuel Rufinatscha
2025-12-05 13:25 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 1/3] pbs-config: cache verified API token secrets Samuel Rufinatscha
2025-12-05 14:04 ` Shannon Sterz
2025-12-09 13:29 ` Samuel Rufinatscha
2025-12-17 11:16 ` Christian Ebner
2025-12-17 11:25 ` Shannon Sterz [this message]
2025-12-10 11:47 ` Fabian Grünbichler
2025-12-10 15:35 ` Samuel Rufinatscha
2025-12-15 15:05 ` Samuel Rufinatscha
2025-12-15 19:00 ` Samuel Rufinatscha
2025-12-16 8:16 ` Fabian Grünbichler
2025-12-05 13:25 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 2/3] pbs-config: invalidate token-secret cache on token.shadow changes Samuel Rufinatscha
2025-12-05 13:25 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 3/3] pbs-config: add TTL window to token secret cache Samuel Rufinatscha
2025-12-05 13:25 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox 1/3] proxmox-access-control: cache verified API token secrets Samuel Rufinatscha
2025-12-05 13:25 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox 2/3] proxmox-access-control: invalidate token-secret cache on token.shadow changes Samuel Rufinatscha
2025-12-05 13:25 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox 3/3] proxmox-access-control: add TTL window to token secret cache Samuel Rufinatscha
2025-12-05 14:06 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox{-backup, } 0/6] Reduce token.shadow verification overhead Shannon Sterz
2025-12-09 13:58 ` Samuel Rufinatscha
2025-12-17 16:27 ` [pbs-devel] superseded: " Samuel Rufinatscha
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DF0GDMBOXT7J.1QU9KF03XGDP6@proxmox.com \
--to=s.sterz@proxmox.com \
--cc=c.ebner@proxmox.com \
--cc=pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox