* [pbs-devel] [PATCH backup] backup: index readers: drop useless shared lock
@ 2020-10-09 10:45 Thomas Lamprecht
2020-10-09 10:59 ` [pbs-devel] applied: " Dietmar Maurer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Lamprecht @ 2020-10-09 10:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pbs-devel
This is only acquired in those two methods, both as shared. So it has
no use.
It seems, that it was planned in the past that the index deletion
should take the exclusive, while read and write takes the shared
flock on the index, as one can guess from the lock comments in commit
046521895307aa8bde8bab7ea3ef9e437d5ab5e5
But then later, in commit c8ec450e379f54e7ac648b3a3ff701b37e9a6620)
the documented semantics where changed to use a temp file and do an
atomic rename instead for atomicity.
The reader shared flock on the index file was done inbetween,
probably as preparatory step, but was not removed again when strategy
was changed to using the file rename instead.
Do so now, to avoid confusion of readers and a useless flock.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
---
src/backup/dynamic_index.rs | 6 ------
src/backup/fixed_index.rs | 6 ------
2 files changed, 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/backup/dynamic_index.rs b/src/backup/dynamic_index.rs
index 1cc4e53b..8731a418 100644
--- a/src/backup/dynamic_index.rs
+++ b/src/backup/dynamic_index.rs
@@ -90,12 +90,6 @@ impl DynamicIndexReader {
}
pub fn new(mut file: std::fs::File) -> Result<Self, Error> {
- if let Err(err) =
- nix::fcntl::flock(file.as_raw_fd(), nix::fcntl::FlockArg::LockSharedNonblock)
- {
- bail!("unable to get shared lock - {}", err);
- }
-
// FIXME: This is NOT OUR job! Check the callers of this method and remove this!
file.seek(SeekFrom::Start(0))?;
diff --git a/src/backup/fixed_index.rs b/src/backup/fixed_index.rs
index a2317f0b..eff50055 100644
--- a/src/backup/fixed_index.rs
+++ b/src/backup/fixed_index.rs
@@ -65,12 +65,6 @@ impl FixedIndexReader {
}
pub fn new(mut file: std::fs::File) -> Result<Self, Error> {
- if let Err(err) =
- nix::fcntl::flock(file.as_raw_fd(), nix::fcntl::FlockArg::LockSharedNonblock)
- {
- bail!("unable to get shared lock - {}", err);
- }
-
file.seek(SeekFrom::Start(0))?;
let header_size = std::mem::size_of::<FixedIndexHeader>();
--
2.27.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [pbs-devel] applied: [PATCH backup] backup: index readers: drop useless shared lock
2020-10-09 10:45 [pbs-devel] [PATCH backup] backup: index readers: drop useless shared lock Thomas Lamprecht
@ 2020-10-09 10:59 ` Dietmar Maurer
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dietmar Maurer @ 2020-10-09 10:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion, Thomas Lamprecht
applied
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-10-09 11:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-10-09 10:45 [pbs-devel] [PATCH backup] backup: index readers: drop useless shared lock Thomas Lamprecht
2020-10-09 10:59 ` [pbs-devel] applied: " Dietmar Maurer
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox