From: Gabriel Goller <g.goller@proxmox.com>
To: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>,
Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
<pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [RFC proxmox-backup 0/2] Tasklog rewrite with tracing
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 11:09:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0fd77836-896a-4017-9300-b74be824f346@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4e0de017-9fbf-4a5e-b735-62b955fe8a8b@proxmox.com>
On 10/18/23 15:12, Dominik Csapak wrote:
> hi, a high level comments on this series:
>
> you implemented a 'tasklog' = true filter, which is nice, but not
> filter for the syslog
> in general we'd want to land things either in the task log (preferred)
> or in the syslog,
> not in both (e.g. for some tasks this pollutes the syslog unnecessarily)
>
Ok, this should be easy, we just check in the `syslog_layer` if the
`task_log` attribute
is None in the Metadata. Like this we only log to task_log OR syslog.
> so i'd like to see also a syslog = false (or syslog = true) and maybe
> some
> functionality to enable/disable that for whole block (if that's even
> possible?)
As mentioned in the other patch, currently we can't inspect metadata
values when enabling/
disabling a layer :/ .
What do you mean exactly by 'disabling in a whole block'?
We could enable/disable the filelog layer in specific rust modules (not
so useful for us)
or e.g, create a span on thread/task creation and then let all the logs
in that span go to
the task_log? The problem with that is that we would have to create an
specific attribute
to log to syslog while we are in a worker_task context (e.g.
`info!(syslog = true, "to syslog")`)
and it's not so clear anymore where we write (i.e. I'd have to look at
the context to know
if a `log::info!()` call writes to task_log or syslog).
IMO having a explicit `tasklog` attribute on every event is good (The
name is obviously debatable,
we could choose something shorter, or create a macro `task_info!` to
make it easier to use).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-23 9:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-11 14:01 Gabriel Goller
2023-10-11 14:01 ` [pbs-devel] [RFC proxmox-backup 1/2] log: removed task_log! macro and moved to tracing Gabriel Goller
2023-10-11 14:01 ` [pbs-devel] [RFC proxmox 2/2] proxmox-log: added tracing infra Gabriel Goller
2023-10-13 12:36 ` Gabriel Goller
2023-10-18 13:26 ` Dominik Csapak
2023-10-23 8:56 ` Gabriel Goller
2023-10-23 9:11 ` Gabriel Goller
2023-10-18 13:12 ` [pbs-devel] [RFC proxmox-backup 0/2] Tasklog rewrite with tracing Dominik Csapak
2023-10-23 9:09 ` Gabriel Goller [this message]
2023-10-23 9:29 ` Dominik Csapak
2023-10-23 11:43 ` Gabriel Goller
2023-10-23 14:33 ` Thomas Lamprecht
2023-10-24 13:44 ` Gabriel Goller
2023-10-25 13:55 ` Gabriel Goller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0fd77836-896a-4017-9300-b74be824f346@proxmox.com \
--to=g.goller@proxmox.com \
--cc=d.csapak@proxmox.com \
--cc=pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox