From: Andrei Perapiolkin via pve-devel <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Cc: Andrei Perapiolkin <andrei.perepiolkin@open-e.com>
Subject: [pve-devel] Handling 'path' requests during VM deletion
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2025 17:34:02 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mailman.714.1754602793.367.pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 7000 bytes --]
From: Andrei Perapiolkin <andrei.perepiolkin@open-e.com>
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Subject: [pve-devel] Handling 'path' requests during VM deletion
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2025 17:34:02 -0400
Message-ID: <ec1c3036-4783-4c3a-baf0-a32d883dc852@open-e.com>
Hi,
VM deletion retries 'path'/'free_image' for already-removed volumes;
expected plugin behavior on missing volumes is unclear.
When deleting a VM with multiple attached volumes, Proxmox deletes
volumes sequentially (one at a time) and
updates the VM record only after all deletions complete.
If a volume deletion fails mid-process (e.g., network error), the VM
record is not updated even though some volumes may have been
successfully removed.
A subsequent delete attempt repeats all operations, including 'path'
(and 'free_image') calls for volumes that were already deleted.
What is the proper response to 'path' and 'free_image' calls for a
volume that no longer exists?
For path, should the call fail (e.g., 'die'), succeed with an empty
string, or return a 'storage path'?
Tested on Proxmox VE 8.4.0
Best regards,
Andrei Perepiolkin
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
next reply other threads:[~2025-08-07 21:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-07 21:34 Andrei Perapiolkin via pve-devel [this message]
2025-08-14 15:11 ` Fiona Ebner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=mailman.714.1754602793.367.pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
--to=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
--cc=andrei.perepiolkin@open-e.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.