From: Andrei Perapiolkin via pve-devel <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Cc: Andrei Perapiolkin <andrei.perepiolkin@open-e.com>
Subject: [pve-devel] [storage] Lack of deactivate_volume call after cloning from a snapshot
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2025 18:39:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mailman.534.1759272790.390.pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 8933 bytes --]
From: Andrei Perapiolkin <andrei.perepiolkin@open-e.com>
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Subject: [pve-devel][storage] Lack of deactivate_volume call after cloning from a snapshot
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2025 18:39:32 -0400
Message-ID: <5e0aef43-3698-4784-8ca3-448eb3f19709@open-e.com>
Hi,
'deactivate_volume' in the storage plugin is not called after cloning
completes if the clone is initiated from the Proxmox web UI and both VMs
are on the same host.
I’ve created a bug report: https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6879
In my understanding, the problem is related to:
/method({ name => 'clone_vm', path => '{vmid}/clone', ...
/
Located in PVE/API2/Qemu.pm around 1459 - 4568
In this API method, deactivation calls are triggered only when the
$target parameter is provided.
if ($target) {
if (!$running) {
# always deactivate volumes - avoids that LVM
LVs are active on several nodes
eval {
PVE::Storage::deactivate_volumes($storecfg, $vollist, $snapname);
};
# but only warn when that fails (e.g., parallel
clones keeping them active)
log_warn($@) if $@;
}
PVE::Storage::deactivate_volumes($storecfg,
$newvollist);
my $newconffile =
PVE::QemuConfig->config_file($newid, $target);
die "Failed to move config to node '$target' -
rename failed: $!\n"
if !rename($conffile, $newconffile);
}
https://github.com/proxmox/qemu-server/blob/31d6f5f63bd6edb6c43de3e0213d38199c350cd4/src/PVE/API2/Qemu.pm#L4533C1-L4547C18
It seems that web UI, for cloning on the same node, does not provide
'$target' and as a result no deactivation being triggered volume
snapshot and target volume.
Is it expected behavior?
Will it be OK to move 'deactivate' section outside of the $target check?
Best regards,
Andrei Perepiolkin
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
next reply other threads:[~2025-09-30 22:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-30 22:39 Andrei Perapiolkin via pve-devel [this message]
2025-10-03 10:16 ` Fabian Grünbichler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=mailman.534.1759272790.390.pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
--to=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
--cc=andrei.perepiolkin@open-e.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.