public inbox for pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
To: Dietmar Maurer <dietmar@proxmox.com>,
	Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
	<pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup] api2/tape/backup: wait indefinitely for lock in scheduled backup jobs
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 10:25:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <02dea46e-870d-a3b8-fa72-d7e5bca5a7ee@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1769832677.243.1616046831798@webmail.proxmox.com>

On 3/18/21 06:53, Dietmar Maurer wrote:
>> -    // early check/lock before starting worker
>> -    let drive_lock = lock_tape_device(&drive_config, &setup.drive)?;
>> +    // for scheduled jobs we acquire the lock later in the worker
>> +    let drive_lock = if schedule.is_some() {
>> +        None
>> +    } else {
>> +        Some(lock_tape_device(&drive_config, &setup.drive)?)
>> +    };
> 
> What is the reason for the different locking times? Can't we always lock
> later in the worker?
> 

yes we can, but for the non-scheduled backup, we only have one try
to lock and i did not want to start a task since that would generate
a task entry that was preventable by checking beforehand

On 3/18/21 07:04, Dietmar Maurer wrote:
 >
 >> +            let (job_result, summary) = match try_block!({
 >> +                if schedule.is_some() {
 >> +                    // for scheduled tape backup jobs, we wait 
indefinitely for the lock
 >> +                    task_log!(worker, "waiting for drive lock...");
 >> +                    loop {
 >> +                        if let Ok(lock) = 
lock_tape_device(&drive_config, &setup.drive) {
 >> +                            drive_lock = Some(lock);
 >> +                            break;
 >> +                        } // ignore errors
 >
 > I would prefer to add a timeout parameter to lock_tape_device() call.
 > The question is if the lock call gets interrupted by task abort?

i did it this way, because an abort would not trigger if we are just 
waiting on a lock, so i decided to try the lock in a loop with
the check_abort()? call below (so one can abort this)

we could ofc add a timeout parameter, but would not change
the code here (and currently has no real upside, since
we probably would not use different timeouts anyway?)

 >
 >> +
 >> +                        worker.check_abort()?;
 >> +                    }
 >> +                }
 >> +                set_tape_device_state(&setup.drive, 
&worker.upid().to_string())?;




  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-18  9:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-17 13:38 Dominik Csapak
2021-03-18  5:53 ` Dietmar Maurer
2021-03-18  9:25   ` Dominik Csapak [this message]
2021-03-18  6:04 ` Dietmar Maurer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=02dea46e-870d-a3b8-fa72-d7e5bca5a7ee@proxmox.com \
    --to=d.csapak@proxmox.com \
    --cc=dietmar@proxmox.com \
    --cc=pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Service provided by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH | Privacy | Legal