From: Wolfgang Bumiller <w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
To: Hannes Laimer <h.laimer@proxmox.com>
Cc: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup v2] datastore: simplify update-datastore-cache socket command
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 09:32:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <745u27p6cav7bmy424rwwncyqv5bipgvypqbq3cgw3foavpfjc@pzfiwpoyftbt> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240819094522.135756-1-h.laimer@proxmox.com>
On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 11:45:22AM GMT, Hannes Laimer wrote:
> ... by always dropping the cache entry and not allowing it to be
> re-added based on the maintenance mode. The check is only needed for
What "check are you referring to here?
> `Lookup` operations since lookups with those wouldn't fail based on
> maintenance mode alone. Already running tasks won't be affected and
> since they're the only ones holding a reference to a DataStore, it,
> and the file handles it holds will be dropped automatically once the
> (last) task finishes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hannes Laimer <h.laimer@proxmox.com>
> ---
> v2:
> - rebase onto master
>
> pbs-datastore/src/datastore.rs | 26 ++++++++++----------------
> src/api2/config/datastore.rs | 7 +++----
> src/bin/proxmox-backup-proxy.rs | 6 +++---
> 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/pbs-datastore/src/datastore.rs b/pbs-datastore/src/datastore.rs
> index d0f3c53a..69b4c83e 100644
> --- a/pbs-datastore/src/datastore.rs
> +++ b/pbs-datastore/src/datastore.rs
> @@ -183,10 +183,15 @@ impl DataStore {
> )?)
> };
>
> + let is_offline = config
> + .get_maintenance_mode()
> + .map_or(false, |m| m.is_offline());
> let datastore = DataStore::with_store_and_config(chunk_store, config, Some(digest))?;
>
> let datastore = Arc::new(datastore);
> - datastore_cache.insert(name.to_string(), datastore.clone());
> + if !is_offline {
> + datastore_cache.insert(name.to_string(), datastore.clone());
> + }
So previously we always only ever had 1 DataStore+ChunkStore pair. Now,
we can have multiple instances for an offline data store, as well as
after receiving an "update-datastore-cache" command, which now forces
multiple instances.
This seems to go against the original idea here. Why do we want this?
>
> if let Some(operation) = operation {
> update_active_operations(name, operation, 1)?;
> @@ -208,21 +213,10 @@ impl DataStore {
> Ok(())
> }
>
> - /// trigger clearing cache entry based on maintenance mode. Entry will only
> - /// be cleared iff there is no other task running, if there is, the end of the
> - /// last running task will trigger the clearing of the cache entry.
> - pub fn update_datastore_cache(name: &str) -> Result<(), Error> {
> - let (config, _digest) = pbs_config::datastore::config()?;
> - let datastore: DataStoreConfig = config.lookup("datastore", name)?;
> - if datastore
> - .get_maintenance_mode()
> - .map_or(false, |m| m.is_offline())
> - {
> - // the datastore drop handler does the checking if tasks are running and clears the
> - // cache entry, so we just have to trigger it here
> - let _ = DataStore::lookup_datastore(name, Some(Operation::Lookup));
> - }
> -
> + /// removes datastore from cache
> + pub fn drop_from_datastore_cache(name: &str) -> Result<(), Error> {
There's no remaining error case here, so we wouldn't need a `Result`.
> + let mut datastore_cache = DATASTORE_MAP.lock().unwrap();
> + datastore_cache.remove(name);
> Ok(())
> }
>
> diff --git a/src/api2/config/datastore.rs b/src/api2/config/datastore.rs
> index ca6edf05..65d88265 100644
> --- a/src/api2/config/datastore.rs
> +++ b/src/api2/config/datastore.rs
> @@ -396,16 +396,15 @@ pub fn update_datastore(
> data.tuning = update.tuning;
> }
>
> - let mut maintenance_mode_changed = false;
> + let mut drop_store_from_cache = false;
> if update.maintenance_mode.is_some() {
> - maintenance_mode_changed = data.maintenance_mode != update.maintenance_mode;
> -
> let maintenance_mode = match update.maintenance_mode {
> Some(mode_str) => Some(MaintenanceMode::deserialize(
> proxmox_schema::de::SchemaDeserializer::new(mode_str, &MaintenanceMode::API_SCHEMA),
> )?),
> None => None,
> };
> + drop_store_from_cache = maintenance_mode.as_ref().map_or(false, |m| m.is_offline());
(This could be set in the `Some` match arm more efficiently as it
already defaults to false)
> data.set_maintenance_mode(maintenance_mode)?;
> }
>
> @@ -420,7 +419,7 @@ pub fn update_datastore(
> }
>
> // tell the proxy it might have to clear a cache entry
The comment is now wrong.
> - if maintenance_mode_changed {
> + if drop_store_from_cache {
> tokio::spawn(async move {
> if let Ok(proxy_pid) =
> proxmox_rest_server::read_pid(pbs_buildcfg::PROXMOX_BACKUP_PROXY_PID_FN)
> diff --git a/src/bin/proxmox-backup-proxy.rs b/src/bin/proxmox-backup-proxy.rs
> index 041f3aff..04622d43 100644
> --- a/src/bin/proxmox-backup-proxy.rs
> +++ b/src/bin/proxmox-backup-proxy.rs
> @@ -274,11 +274,11 @@ async fn run() -> Result<(), Error> {
> Ok(Value::Null)
> })?;
>
> - // clear cache entry for datastore that is in a specific maintenance mode
> + // clear cache entry for datastore
> command_sock.register_command("update-datastore-cache".to_string(), |value| {
> if let Some(name) = value.and_then(Value::as_str) {
> - if let Err(err) = DataStore::update_datastore_cache(name) {
> - log::error!("could not trigger update datastore cache: {err}");
> + if let Err(err) = DataStore::drop_from_datastore_cache(name) {
> + log::error!("could not drop datastore from cache: {err}");
> }
> }
> Ok(Value::Null)
> --
> 2.39.2
_______________________________________________
pbs-devel mailing list
pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-22 7:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-19 9:45 Hannes Laimer
2024-08-22 7:32 ` Wolfgang Bumiller [this message]
2024-08-22 13:58 ` Hannes Laimer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=745u27p6cav7bmy424rwwncyqv5bipgvypqbq3cgw3foavpfjc@pzfiwpoyftbt \
--to=w.bumiller@proxmox.com \
--cc=h.laimer@proxmox.com \
--cc=pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox