From: "Fabian Grünbichler" <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
To: Christian Ebner <c.ebner@proxmox.com>, pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH proxmox-backup] api: backup: cleanup backup group created by benchmark
Date: Mon, 04 May 2026 10:24:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1777881516.a5cvx4evyt.astroid@yuna.none> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260430135931.722979-1-c.ebner@proxmox.com>
On April 30, 2026 3:59 pm, Christian Ebner wrote:
> The benchmark creates it's own backup group host/benchmark, failed
> however to auto-cleanup the group after itself, because since commit
> 23be00a42 ("fix #3336: datastore: remove group if the last snapshot
> is removed"), cleanup requires an exclusive lock on the backup group
> for destroying it. The backup environment however already holds the
> exclusive lock to disallow concurrent backups to the same group.
>
> To fix this, drop the locks held in the backup environment by
> dropping the environment itself and rely on the cleanup to reacquire
> them again.
>
> Fixes: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/183138/
> Signed-off-by: Christian Ebner <c.ebner@proxmox.com>
> ---
> src/api2/backup/mod.rs | 11 ++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/api2/backup/mod.rs b/src/api2/backup/mod.rs
> index 86ec49487..8848ca99c 100644
> --- a/src/api2/backup/mod.rs
> +++ b/src/api2/backup/mod.rs
> @@ -288,9 +288,14 @@ fn upgrade_to_backup_protocol(
> if benchmark {
> env.log("benchmark finished successfully");
> proxmox_async::runtime::block_in_place(|| {
> - env.datastore.remove_backup_dir(
> - env.backup_dir.backup_ns(),
> - env.backup_dir.as_ref(),
> + let datastore = env.datastore.clone();
> + let namespace = env.backup_dir.backup_ns().clone();
> + let snapshot = env.backup_dir.dir().clone();
> + // draps all locks
nit: `draps` ;)
> + drop(env);
> + datastore.remove_backup_dir(
> + &namespace,
> + &snapshot,
> true,
> )
doesn't this also affect the "cleanup-on-error" paths a few lines below
this?
dropping the full env is also a bit problematic because it opens up a
race condition if there are back-to-back benchmarks (or backups):
- benchmark starts
- benchmark is finished, drops env
- next benchmark starts and locks group and previous "snapshot"
- cleanup fails to obtain lock(s) and doesn't run
for benchmarks that is not so bad, but for backups it would leave
half-written backup snapshots around (until they are cleaned up by other
means?).
ideally, we would not drop the locks here but just run the cleanup using
the locks we already have, which is what "force" is doing.
we currently only set force
- for the three calls here in the backup env
- when cleaning up a newly created snapshot as part of pull error
handling
in all those case we are holding an exclusive lock on the group and on
the snapshot already. so we could just skip the group locking as well
when force is set? (ideally we'd find a way to actually encode this in
the signature, e.g. by replacing `force` with references to the lock
guards?)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-04 8:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-30 13:59 [PATCH proxmox-backup] api: backup: cleanup backup group created by benchmark Christian Ebner
2026-05-04 8:24 ` Fabian Grünbichler [this message]
2026-05-04 19:22 ` Thomas Lamprecht
2026-05-04 18:03 ` applied: " Thomas Lamprecht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1777881516.a5cvx4evyt.astroid@yuna.none \
--to=f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com \
--cc=c.ebner@proxmox.com \
--cc=pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox