From: Hannes Laimer <h.laimer@proxmox.com>
To: Christian Ebner <c.ebner@proxmox.com>,
Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
<pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup v3 1/3] fix #6195: api: datastore: add endpoint for moving namespaces
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 10:27:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <73c2f285-7ca6-414e-8147-88085e00ee85@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <842c5799-8b2e-4386-8d70-1614f6409df9@proxmox.com>
On 15.09.25 10:15, Christian Ebner wrote:
> Thanks for having a go at this issue, I did not yet have an in depth
> look at this but unfortunately I'm afraid the current implementation
> approach will not work for the S3 backend (and might also have issues
> for local datastores).
>
> Copying the S3 objects is not an atomic operation and will take some
> time, so leaves you open for race conditions. E.g. while you copy
> contents, a new backup snapshot might be created in one of the already
> copied backup groups, which will then however be deleted afterwards.
> Same is true for pruning, and other metadata editing operations such as
> adding notes, backup task logs, ecc.
>
Yes, but not really. We lock the `active_operations` tracking file, so
no new read/write operations can be started after we start the moving
process. There's a short comment in the API endpoint function.
I'm not sure there is much value in more granular locking, I mean, is
half a successful move worth much? Unless we add some kind of rollback,
but tbh, I feel like that would not be worth the effort I think.
> So IMO this must be tackled on a group level, making sure to get an
> exclusive lock for each group (on the source as well as target of the
> move operation) before doing any manipulation. Only then it is okay to
> do any non-atomic operations.
>
> The moving of the namespace must then be implemented as batch operations
> on the groups and sub-namespaces.
>
> This should be handled the same also for regular datastores, to avoid
> any races there to.
_______________________________________________
pbs-devel mailing list
pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-15 8:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-11 9:49 [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup v3 0/3] fixes #6195: add support " Hannes Laimer
2025-09-11 9:49 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup v3 1/3] fix #6195: api: datastore: add endpoint " Hannes Laimer
2025-09-15 8:16 ` Christian Ebner
2025-09-15 8:27 ` Hannes Laimer [this message]
2025-09-15 8:56 ` Christian Ebner
2025-09-15 9:19 ` Hannes Laimer
2025-09-15 10:01 ` Christian Ebner
2025-09-15 10:32 ` Hannes Laimer
2025-09-11 9:49 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup v3 2/3] fix #6195: ui: add button/window for moving a namespace Hannes Laimer
2025-09-11 9:49 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup v3 3/3] docs: add section for moving datastores Hannes Laimer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=73c2f285-7ca6-414e-8147-88085e00ee85@proxmox.com \
--to=h.laimer@proxmox.com \
--cc=c.ebner@proxmox.com \
--cc=pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox