From: RolandK via pve-user <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
To: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
Cc: RolandK <devzero@web.de>
Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Dell PowerEdge T140, megaraid, BIOS Boot...
Date: Fri, 2 May 2025 19:03:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mailman.176.1746205698.394.pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <vf4fel-i3o2.ln1@leia.lilliput.linux.it>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 10933 bytes --]
From: RolandK <devzero@web.de>
To: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Dell PowerEdge T140, megaraid, BIOS Boot...
Date: Fri, 2 May 2025 19:03:01 +0200
Message-ID: <b7165214-1db9-46a8-8d9d-2e8cb5cd1c6c@web.de>
hello,
there is a note at https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Roadmap#Proxmox_VE_8.2
Kernel: |intel_iommu| now defaults to on
The |intel_iommu| parameter defaults to |on| in the kernel 6.8 series.
Enabling IOMMU can cause problems with older hardware, or systems with
not up to date BIOS, due to bugs in the BIOS.
The issue can be fixed by explicitly disabling |intel_iommu| on the
kernel commandline (|intel_iommu=off|) following the reference
documentation
<https://pve.proxmox.com/pve-docs/chapter-sysadmin.html#sysboot_edit_kernel_cmdline>.
does intel_iommu=off also help ?
regards
Roland
Am 02.05.25 um 17:21 schrieb Marco Gaiarin:
> I've just upgraded to PVE8 a little cluster built with an PowerEdge T340
> (boot in UEFI mode) and an T140 (boot in BIOS mode).
>
> T340 works like a charme; T140 after rebooting panicked because cannot find
> root filesystem; looking carefully at kernel log revealed that disks get not
> recognized, and going deeper lead me to:
>
> gaio@leia:~$ grep megaraid T140_boot_log.txt
> [ 31.952470] megaraid_sas 0000:01:00.0: FW now in Ready state
> [ 31.952472] megaraid_sas 0000:01:00.0: 63 bit DMA mask and 32 bit consistent mask
> [ 31.952624] megaraid_sas 0000:01:00.0: firmware supports msix : (96)
> [ 31.952750] megaraid_sas 0000:01:00.0: requested/available msix 5/5 poll_queue 0
> [ 31.952752] megaraid_sas 0000:01:00.0: current msix/online cpus : (5/4)
> [ 31.952753] megaraid_sas 0000:01:00.0: RDPQ mode : (disabled)
> [ 31.952758] megaraid_sas 0000:01:00.0: Current firmware supports maximum commands: 928 LDIO threshold: 237
> [ 31.954076] megaraid_sas 0000:01:00.0: Performance mode :Latency (latency index = 1)
> [ 31.954078] megaraid_sas 0000:01:00.0: FW supports sync cache : No
> [ 31.954080] megaraid_sas 0000:01:00.0: megasas_disable_intr_fusion is called outbound_intr_mask:0x40000009
> [ 32.362294] megaraid_sas 0000:01:00.0: Ignore DCMD timeout: megasas_get_ctrl_info 5382
> [ 32.665126] megaraid_sas 0000:01:00.0: Could not get controller info. Fail from megasas_init_adapter_fusion 1907
> [ 32.908139] megaraid_sas 0000:01:00.0: Failed from megasas_init_fw 6539
>
> googling a bit lead me to some forum and pages; after some test i've added
> to kernel boot parameters:
>
> iommu=pt
>
> and now server boot flawlessy.
>
>
> The two servers have different hardware but share the same BIOS, so this
> lead to me to the hypotesis that the new megaraid_sas kernel driver depend
> on UEFI initialization to work, or something like this.
>
> Also, i've understood that 'pt' mean 'PassThrought', but i've not clear what
> overral consequences (performance, stability, ...) have this options.
>
>
> I'm seeking feedback. Thanks.
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 157 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-02 17:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-02 15:21 Marco Gaiarin
2025-05-02 17:03 ` RolandK via pve-user [this message]
[not found] ` <b7165214-1db9-46a8-8d9d-2e8cb5cd1c6c@web.de>
2025-05-14 20:38 ` Marco Gaiarin
2025-05-14 20:46 ` Arjen via pve-user
2025-05-16 13:43 ` Marco Gaiarin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=mailman.176.1746205698.394.pve-user@lists.proxmox.com \
--to=pve-user@lists.proxmox.com \
--cc=devzero@web.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.
Service provided by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH | Privacy | Legal