* [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup] client: catalog shell: avoid navigating below archive root @ 2024-07-22 10:07 Christian Ebner 2024-08-07 8:25 ` Fabian Grünbichler 2024-08-08 11:44 ` Christian Ebner 0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Christian Ebner @ 2024-07-22 10:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: pbs-devel Avoid to underflow the catalogs shell position stack by navigating below the archives root directory into the catalog root. Otherwise the shell will panic, as the root entry is always expected to be present. Signed-off-by: Christian Ebner <c.ebner@proxmox.com> --- Encountered while implementing the catalog shell for the split pxar archive case. Without this additional check, a `cd ..` in the pxar archive root of the catalog shell will panic. pbs-client/src/catalog_shell.rs | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/pbs-client/src/catalog_shell.rs b/pbs-client/src/catalog_shell.rs index 349bb7cbc..88045db5d 100644 --- a/pbs-client/src/catalog_shell.rs +++ b/pbs-client/src/catalog_shell.rs @@ -720,6 +720,12 @@ impl Shell { &mut None, ) .await?; + + if new_position.len() < 1 { + // Avoid moving below archive root into catalog root + return Ok(()); + } + if !new_position.last().unwrap().catalog.is_directory() { bail!("not a directory"); } -- 2.39.2 _______________________________________________ pbs-devel mailing list pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup] client: catalog shell: avoid navigating below archive root 2024-07-22 10:07 [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup] client: catalog shell: avoid navigating below archive root Christian Ebner @ 2024-08-07 8:25 ` Fabian Grünbichler 2024-08-07 10:54 ` Christian Ebner 2024-08-08 11:44 ` Christian Ebner 1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Fabian Grünbichler @ 2024-08-07 8:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christian Ebner, pbs-devel Quoting Christian Ebner (2024-07-22 12:07:05) > Avoid to underflow the catalogs shell position stack by navigating > below the archives root directory into the catalog root. Otherwise > the shell will panic, as the root entry is always expected to be > present. > > Signed-off-by: Christian Ebner <c.ebner@proxmox.com> > --- > Encountered while implementing the catalog shell for the split pxar > archive case. > > Without this additional check, a `cd ..` in the pxar archive root of > the catalog shell will panic. > > pbs-client/src/catalog_shell.rs | 6 ++++++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/pbs-client/src/catalog_shell.rs b/pbs-client/src/catalog_shell.rs > index 349bb7cbc..88045db5d 100644 > --- a/pbs-client/src/catalog_shell.rs > +++ b/pbs-client/src/catalog_shell.rs > @@ -720,6 +720,12 @@ impl Shell { > &mut None, > ) > .await?; > + > + if new_position.len() < 1 { > + // Avoid moving below archive root into catalog root > + return Ok(()); > + } since new_position is a Vec, wouldn't `new_position.is_empty()` be the right fit? should this print a warning? I guess since regular shells pretend `/` is the parent of `/`, we can do the same here? > + > if !new_position.last().unwrap().catalog.is_directory() { > bail!("not a directory"); > } > -- > 2.39.2 > > > > _______________________________________________ > pbs-devel mailing list > pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel > > _______________________________________________ pbs-devel mailing list pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup] client: catalog shell: avoid navigating below archive root 2024-08-07 8:25 ` Fabian Grünbichler @ 2024-08-07 10:54 ` Christian Ebner 2024-08-07 11:24 ` Fabian Grünbichler 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Christian Ebner @ 2024-08-07 10:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fabian Grünbichler, pbs-devel On 8/7/24 10:25, Fabian Grünbichler wrote: > Quoting Christian Ebner (2024-07-22 12:07:05) >> Avoid to underflow the catalogs shell position stack by navigating >> below the archives root directory into the catalog root. Otherwise >> the shell will panic, as the root entry is always expected to be >> present. >> >> Signed-off-by: Christian Ebner <c.ebner@proxmox.com> >> --- >> Encountered while implementing the catalog shell for the split pxar >> archive case. >> >> Without this additional check, a `cd ..