From: Arthur Bied-Charreton <a.bied-charreton@proxmox.com>
To: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Cc: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-network 1/2] fix #7077: Improve error messages for ID length mismatch
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2026 09:23:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fgyjvqlrljjo2xnungujc32vtmntrkk7pegmxmtfvlsfsr6avb@j4dqylko37m4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b0e4fcd6-1c9a-43c1-a0c3-0dc517f107f5@proxmox.com>
On Thu, Jan 29, 2026 at 06:38:50PM +0100, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
> Am 21.01.26 um 11:34 schrieb Arthur Bied-Charreton:
> > Add explicit length checks to ID validation functions to provide clearer
> > error messages in case of length mismatches
>
> A few of these checks might be also done by setting the "maxLength" and/or the
> "minLength" property in the matching "register_standard_option" schema definition.
> Could you check that? Would be IMO better to reuse the schema capabillities, and
> that way, this limits would be also visible in the api schema directly.
>
>
Hey Thomas, thanks for the feedback, I did not think about that.
After looking into this, it seems like we could get rid of most of the parse_*_id functions
(and probably others as well), but this would require changing PVE::JSONSchema::check_format
to check in the following order:
`length -> pattern -> custom format fn`
as opposed to currently:
`custom format fn -> pattern -> length`
In the JSON Schema validation's current implementation, the length parameters are effectively ignored
due to the pattern/format function being checked beforehand. Do you see any issue with changing the
validation order?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-30 8:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-21 10:32 [pve-devel] [PATCH 0/5] fix #7077: Improve ID validation error messages Arthur Bied-Charreton
2026-01-21 10:32 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-common] fix #7077: Improve error message for IDs shorter than 2 characters Arthur Bied-Charreton
2026-01-21 18:00 ` [pve-devel] applied: " Thomas Lamprecht
2026-01-21 10:32 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-storage] fix #7077: Improve error message for IDS " Arthur Bied-Charreton
2026-01-21 10:32 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH proxmox] fix #7077: Improve error message for SDN IDs " Arthur Bied-Charreton
2026-01-21 10:32 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-network 1/2] fix #7077: Improve error messages for ID length mismatch Arthur Bied-Charreton
2026-01-29 17:38 ` Thomas Lamprecht
2026-01-30 8:23 ` Arthur Bied-Charreton [this message]
2026-01-21 10:32 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-network 2/2] fix #7077: Respect noerr flag in SDN ID validation Arthur Bied-Charreton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fgyjvqlrljjo2xnungujc32vtmntrkk7pegmxmtfvlsfsr6avb@j4dqylko37m4 \
--to=a.bied-charreton@proxmox.com \
--cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
--cc=t.lamprecht@proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.