From: "Fabian Grünbichler" <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
<pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [RFC proxmox{, -backup} 0/6] add support for configuring max
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2025 11:45:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1762511147.2rj3dlqxrp.astroid@yuna.none> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250904143735.125857-1-h.laimer@proxmox.com>
On September 4, 2025 4:37 pm, Hannes Laimer wrote:
> This uses POSIX semaphores to control how many backups run at any given
> time. Semaphores seemed like a fitting choice given the problem, so I
> added a basic wrapper for named ones to proxmox-sys. Also, the changes
> needed to add concurrency limits in PBS were minimal.
>
> A few questions I still have and would be great to get some feedback on,
> - do we want to use semaphores like proposed here? Are there any good
> reasons not to?
they are rather primitive, and their file based nature means extra care
is required to not accidentally reset or mishandle them. reconfiguring
is also a bit of a pain, as you need to know the old value for certain
to do so..
we already have shared memory based synchronization mechanisms in our
Rust code, which would give us a lot more features.. e.g., allow things
like registering queued backup sessions if there are no slots available,
and notifying the oldest one if a slot becomes available.. this is
currently used by the config version cache and the rate limiting code.
or if we want to keep it really primitive, we already have a file-based
operations tracking that we could extend, although that would probably
require quite a bit of refactoring to make sense, since we currently do
a lookup/write-operation registration as part of the backup session
opening/connection upgrade..
> - should we include things like verify/gc/prune? Would an extra sem for
> reading make sense(so separate limits for r and w, idk if there's a
> use-case)?
>
> Nothing UI-wise is included, and for changes to apply the proxy has to
> be restarted. Not sure if restarting the proxy is "ok-ish" ux wise, I
> guess not :P But changing it involves re-creating the semaphore, which
> is fine, just that there won't exist one for a really short time...
what about reloading? we might still have sessions running in the old
worker that are now no longer accounted for?
>
>
> proxmox:
>
> Hannes Laimer (2):
> sys: add wrapper for POSIX semaphores
> pbs-api-types: add concurrency_limit to DataStoreConfig
>
> pbs-api-types/src/datastore.rs | 5 +
> proxmox-sys/Cargo.toml | 1 +
> proxmox-sys/src/lib.rs | 2 +
> proxmox-sys/src/semaphore.rs | 164 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 172 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 proxmox-sys/src/semaphore.rs
>
>
> proxmox-backup:
>
> Hannes Laimer (4):
> api: config: update/delete concurrency_limit on datastore
> Cargo.toml: add 'semaphore' feature to proxmox-sys dep
> bin: proxy: initialize concurrency semaphores for datastores
> api: backup: wait for semaphore if one exists
>
> Cargo.toml | 2 +-
> src/api2/backup/mod.rs | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
> src/api2/config/datastore.rs | 9 +++++++++
> src/bin/proxmox-backup-proxy.rs | 11 +++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
>
> Summary over all repositories:
> 8 files changed, 215 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> --
> Generated by git-murpp 0.8.1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pbs-devel mailing list
> pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
pbs-devel mailing list
pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-07 10:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-04 14:37 Hannes Laimer
2025-09-04 14:37 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox 1/2] sys: add wrapper for POSIX semaphores Hannes Laimer
2025-09-04 14:37 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox 2/2] pbs-api-types: add concurrency_limit to DataStoreConfig Hannes Laimer
2025-09-04 14:37 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 1/4] api: config: update/delete concurrency_limit on datastore Hannes Laimer
2025-09-04 14:37 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 2/4] Cargo.toml: add 'semaphore' feature to proxmox-sys dep Hannes Laimer
2025-09-04 14:37 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 3/4] bin: proxy: initialize concurrency semaphores for datastores Hannes Laimer
2025-09-04 14:37 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 4/4] api: backup: wait for semaphore if one exists Hannes Laimer
2025-11-06 9:41 ` [pbs-devel] [RFC proxmox{, -backup} 0/6] add support for configuring max Hannes Laimer
2025-11-07 10:45 ` Fabian Grünbichler [this message]
2025-11-07 13:28 ` Hannes Laimer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1762511147.2rj3dlqxrp.astroid@yuna.none \
--to=f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com \
--cc=pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox