* [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup] rrd: use saturating_sub to avoid underflow
@ 2021-10-28 9:40 Dominik Csapak
2021-10-28 10:56 ` [pbs-devel] applied: " Wolfgang Bumiller
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dominik Csapak @ 2021-10-28 9:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pbs-devel
Without this, the tests fail in debug mode.
Also having start (u64) underflow to a value greater than end does
not really make sense
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
---
proxmox-rrd/src/rrd.rs | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/proxmox-rrd/src/rrd.rs b/proxmox-rrd/src/rrd.rs
index 20bf6ae3..2fab9df3 100644
--- a/proxmox-rrd/src/rrd.rs
+++ b/proxmox-rrd/src/rrd.rs
@@ -469,7 +469,7 @@ impl RRD {
match rra {
Some(rra) => {
let end = end.unwrap_or_else(|| proxmox_time::epoch_f64() as u64);
- let start = start.unwrap_or(end - 10*rra.resolution);
+ let start = start.unwrap_or(end.saturating_sub(10*rra.resolution));
Ok(rra.extract_data(start, end, self.source.last_update))
}
None => bail!("unable to find RRA suitable ({:?}:{})", cf, resolution),
--
2.30.2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [pbs-devel] applied: [PATCH proxmox-backup] rrd: use saturating_sub to avoid underflow
2021-10-28 9:40 [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup] rrd: use saturating_sub to avoid underflow Dominik Csapak
@ 2021-10-28 10:56 ` Wolfgang Bumiller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Bumiller @ 2021-10-28 10:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dominik Csapak; +Cc: pbs-devel
applied
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 11:40:44AM +0200, Dominik Csapak wrote:
> Without this, the tests fail in debug mode.
> Also having start (u64) underflow to a value greater than end does
> not really make sense
>
> Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
> ---
> proxmox-rrd/src/rrd.rs | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/proxmox-rrd/src/rrd.rs b/proxmox-rrd/src/rrd.rs
> index 20bf6ae3..2fab9df3 100644
> --- a/proxmox-rrd/src/rrd.rs
> +++ b/proxmox-rrd/src/rrd.rs
> @@ -469,7 +469,7 @@ impl RRD {
> match rra {
> Some(rra) => {
> let end = end.unwrap_or_else(|| proxmox_time::epoch_f64() as u64);
> - let start = start.unwrap_or(end - 10*rra.resolution);
> + let start = start.unwrap_or(end.saturating_sub(10*rra.resolution));
> Ok(rra.extract_data(start, end, self.source.last_update))
> }
> None => bail!("unable to find RRA suitable ({:?}:{})", cf, resolution),
> --
> 2.30.2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-10-28 10:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-10-28 9:40 [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup] rrd: use saturating_sub to avoid underflow Dominik Csapak
2021-10-28 10:56 ` [pbs-devel] applied: " Wolfgang Bumiller
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox