public inbox for pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Gabriel Goller" <g.goller@proxmox.com>
To: "Dominik Csapak" <d.csapak@proxmox.com>,
	"Proxmox Backup Server development discussion"
	<pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 1/2] gui: remove document.execCommand calls
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 10:08:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CZTCS4F7CR0R.VTGJIS76FIKQ@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2524761d-e6b9-4d89-84ef-03d261029f92@proxmox.com>

On Thu Mar 14, 2024 at 8:59 AM CET, Dominik Csapak wrote:
> hi,
>
> just to note: changing to an async function can be rather dangerous,
> sometimes extjs not only calls the handlers/events/etc. but does things
> after them (expecting the function to be finished) or waits for the return value.

Hmm, but does it actually **await** the return value? I'm not a ext.js
expert but I don't think it is. Anyways it's fine because js promises
are executed eagerly + promise returned directly.

> (most of the extjs code was from before async/await was a thing in js)
>
> so here it seems to work out fine, but we have to be careful with
> sprinkling async function in the code, otherwise we'll get
> very unexpected results
>
> in general, i'd like to see that mentioned in the commit message
> why it's ok to do that (no hard feelings though)
>
> otherwise LGTM

What do you think about adding this to the commit message:

    Making the handler functions async is not a problem, because
    promises in js are executed eagerly (not lazily) and nothing
    depends/waits on the result of this handler.




  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-14  9:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-13 16:17 Gabriel Goller
2024-03-13 16:17 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 2/2] fix #5188: gui: add copy to clipboard on snapshots Gabriel Goller
2024-03-14  8:01   ` Dominik Csapak
2024-03-14  9:10     ` Gabriel Goller
2024-03-14  7:59 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 1/2] gui: remove document.execCommand calls Dominik Csapak
2024-03-14  9:08   ` Gabriel Goller [this message]
2024-03-14  9:13     ` Dominik Csapak
2024-03-14  9:21       ` Gabriel Goller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CZTCS4F7CR0R.VTGJIS76FIKQ@proxmox.com \
    --to=g.goller@proxmox.com \
    --cc=d.csapak@proxmox.com \
    --cc=pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Service provided by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH | Privacy | Legal