public inbox for pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
	<pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
	Stefan Reiter <s.reiter@proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 1/5] backup: don't validate chunk existance if base was recently verified
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 15:32:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <102da918-162c-fcf4-f1e7-68b46b63f953@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200930132522.22927-2-s.reiter@proxmox.com>

On 30.09.20 15:25, Stefan Reiter wrote:
> If the base was successfully verified within the last 7 days, we assume
> that it is okay and all chunks exist, so we don't have to check.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Reiter <s.reiter@proxmox.com>
> ---
>  src/api2/backup/environment.rs | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/src/api2/backup/environment.rs b/src/api2/backup/environment.rs
> index d515bf30..be06d1dc 100644
> --- a/src/api2/backup/environment.rs
> +++ b/src/api2/backup/environment.rs
> @@ -457,6 +457,31 @@ impl BackupEnvironment {
>          Ok(())
>      }
>  
> +    fn last_backup_has_recent_verify(&self) -> Result<bool, Error> {
> +        match &self.last_backup {
> +            Some(last_backup) => {
> +                let last_dir = &last_backup.backup_dir;
> +                let (manifest, _) = self.datastore.load_manifest(last_dir)?;
> +                let verify = manifest.unprotected["verify_state"].clone();
> +                match serde_json::from_value::<Option<SnapshotVerifyState>>(verify) {
> +                    Ok(verify) => match verify {
> +                        Some(verify) => {
> +                            let cutoff = unsafe { libc::time(std::ptr::null_mut()) };
> +                            let cutoff = cutoff - 60*60*24*7; // one week back

Why unsafe and why not our `proxmox::tools::time::epoch_i64()` ?


on another note: we should probably add some helper for getting the
verify state

> +                            Ok(verify.state == VerifyState::Ok && verify.upid.starttime > cutoff)
> +                        },
> +                        None => Ok(false)
> +                    },
> +                    Err(err) => {
> +                        self.worker.warn(format!("error parsing base verification state : '{}'", err));
> +                        Ok(false)
> +                    }
> +                }
> +            },
> +            None => Ok(false)
> +        }
> +    }
> +
>      /// Ensure all chunks referenced in this backup actually exist.
>      /// Only call *after* all writers have been closed, to avoid race with GC.
>      /// In case of error, mark the previous backup as 'verify failed'.
> @@ -534,7 +559,9 @@ impl BackupEnvironment {
>              }
>          }
>  
> -        self.verify_chunk_existance(&state.known_chunks)?;
> +        if !self.last_backup_has_recent_verify()? {
> +            self.verify_chunk_existance(&state.known_chunks)?;
> +        }
>  
>          // marks the backup as successful
>          state.finished = true;
> 






  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-30 13:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-30 13:25 [pbs-devel] [PATCH 0/5] backup validation improvements Stefan Reiter
2020-09-30 13:25 ` [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup 1/5] backup: don't validate chunk existance if base was recently verified Stefan Reiter
2020-09-30 13:32   ` Thomas Lamprecht [this message]
2020-09-30 13:42     ` Stefan Reiter
2020-09-30 13:55       ` Thomas Lamprecht
2020-09-30 13:25 ` [pbs-devel] [RFC proxmox-backup 2/5] ParallelHandler: add unbounded mode Stefan Reiter
2020-09-30 13:25 ` [pbs-devel] [RFC proxmox-backup 3/5] ParallelHandler: add check_abort function and handle errors during join Stefan Reiter
2020-09-30 13:25 ` [pbs-devel] [RFC proxmox-backup 4/5] ParallelHandler: exit early if this or other thread aborted Stefan Reiter
2020-09-30 13:25 ` [pbs-devel] [RFC proxmox-backup 5/5] backup: validate chunk existance in background Stefan Reiter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=102da918-162c-fcf4-f1e7-68b46b63f953@proxmox.com \
    --to=t.lamprecht@proxmox.com \
    --cc=pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
    --cc=s.reiter@proxmox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Service provided by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH | Privacy | Legal