all lists on lists.proxmox.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfgang Bumiller <w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
To: "Fabian Grünbichler" <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
Cc: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Subject: Re: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup] mapped loop device: use read loop instead of read_exact
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2023 14:22:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <io2wan7ner6cxpc3i4apratcfrpjsl5rhsdqmfn2yk66y662xn@qqkgskjp5rrl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230629103213.1041236-1-f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>

On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 12:32:13PM +0200, Fabian Grünbichler wrote:
> since read_exact does not support short reads, which can easily happen if the
> mapped image's EOF is not aligned with the request size.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
> ---
> 
> Notes:
>     reported on the forum:
>     
>     https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/problem-backing-up-using-backup-client.129347
>     
>     did a quick test reading from a mapped image full of random data, observed
>     no performance difference..

Do you get one if we just drop the loop logic and *actually* just
`read()` once? IMO this is more in line with what a read syscall
*should* be doing.
Further, we use a `CachedChunkReader` under it which actually does a
read loop anyway, so AFAICT this *can't* make a difference.

> 
>  pbs-fuse-loop/src/fuse_loop.rs | 19 +++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/pbs-fuse-loop/src/fuse_loop.rs b/pbs-fuse-loop/src/fuse_loop.rs
> index 3d0ef123..7e780799 100644
> --- a/pbs-fuse-loop/src/fuse_loop.rs
> +++ b/pbs-fuse-loop/src/fuse_loop.rs
> @@ -188,13 +188,20 @@ impl<R: AsyncRead + AsyncSeek + Unpin> FuseLoopSession<R> {
>                              match self.reader.seek(SeekFrom::Start(req.offset)).await {
>                                  Ok(_) => {
>                                      let mut buf = vec![0u8; req.size];
> -                                    match self.reader.read_exact(&mut buf).await {
> -                                        Ok(_) => {
> -                                            req.reply(&buf)
> -                                        },
> -                                        Err(e) => {
> -                                            req.io_fail(e)
> +                                    let mut read = 0;
> +                                    let mut res = Ok(());
> +                                    while read < req.size && res.is_ok() {
> +                                        match self.reader.read(&mut buf).await {
> +                                            Ok(0) => { break; },
> +                                            Ok(n) => { read += n; },
> +                                            Err(e) => { res = Err(e); },
>                                          }
> +                                    };
> +                                    if let Err(e) = res {
> +                                        req.io_fail(e)
> +                                    } else {
> +                                        buf.truncate(read);
> +                                        req.reply(&buf)
>                                      }
>                                  },
>                                  Err(e) => {
> -- 
> 2.39.2




  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-11-27 13:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-29 10:32 Fabian Grünbichler
2023-06-29 11:03 ` Dominik Csapak
2023-06-29 11:35   ` Fabian Grünbichler
2023-06-29 11:46     ` Dominik Csapak
2023-11-27  9:53 ` Fabian Grünbichler
2023-11-27 13:22 ` Wolfgang Bumiller [this message]
2023-11-27 17:27   ` Fabian Grünbichler
2023-11-28 10:07     ` Wolfgang Bumiller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=io2wan7ner6cxpc3i4apratcfrpjsl5rhsdqmfn2yk66y662xn@qqkgskjp5rrl \
    --to=w.bumiller@proxmox.com \
    --cc=f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com \
    --cc=pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.
Service provided by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH | Privacy | Legal