From: Daniel Krambrock via pve-devel <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Cc: Daniel Krambrock <krambrock@hrz.uni-marburg.de>
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] Continuing on making the VM ID suggestion strategy configurable
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 12:44:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mailman.510.1725274253.302.pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <tzwlxcv5z7qacnzkaggl6sz67xsg7cpcktyqc4rulh5nnxm7vy@dviin2xi67un>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 8018 bytes --]
From: Daniel Krambrock <krambrock@hrz.uni-marburg.de>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] Continuing on making the VM ID suggestion strategy configurable
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 12:44:44 +0200
Message-ID: <30ea0b15-3fe1-43d2-a573-e7d41504371a@hrz.uni-marburg.de>
Hi everyone,
please excuse me for leaving this issue lying around. I am very pleased
that Severen is interested in continuing this patch and takes over the work.
Am 30.08.24 um 01:08 schrieb Severen Redwood:
> There's a patch series [2] from a few months ago which addresses this by
> making the VM ID suggestion strategy configurable with the following
> options:
>
> 1. Use the smallest ID that is not currently in use (current behaviour).
> 2. Use one greater than the largest ID in use.
> 3. Use the smallest ID that is neither currently nor previously in use.
>
> In particular, option 3 is the one that would best solve the problem for
> me.
You are of course right, only option 3 solves the problem as also
Shannon pointed out.
> However, the patches are stuck on some unresolved feedback and the
> author (CC'd in) seems to have either paused or abandoned work on the
> feature. For this reason, I'm interested in picking up where they left
> off to get the feature to an acceptable state. Is this OK?
For me this is more then OK, thank you. In case it's still important: I
have already signed the Harmony CLA.
Yours sincerely,
Daniel
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
next parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-02 10:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <tzwlxcv5z7qacnzkaggl6sz67xsg7cpcktyqc4rulh5nnxm7vy@dviin2xi67un>
2024-09-02 10:44 ` Daniel Krambrock via pve-devel [this message]
2024-08-29 23:08 Severen Redwood via pve-devel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=mailman.510.1725274253.302.pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
--to=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
--cc=krambrock@hrz.uni-marburg.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.
Service provided by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH | Privacy | Legal