` in the pxar archive root of >> the catalog shell will panic. >> >> pbs-client/src/catalog_shell.rs | 6 ++++++ >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/pbs-client/src/catalog_shell.rs b/pbs-client/src/catalog_shell.rs >> index 349bb7cbc..88045db5d 100644 >> --- a/pbs-client/src/catalog_shell.rs >> +++ b/pbs-client/src/catalog_shell.rs >> @@ -720,6 +720,12 @@ impl Shell { >> &mut None, >> ) >> .await?; >> + >> + if new_position.len() < 1 { >> + // Avoid moving below archive root into catalog root >> + return Ok(()); >> + } > > since new_position is a Vec, wouldn't `new_position.is_empty()` be the right > fit? Yes, this is even a clippy warning I overlooked, will send a new version for this. > > should this print a warning? I guess since regular shells pretend `/` is the > parent of `/`, we can do the same here? I'm not sure a warning would bring much benefit here, unless we plan to allow to navigate the whole catalog at some point, not just the archive given as parameter when invoking the shell. Also, could you clarify what do you mean exactly with the latter question. With the patch applied the shell should treat '/' as parent of itself, or am I missing something. _______________________________________________ pbs-devel mailing list pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup] client: catalog shell: avoid navigating below archive root 2024-08-07 10:54 ` Christian Ebner @ 2024-08-07 11:24 ` Fabian Grünbichler 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Fabian Grünbichler @ 2024-08-07 11:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christian Ebner, pbs-devel > Christian Ebner <c.ebner@proxmox.com> hat am 07.08.2024 12:54 CEST geschrieben: > > > On 8/7/24 10:25, Fabian Grünbichler wrote: > > Quoting Christian Ebner (2024-07-22 12:07:05) > >> Avoid to underflow the catalogs shell position stack by navigating > >> below the archives root directory into the catalog root. Otherwise > >> the shell will panic, as the root entry is always expected to be > >> present. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Christian Ebner <c.ebner@proxmox.com> > >> --- > >> Encountered while implementing the catalog shell for the split pxar > >> archive case. > >> > >> Without this additional check, a `cd ..` in the pxar archive root of > >> the catalog shell will panic. > >> > >> pbs-client/src/catalog_shell.rs | 6 ++++++ > >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/pbs-client/src/catalog_shell.rs b/pbs-client/src/catalog_shell.rs > >> index 349bb7cbc..88045db5d 100644 > >> --- a/pbs-client/src/catalog_shell.rs > >> +++ b/pbs-client/src/catalog_shell.rs > >> @@ -720,6 +720,12 @@ impl Shell { > >> &mut None, > >> ) > >> .await?; > >> + > >> + if new_position.len() < 1 { > >> + // Avoid moving below archive root into catalog root > >> + return Ok(()); > >> + } > > > > since new_position is a Vec, wouldn't `new_position.is_empty()` be the right > > fit? > > Yes, this is even a clippy warning I overlooked, will send a new version > for this. > > > > > should this print a warning? I guess since regular shells pretend `/` is the > > parent of `/`, we can do the same here? > > I'm not sure a warning would bring much benefit here, unless we plan to > allow to navigate the whole catalog at some point, not just the archive > given as parameter when invoking the shell. > > Also, could you clarify what do you mean exactly with the latter > question. With the patch applied the shell should treat '/' as parent of > itself, or am I missing something. sorry, yes, that was not phrased clearly. I just wanted to make sure that this is intentional, and "shell" was referring to a regular shell not our catalog shell. as in - is it intentional that this is silent (like it is in regular shells when doing "cd .." while already being in "/"), or do we want to have a warning there? _______________________________________________ pbs-devel mailing list pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup] client: catalog shell: avoid navigating below archive root 2024-07-22 10:07 [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup] client: catalog shell: avoid navigating below archive root Christian Ebner 2024-08-07 8:25 ` Fabian Grünbichler @ 2024-08-08 11:44 ` Christian Ebner 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Christian Ebner @ 2024-08-08 11:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: pbs-devel superseded-by version 2: https://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/2024-August/010479.html _______________________________________________ pbs-devel mailing list pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-08-08 11:44 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2024-07-22 10:07 [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup] client: catalog shell: avoid navigating below archive root Christian Ebner 2024-08-07 8:25 ` Fabian Grünbichler 2024-08-07 10:54 ` Christian Ebner 2024-08-07 11:24 ` Fabian Grünbichler 2024-08-08 11:44 ` Christian Ebner
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox