From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
<pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
Wolfgang Bumiller <w.bumiller@proxmox.com>,
Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 6/6] api: admin: datastore: implement streaming content api call
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2025 16:22:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <897f41d8-2337-423d-a128-0252056b936b@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fe7wgj7jjubyyzxorsefl2xpzgg4iyuem5t4n3elo5dz6papjr@z5wftp2afyyf>
Am 07.10.25 um 14:51 schrieb Wolfgang Bumiller:
> And more reasons why [this][1] *really* needs at least *partial*
> stabilization so we can switch to `Item` level imports. 🙄
>
> [1] https://github.com/rust-lang/rustfmt/issues/4991#issuecomment-3369792412
In practice I'd prefer module level granularity though and instead
question if crates like pbs-api-types really do need to re-export
everything on a top-level instead of using actual modules there
too. Which as a side effect then would also lessen the need for adding
ThingListItem type names, which are IMO somewhat needed (or at least
will always be something that devs go for) if we want to provide a
single global type namespace.
_______________________________________________
pbs-devel mailing list
pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-07 14:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-03 8:50 [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox{, -backup} 0/7] introduce " Dominik Csapak
2025-10-03 8:50 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox 1/1] pbs-api-types: add api types for " Dominik Csapak
2025-10-07 8:59 ` Wolfgang Bumiller
2025-10-08 6:41 ` Dominik Csapak
2025-10-03 8:50 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 1/6] backup: hierarchy: add new can_access_any_namespace_in_range helper Dominik Csapak
2025-10-03 9:52 ` Thomas Lamprecht
2025-10-03 10:10 ` Dominik Csapak
2025-10-03 10:21 ` Thomas Lamprecht
2025-10-03 8:50 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 2/6] backup: hierarchy: reuse 'NS_PRIVS_OK' for namespace helper Dominik Csapak
2025-10-03 8:50 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 3/6] api: admin: datastore: refactor BackupGroup to GroupListItem conversion Dominik Csapak
2025-10-03 8:50 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 4/6] api: admin: datastore: factor out 'get_group_owner' Dominik Csapak
2025-10-03 8:50 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 5/6] api: admin: datastore: optimize `groups` api call Dominik Csapak
2025-10-03 10:18 ` Thomas Lamprecht
2025-10-03 10:51 ` Dominik Csapak
2025-10-03 12:37 ` Thomas Lamprecht
2025-10-03 8:50 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 6/6] api: admin: datastore: implement streaming content " Dominik Csapak
2025-10-03 11:55 ` Thomas Lamprecht
2025-10-07 12:51 ` Wolfgang Bumiller
2025-10-07 14:22 ` Thomas Lamprecht [this message]
2025-10-07 14:31 ` Wolfgang Bumiller
2025-10-07 15:05 ` Thomas Lamprecht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=897f41d8-2337-423d-a128-0252056b936b@proxmox.com \
--to=t.lamprecht@proxmox.com \
--cc=d.csapak@proxmox.com \
--cc=pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
--cc=w.bumiller@proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox