public inbox for pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
To: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Subject: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 1/2] backup/datastore: refactor chunk inode sorting to the datastore
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 11:29:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210618092910.4518-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com> (raw)

so that we can reuse that information

the removal of the adding to the corrupted list is ok, since
'get_chunks_in_order' returns them at the end of the list
and we do the same if the loading fails later in 'verify_index_chunks'
so we still mark them corrupt
(assuming that the load will fail if the stat does)

Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
---
alternatively, we could return 2 lists, or check after the loop
for the u64::MAX value, but imho it's ok this way

 src/backup/datastore.rs | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 src/backup/verify.rs    | 38 +++++++-------------------------------
 2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backup/datastore.rs b/src/backup/datastore.rs
index a0cf50b2..116d2441 100644
--- a/src/backup/datastore.rs
+++ b/src/backup/datastore.rs
@@ -825,4 +825,42 @@ impl DataStore {
     pub fn verify_new(&self) -> bool {
         self.verify_new
     }
+
+    /// returns a list of chunks sorted by their inode number on disk
+    /// chunks that could not be stat'ed are at the end of the list
+    pub fn get_chunks_in_order<F, A>(
+        &self,
+        index: &Box<dyn IndexFile + Send>,
+        skip_chunk: F,
+        check_abort: A,
+    ) -> Result<Vec<(usize, u64)>, Error>
+    where
+        F: Fn(&[u8; 32]) -> bool,
+        A: Fn(usize) -> Result<(), Error>,
+    {
+        let index_count = index.index_count();
+        let mut chunk_list = Vec::with_capacity(index_count);
+        use std::os::unix::fs::MetadataExt;
+        for pos in 0..index_count {
+            check_abort(pos)?;
+
+            let info = index.chunk_info(pos).unwrap();
+
+            if skip_chunk(&info.digest) {
+                continue;
+            }
+
+            let ino = match self.stat_chunk(&info.digest) {
+                Err(_) => u64::MAX, // could not stat, move to end of list
+                Ok(metadata) => metadata.ino(),
+            };
+
+            chunk_list.push((pos, ino));
+        }
+
+        // sorting by inode improves data locality, which makes it lots faster on spinners
+        chunk_list.sort_unstable_by(|(_, ino_a), (_, ino_b)| ino_a.cmp(&ino_b));
+
+        Ok(chunk_list)
+    }
 }
diff --git a/src/backup/verify.rs b/src/backup/verify.rs
index a1b1e6dd..74b0cfe7 100644
--- a/src/backup/verify.rs
+++ b/src/backup/verify.rs
@@ -179,42 +179,18 @@ fn verify_index_chunks(
         }
     };
 
-    let index_count = index.index_count();
-    let mut chunk_list = Vec::with_capacity(index_count);
-
-    use std::os::unix::fs::MetadataExt;
-
-    for pos in 0..index_count {
+    let check_abort = |pos: usize| -> Result<(), Error> {
         if pos & 1023 == 0 {
             verify_worker.worker.check_abort()?;
             crate::tools::fail_on_shutdown()?;
         }
+        Ok(())
+    };
 
-        let info = index.chunk_info(pos).unwrap();
-
-        if skip_chunk(&info.digest) {
-            continue; // already verified or marked corrupt
-        }
-
-        match verify_worker.datastore.stat_chunk(&info.digest) {
-            Err(err) => {
-                verify_worker.corrupt_chunks.lock().unwrap().insert(info.digest);
-                task_log!(verify_worker.worker, "can't verify chunk, stat failed - {}", err);
-                errors.fetch_add(1, Ordering::SeqCst);
-                rename_corrupted_chunk(
-                    verify_worker.datastore.clone(),
-                    &info.digest,
-                    &verify_worker.worker,
-                );
-            }
-            Ok(metadata) => {
-                chunk_list.push((pos, metadata.ino()));
-            }
-        }
-    }
-
-    // sorting by inode improves data locality, which makes it lots faster on spinners
-    chunk_list.sort_unstable_by(|(_, ino_a), (_, ino_b)| ino_a.cmp(&ino_b));
+    let chunk_list =
+        verify_worker
+            .datastore
+            .get_chunks_in_order(&index, skip_chunk, check_abort)?;
 
     for (pos, _) in chunk_list {
         verify_worker.worker.check_abort()?;
-- 
2.20.1





             reply	other threads:[~2021-06-18  9:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-18  9:29 Dominik Csapak [this message]
2021-06-18  9:29 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 2/2] tape/helpers/snapshot_reader: sort chunks by inode (per index) Dominik Csapak
2021-06-18 15:02   ` Thomas Lamprecht
2021-07-12  4:23 ` [pbs-devel] applied-series: [PATCH proxmox-backup 1/2] backup/datastore: refactor chunk inode sorting to the datastore Thomas Lamprecht

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210618092910.4518-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com \
    --to=d.csapak@proxmox.com \
    --cc=pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Service provided by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH | Privacy | Legal