From: Robert Obkircher <r.obkircher@proxmox.com>
To: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 proxmox 2/6] io: request zeroed memory instead of manually clearing it
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2026 10:23:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260812082549.21561-3-r.obkircher@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260812082549.21561-1-r.obkircher@proxmox.com>
A quick comparison using cargo bench showed no notable differences in
release mode, but in debug mode 1 GiB allocations by themselves got
43879 times faster. This is because the standard library continued to
call alloc_zeroed, matching release mode, while the previous version
actually had to touch the memory. With an additional .fill(1) the
speedup shrank to around 1.09x.
Signed-off-by: Robert Obkircher <r.obkircher@proxmox.com>
---
proxmox-io/src/boxed.rs | 7 ++-----
proxmox-io/src/vec/mod.rs | 6 +-----
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/proxmox-io/src/boxed.rs b/proxmox-io/src/boxed.rs
index 7af51cfc..fb67bfd7 100644
--- a/proxmox-io/src/boxed.rs
+++ b/proxmox-io/src/boxed.rs
@@ -12,9 +12,6 @@ pub fn uninitialized(len: usize) -> Box<[u8]> {
/// Zero-initialized bytes, meant for large sizes to avoid busting the stack.
pub fn zeroed(len: usize) -> Box<[u8]> {
- let mut bytes = uninitialized(len);
- unsafe {
- std::ptr::write_bytes(bytes.as_mut_ptr(), 0, bytes.len());
- }
- bytes
+ // vec! guarantees not to over-allocate, so shrink_to_fit inside into_boxed_slice does nothing
+ vec![0; len].into_boxed_slice()
}
diff --git a/proxmox-io/src/vec/mod.rs b/proxmox-io/src/vec/mod.rs
index b68fc750..7fe106e8 100644
--- a/proxmox-io/src/vec/mod.rs
+++ b/proxmox-io/src/vec/mod.rs
@@ -69,11 +69,7 @@ pub fn clear(data: &mut [u8]) {
/// Create a newly allocated, zero initialized byte vector.
#[inline]
pub fn zeroed(len: usize) -> Vec<u8> {
- unsafe {
- let mut out = uninitialized(len);
- clear(&mut out);
- out
- }
+ vec![0; len]
}
/// Create a newly allocated byte vector of a specific size with "undefined" content.
--
2.47.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-12 8:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-12 8:23 [PATCH v2 proxmox 0/6] uninitialized memory allocations fixes Robert Obkircher
2026-08-12 8:23 ` [PATCH v2 proxmox 1/6] uuid: avoid potential null dereference and memory leaks Robert Obkircher
2026-08-12 8:23 ` Robert Obkircher [this message]
2026-08-12 8:23 ` [PATCH v2 proxmox 3/6] io: avoid potential null dereference and memory leak on error path Robert Obkircher
2026-08-12 8:23 ` [PATCH v2 proxmox 4/6] io: remove boxed::uninitialized because it is unsound Robert Obkircher
2026-08-12 8:23 ` [PATCH v2 proxmox 5/6] io: remove unused append_to_vec functions Robert Obkircher
2026-08-12 8:23 ` [PATCH v2 proxmox 6/6] io: remove unused ByteVecExt trait with grow_ and resize_uninitialized Robert Obkircher
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260812082549.21561-3-r.obkircher@proxmox.com \
--to=r.obkircher@proxmox.com \
--cc=pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox