From: Christian Ebner <c.ebner@proxmox.com>
To: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>,
Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
<pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 1/2] fix: ui: sync job: switch rate limit based on sync direction
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 13:34:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3d8a2d32-5909-47c3-a8c1-195850b0ca92@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <69533b86-7d14-41a5-8355-9eade40301b9@proxmox.com>
On 3/17/25 12:56, Dominik Csapak wrote:
> On 3/17/25 11:32, Christian Ebner wrote:
>> On 3/17/25 11:07, Dominik Csapak wrote:
>>> High level comment:
>>>
>>> I know it's preexisting, bu does it even make sense to have a 'rate-
>>> in' and 'rate-out' for sync
>>> jobs? would it not make more sense to have a single 'rate' parameter
>>> and apply it to both
>>> directions?
>>
>> You mean only as additional parameter for the api endpoint for sync
>> job config creation and update? Or as parameter for the sync job
>> config itself?
>>
>> The former might be the better option, and one can check if both rate
>> and rate-in/out were set and abort with error in that case or abort
>> with error if a rate-in was configured for a push or rate-out for a pull?
>>
>
> i had actually imagined 3 options for the sync job config
> rate: limits both in/out
> rate-in/out: precedence over rate, limits the respective direction
>
> and only expose the 'rate' option on the ui
>
>
>
>>>
>>> we could maybe introduce a new parameter now to replace both 'rate-
>>> in' and 'rate-out' and
>>> use that? we could even maybe leave all three if some users really
>>> prefer to set the
>>> limits seperately.
>>
>> You mean rate as fallback if rate-in/out are not explicitly set?
>
> no i mean as main parameter (see above) and rate-in/out only for users
> that want to explicitly handle the different directions
>
> (AFAIK there is not much data flowing in the opposite direction of
> the sync job, but one might still want to control that)
>
> the advantage is that it's backwards compatible for existing setups
>
>>
>>>
>>> one comment inline
>>>
>>> On 3/10/25 18:01, Christian Ebner wrote:
>>>> Commit 9aa213b8 ("config: sync: use same config section type `sync`
>>>> for push and pull") adapted the sync job edit so jobs in both, push
>>>> and pull can be edited using the same window. This however did not
>>>> include the switching of the direction to which the http client rate
>>>> limit is applied to.
>>>>
>>>> Fix this by renaming the field to `rate-limit` and conditionally
>>>> settings the values to `rate-in` or `rate-out`.
>>>>
>>>> Reported in the community forum:
>>>> https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/163414/
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 9aa213b8 ("config: sync: use same config section type `sync`
>>>> for push and pull")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Christian Ebner <c.ebner@proxmox.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> www/window/SyncJobEdit.js | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
>>>> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/www/window/SyncJobEdit.js b/www/window/SyncJobEdit.js
>>>> index bcd2f2fb2..f980a2efd 100644
>>>> --- a/www/window/SyncJobEdit.js
>>>> +++ b/www/window/SyncJobEdit.js
>>>> @@ -86,6 +86,13 @@ Ext.define('PBS.window.SyncJobEdit', {
>>>> } else {
>>>> values.location = 'remote';
>>>> }
>>>> + if (values['rate-out'] && me.syncDirection === 'push') {
>>>> + values['rate-limit'] = values['rate-out'];
>>>> + delete values['rate-out'];
>>>> + } else if (values['rate-in']) {
>>>> + values['rate-limit'] = values['rate-in'];
>>>> + delete values['rate-in'];
>>>> + }
>>>> me.callParent([values]);
>>>> },
>>>> @@ -103,8 +110,15 @@ Ext.define('PBS.window.SyncJobEdit', {
>>>> if (!values.id && me.up('pbsSyncJobEdit').isCreate) {
>>>> values.id = 's-' +
>>>> Ext.data.identifier.Uuid.Global.generate().slice(0, 13);
>>>> }
>>>> + if (values['rate-limit'] && me.syncDirection === 'push') {
>>>> + values['rate-out'] = values['rate-limit'];
>>>> + } else {
>>>> + values['rate-in'] = values['rate-limit'];
>>>> + }
>>>> + delete values['rate-limit'];
>>>> if (!me.isCreate) {
>>>> PBS.Utils.delete_if_default(values, 'rate-in');
>>>> + PBS.Utils.delete_if_default(values, 'rate-out');
>>>
>>> this now deletes values set in the backend, or not?
>>>
>>> e.g. i had set
>>> rate-in: 10
>>> rate-out: 15
>>>
>>> then i update the config in the GUI and depending on the sync job
>>> direction,
>>> the other gets deleted from the config.
>>> (that's one reason where a single rate limit setting would make sense)
>>
>> Yes, this clears the rate limit for the direction in which it does not
>> make sense at the moment.
>
> i disagree that the reverse direction makes no sense (only a little ;) )
> i.e. pulling the snapshot list will count to the rate-in limit AFAIU
> and sometimes it may make sense to configure that...
Overlooked that part of your response, sorry!
Yes, that is true and if explicitly set should be honored: However,
given this argument it might even be better to allow explicitly set both
rates in the sync job edit window instead of having the combined `rate`
field. This would allow to keep things backwards compatible without the
need to merge much and give the user the ability to set both as desired
without much hustle? And maybe a tooltip describing which to set best
under which conditions?
_______________________________________________
pbs-devel mailing list
pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-17 12:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-10 17:01 Christian Ebner
2025-03-10 17:01 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 2/2] docs: mention how to set the push sync jobs rate limit Christian Ebner
2025-03-17 10:07 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 1/2] fix: ui: sync job: switch rate limit based on sync direction Dominik Csapak
2025-03-17 10:32 ` Christian Ebner
2025-03-17 10:42 ` Christian Ebner
2025-03-17 11:56 ` Dominik Csapak
2025-03-17 12:11 ` Christian Ebner
2025-03-17 12:36 ` Dominik Csapak
2025-03-17 12:54 ` Christian Ebner
2025-03-17 13:01 ` Dominik Csapak
2025-03-17 13:17 ` Christian Ebner
2025-03-17 12:34 ` Christian Ebner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3d8a2d32-5909-47c3-a8c1-195850b0ca92@proxmox.com \
--to=c.ebner@proxmox.com \
--cc=d.csapak@proxmox.com \
--cc=pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Service provided by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH | Privacy | Legal